scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

What is the most cost effective temperature for thermostat in summer? 

Answers from top 8 papers

More filters
Papers (8)Insight
The same analysis implies that it is rational to keep th e thermostat setting constant throughout the heating season rather th an changing it with changes in external temperature.
This thermostat is effective, inexpensive, and easy to adjust.
They may also provide a good estimate of energy savings obtained if we decide to increase thermostat set point temperature.
Open accessBook ChapterDOI
Enda Barrett, S.P. Linder 
07 Sep 2015
77 Citations
Our results show that the learning thermostat can achieve cost savings of 10% over a programmable thermostat, whilst maintaining high occupant comfort standards.
A case study is done and the OC shows significant potential in both energy and cost saving in comparison to the digital thermostat controller used in most of the HPWHs on the market.
The C(1,2) thermostat is found to be more robust than the BT thermostat without increasing computational costs.
The social benefits of the optimizing thermostat may provide incentives for utilities and regulators to encourage its adoption.
We expect this thermostat to be useful in other non-equilibrium scenarios as well.

See what other people are reading

What are the current advancements in omni directional robotic arms as per recent research papers?
5 answers
What are the main theses of Paco Calvo?
4 answers
How to lower the thermal conductivity of asphalt during microwave?
5 answers
What are the design considerations for a Kaplan turbine shaft?
5 answers
What is the definition of autocontrole through experimental analysis of behavior?
5 answers
What is a control system?
5 answers
What measures can be taken to improve safety when using doorknobs in rest rooms or comfort rooms?
5 answers
What measures can be taken to improve safety when using doorknobs in rest rooms or comfort rooms?
5 answers
Number of iot connected device?
5 answers
The number of Internet of Things (IoT) connected devices is rapidly increasing. Currently, there are nearly 30 billion IoT devices connected worldwide, with a projection to double in the next four years, reaching over 41 billion by 2027. By 2023, machine-to-machine devices are expected to represent nearly 50% of all connected devices, making them ideal candidates for wireless power due to their small size and increasing mobility demands. The surge in IoT devices, ranging from smart thermostats to industrial applications, highlights the pervasive nature of these connected devices in various sectors. This exponential growth in IoT devices underscores the significant impact and integration of IoT technology in our daily lives and industries.
What are the negative impact of 3D Printing in terms of Quality Control for Military and defense sector?
5 answers
The negative impacts of 3D printing on quality control in the military and defense sector stem from potential issues such as poor printing effects, wire drawing, nozzle blockage, and the risk of circumventing export controls. In the context of additive manufacturing, specifically fused deposition modeling (FDM), challenges include deformed geometry, clogged nozzles, and dimensional inaccuracies, often due to imprudent trial-and-error processes and troubleshooting quality control. Research emphasizes the importance of understanding printing conditions, such as print deposition angle, shell walls, and retraction speed, to enhance the quality of 3D printed parts, with factors like retraction speed and deposition angle significantly impacting final quality. These issues highlight the critical need for stringent quality control measures to prevent defects and ensure the reliability of 3D printed components in military and defense applications.
What are the negative impact of 3D Printing in terms of Quality Control for Manufacturers?
5 answers
3D printing, while offering benefits like complex structures and mass customization, poses challenges in quality control for manufacturers. Issues such as poor printing effects, wire drawing, and nozzle blockages are often linked to control system deficiencies. Base vibrations during printing can significantly degrade part quality, with base vibration impacting part roughness 600 times more than machine operation. Failures in FDM processes, such as deformed geometry and clogged nozzles, are preventable but often occur due to imprudent print processes and troubleshooting quality control. Understanding printing conditions like deposition angle and retraction speed is crucial for enhancing final part quality, with factors like humidity affecting filament bonding strength. Detecting and adjusting printing settings based on filament defects can help reduce unusable parts and improve manufacturing outcomes.