What is the cut-off frequency of opening apertures with finite depth into a plenum?
Best insight from top research papers
The cutoff frequency of opening apertures with finite depth into a plenum can be predicted using the modal and sound transmission coefficient superposition (MSTCS) method . This method is applicable for apertures of arbitrary cross-section and can be used both below and above the cutoff frequency. The MSTCS method has been compared to other methods such as the transfer matrix method, acoustic FEM, and experimental data, and has shown good agreement .
Answers from top 4 papers
More filters
Papers (4) | Insight |
---|---|
Open access 01 Jan 2014 | The provided paper does not mention the cut-off frequency of opening apertures with finite depth into a plenum. |
72 Citations | The provided paper does not mention the cut-off frequency of opening apertures with finite depth into a plenum. |
The provided paper does not mention the cut-off frequency of opening apertures with finite depth into a plenum. | |
5 Citations | The provided paper does not mention the cut-off frequency of opening apertures with finite depth into a plenum. |
Related Questions
What is the highest resolution and penetration depth for tissue clearing?5 answersThe highest resolution and penetration depth for tissue clearing are crucial for advanced imaging techniques. Various methods have been developed to address this challenge. STED microscopy, utilizing embedding medium CFM3, achieves a resolution allowing proper visualization of dendritic spines at around 40 μm depth. Optical clearing techniques like CUBIC, CLARITY, 3DISCO, and SeeDB enable imaging of whole tissues with depths defined by microscope optics rather than tissue limitations. Multiphoton microscopy (MPM) with optical clearing can penetrate over 2 mm into tissues, producing large 3-D datasets of organs like the brain, intestine, kidney, lung, and testicle. Additionally, optical-resolution photoacoustic microscopy (OR-PAM) benefits from glycerol as a clearing agent, significantly enhancing imaging performance both in vitro and in vivo.
How is a cut-off value determined on frequency tables?5 answersA cut-off value on frequency tables can be determined using various methods discussed in the provided contexts. These methods include the Mean±2SD method, Logistic Regression Analysis, Receivers Operating Characteristics (ROC) curve analysis, Discriminant Analysis (DA). Additionally, a cutoff frequency determination method involves quantizing the distribution of signals before and after filtering, then determining the cutoff frequency based on the Shannon entropy trajectory. Cut-off sampling methods are also utilized, such as the LH algorithm and a new cost function minimization approach, to optimize cut-off points in business surveys. Furthermore, the determination of epidemiological cut-off values (ECOFFs) for antimicrobial susceptibility testing requires a systematic approach based on quality-controlled minimum inhibitory concentration series. These methods collectively contribute to accurately determining cut-off values on frequency tables for various analytical purposes.
What are the dimensions of the pyriform aperture?5 answersThe dimensions of the pyriform aperture vary based on sex and individual characteristics. In males, the height of the pyriform aperture is generally higher (31.4 mm) compared to females (29.4 mm). However, the width of the pyriform aperture is similar for both sexes, with mean values of 25.7 mm. In cases of congenital nasal pyriform aperture stenosis (CNPAS), a smaller pyriform aperture size of less than 6 mm is associated with the need for surgical intervention. The width of the pyriform aperture can be increased through surgical dilation, resulting in improved nasal airflow. The pyriform aperture is the most anterior and narrowest part of the airway, and even small changes in its diameter can significantly impact airway flow resistance. Surgical repair methods for CNPAS include nasal dilation and bone resection via a sublabial approach.
What is the best cut off score for the test?3 answersThe best cut-off score for the test varies depending on the specific study and its objectives. In the first study, the cut-off scores calculated using different methods ranged from 62% to 68%. In the second and third studies, a cut-off score of eight was recommended as a reasonable approximation for predicting alcohol-related harm. The fourth study focused on a different test and found that a cut-off score of 60 repetitions in 2 minutes was indicative of low cardiopulmonary endurance in hypertensive elderly individuals. The fifth study did not provide specific information about the best cut-off score for the admissions test. Therefore, the best cut-off score for a test depends on the specific context and objectives of the study.
Does the objective aperture in a cryo-EM microscope influence on parallelism of the beam?5 answersThe objective aperture in a cryo-EM microscope does influence the parallelism of the beam. The cut-off effects of the objective aperture can cause a drop in transmitted beam intensities, leading to a decrease in parallelism of the beam. Additionally, the alignment of the objective aperture with the electron beam is crucial for maintaining parallelism. An automatically aligning objective aperture assembly can be used to ensure proper alignment. Furthermore, the use of slot shaped objective apertures can improve the visibility of details in specimens observed by transmission electron microscopy, while retaining high resolution in a chosen direction. Therefore, the objective aperture plays a significant role in maintaining the parallelism of the beam in a cryo-EM microscope.
How does a hole in an acoustic panel affect the sound waves that travel through it?3 answersA hole in an acoustic panel can affect the sound waves that travel through it by influencing the absorption coefficient and resonance frequency of the panel. The interaction between the micropores in the panel and the distance between the micropores can impact the sound absorption performance. Additionally, the length of the hole and the frequency of the sound can affect the acoustic velocity of the air in the hole. The vortex-sound interaction within a short hole can also strongly affect the acoustic response at low frequencies. The expansion ratios on either side of the hole can further influence the acoustics of the hole. Overall, the presence of a hole in an acoustic panel can alter the sound waves by affecting absorption, resonance, and the interaction between the air and the hole.