Search or ask a question

What other research did an initial exploration about learning with only 20 participants?

Stochastic game

Normal-form game

Behavioral game theory

Best insight from top research papers

An initial exploration about learning with only 20 participants was conducted in the study by Kuznetsov, Huber, and Sternad. They examined how participants explored task solutions in a virtual throwing task, where one group had an easy target location and the other a difficult one. The study hypothesized that participants would initially explore the task result space and then fine-tune their solutions over practice. Results showed that both groups found an initial task solution region, but only the easy target group increased variability to continue exploring the result space. This research highlighted the role of movement variability in skill acquisition and the importance of exploring different solutions as participants become more skilled.

Answers from top 5 papers

PDF

Open Access

More filters

Papers (5)	Insight
Open access An Experimental Examination of Group Size Effects: Implications for Experiential Learning J. Duane Hoover, Carlton J. Whitehead - Show less +1 more 13 Mar 1976	Not addressed in the paper.
Open access•Journal Article•DOI An Experimental Study of Learning in an Online Citizen Science Project: Insights into Study Design and Waitlist Controls Janis L. Dickinson, Rhiannon Crain - Show less +1 more 24 Oct 2019 4 Citations	Not addressed in the paper.
Proceedings Article•DOI Exploratory aspects of variability in learning a novel skill Nikita A. Kuznetsov, Meghan E. Huber, Dagmar Sternad - Show less +2 more 25 Apr 2014	Not addressed in the paper.
Journal Article•DOI Learning About Speech by Experiment: Issues in the Investigation of Spontaneous Talk within the Experimental Research Paradigm Rebecca Hughes, Beatrice Szczepek Reed - Show less +1 more 01 May 2011-Applied Linguistics 5 Citations	Not addressed in the paper.
Open access•Proceedings Article•DOI Experimental Research about Learning in Inductive Game Theory Yu Wang, Ming-Sheng Chen, Xiao Han, Fei-Na Yu - Show less +3 more 14 Aug 2015 1 Citations	Not addressed in the paper.

My columns

Related Questions

What type of research has no participants?4 answersResearch that involves non-participation typically refers to studies where individuals decline to participate or do not actively engage in the research process. Various studies have highlighted the impact of non-participation on research outcomes. For instance, studies have shown that non-participants in clinical trials may exhibit less favorable outcomes compared to participants, affecting the overall sample representation. In other cases, non-participation bias can lead to skewed results, especially in studies involving subjects with severe mental illnesses who are more likely to be non-participants, causing selection bias. Additionally, non-participation in telehealth trials can stem from barriers such as technological challenges and limited disease understanding, influencing the success of telehealth initiatives.

Why is 30 participants the minimum for a study?5 answersThe minimum number of 30 participants for a study is crucial due to various factors affecting research outcomes. Studies have shown that the sample size significantly impacts research results, with reductions leading to decreased correlations, increased errors, and variability. Proper sample size calculation is essential for the internal validity of a study, considering factors like significance level, study power, effect size, and precision. In behavioral neuroscience, reducing sample size affects research outcomes, emphasizing the importance of adequate participant numbers for reliable results. Additionally, in experiments involving map users, the number of participants is determined based on the test's purpose, highlighting the variability in required sample sizes depending on the study's characteristics. Therefore, a minimum of 30 participants ensures statistical power, reliability, and validity in research across various fields.

Why choose 30 participants for a study?5 answersChoosing 30 participants for a study can be influenced by various factors. For instance, in the 30/30 Program study, the program involved 30 at-risk students who were mentored for 30 months to improve academic outcomes. Similarly, the U.S. POINTER study recruited over 30% of its participants from underrepresented communities to ensure diversity and inclusivity in the research. The SoliMix study aimed to explore the impact of baseline participant characteristics on study outcomes, which could require a specific number of participants for meaningful analysis. Therefore, selecting 30 participants may be strategic based on the study's objectives, resources, and the need for statistically significant results within the given context.

Is 20 participants in learning web development sufficient?5 answersBased on the research findings, the adequacy of 20 participants in learning web development can vary depending on the specific usability evaluation method employed. While there is no fixed number of participants to identify all usability issues, the rule of 16 users is considered valid in user testing. In contrast, three evaluators are adequate to uncover 91% of usability problems in the Domain Specific-to-context Inspection (DSI) method. Additionally, a study introducing a system that learns participants of given scripts outperformed baselines, showcasing the significance of participant selection in web experiments. Therefore, when considering the effectiveness of participant numbers in web development learning, it is essential to account for the specific evaluation method and the nature of the study to ensure comprehensive insights and reliable outcomes.

Can a neuromarketing study be conducted on 20 participants?5 answersA neuromarketing study can be conducted on 20 participants. The presented research on consumer willingness to undergo Neuro-Biofeedback had a sample size of 222 respondents aged from 20 to 52 years, indicating that a study can be conducted with a smaller number of participants. Additionally, a review of previous research on neuromarketing using neuroimaging techniques, specifically electroencephalogram (EEG), was conducted, suggesting that studies can be conducted with a smaller number of participants as well. Therefore, based on these findings, it is feasible to conduct a neuromarketing study with 20 participants.

Is a sample size of 20 participants in a healthcare study sufficient?5 answersA sample size of 20 participants may not be sufficient for a healthcare study. Sample size calculations are important for ensuring statistical support, limiting risks to participants, and optimizing economic and time costs. Inadequate sample sizes can lead to larger trials than necessary, wasting research dollars and exposing participants to unnecessary risks. Good sample selection and appropriate sample size are crucial for strengthening a study and obtaining valid and clinically relevant findings. The specific requirements for sample size calculation include well-elaborated objectives and hypotheses, defined outcome variables, and appropriate identification of type I and type II errors. It is recommended to collaborate with relevant healthcare professional disciplines early in the research planning stages to enhance recruitment and participation. Therefore, it is important to carefully consider the specific research question and consult with experts to determine an appropriate sample size for a healthcare study.

See what other people are reading

What is self-interaction in sociology?

Self-interaction in sociology refers to the concept of individuals engaging with themselves within social contexts. This interaction with oneself can manifest in various forms, such as self-reflection, self-regulation, and self-optimization. Sociological perspectives highlight the importance of understanding the wider social, cultural, and political dimensions of self-tracking practices, emphasizing the social nature of self-tracking cultures. Additionally, self-interaction plays a role in promoting cooperation within social dilemmas, where individuals may gain additional rewards by interacting with themselves, influencing their cooperative behavior. Theoretical frameworks integrating self-relations into the analysis of social interactions provide insights into how individuals relate to themselves and others, contributing to the understanding of forms of association among self-relating individuals.What is self-interaction?

Self-interaction refers to a fundamental concept where a system interacts with itself, leading to various consequences in different fields of study. In particle physics, the Principle of Self-interaction suggests that only a primordial field exists, necessitating any changes to be based on self-interaction due to the absence of external factors. In the realm of game theory, self-interaction mechanisms, such as voluntary participation and additional rewards for cooperative behavior, significantly impact the evolution of cooperation in games like the prisoner's dilemma, either facilitating cooperative clusters or leading to dominance cycles of strategies. Moreover, in classical gauge theories and general relativity, self-interaction manifests as topological phases and rearrangements of degrees of freedom, influencing the behavior of systems like electromagnetic fields and black holes.What is free play，including fine motor play?

Free play, particularly fine motor play, is a crucial aspect of child development. Free play is defined as unstructured, child-directed play that allows children to explore, create, and learn without adult intervention. Fine motor play involves activities that challenge and develop the small muscles in the hands and fingers, essential for tasks like writing and buttoning clothes. Research indicates that children in Head Start programs often do not engage in challenging fine motor play during free play sessions. The decline in free play opportunities for children is concerning, as it is linked to reduced mental health and developmental issues. Strategies to promote free play, such as creating safe "home roads" for community play, can help enhance children's freedom to engage in beneficial play activities.What is free play，including fine motor play，such as?

Free play refers to unstructured, child-directed play that is essential for healthy development. It allows children to explore, create, and make decisions without external constraints, promoting their well-being and adaptive functioning. Free play is closely linked to children's freedom and creativity, providing a sense of freedom and safety for them to practice and master new skills. Fine motor play, a component of free play, involves activities that enhance hand-eye coordination and dexterity, such as drawing, building with blocks, or threading beads. Teachers play a crucial role in facilitating free play by respecting children's autonomy while offering support when needed. Overall, free play is a vital aspect of childhood that fosters social, cognitive, and emotional development.Are public good games and prisoner's dillema the same?

Public good games and prisoner's dilemma are related but not the same. Public good games model cooperative behavior in groups with incentives to free ride, while prisoner's dilemma focuses on individual decision-making in a competitive setting. In public good games, individuals contribute to a common pool, with some potentially free riding. On the other hand, prisoner's dilemma involves two players choosing to cooperate or defect, highlighting the tension between individual and group interests. Both games explore social dilemmas and the balance between self-interest and collective welfare, but they differ in their focus and setup. Public good games often involve multiple players and contributions to a shared resource, while prisoner's dilemma typically involves two players making simultaneous decisions with conflicting payoffs.Why are sustainable supply chains important?

Sustainable supply chains are crucial for several interconnected reasons that span environmental, social, and economic dimensions. Firstly, they address the immediate effects of climate change by promoting practices that aim to reduce carbon emissions and ecological degradation, thereby contributing to global efforts like the Paris Agreement and mitigating the adverse impacts on ecosystems. Sustainable supply chains also support the circular economy paradigm, which emphasizes resource efficiency and the reduction of negative production impacts, aligning economic growth with environmental and social benefits. From an economic perspective, integrating sustainability into supply chains can enhance business performance by fostering supply chain cooperation, operation integration, and enterprise commitment, which in turn positively affects sustainability outcomes and competitive advantage, especially in small- and medium-sized enterprises. This is further supported by the role of sustainable logistics and third-party logistics companies in achieving more profitable, yet environmentally and socially responsible, supply chain operations. Technological adoption within sustainable supply chains, such as big data analytics, plays a pivotal role in enhancing transparency, sustainability culture, and risk management, thereby improving the overall sustainability of manufacturing supply chains. Moreover, sustainable supply chain management (SSCM) is essential for addressing suppliers' sustainability conflicts in multinational supply chains, particularly in developing nations, by fostering sustainable transformation through innovation diffusion and cooperation. In the agri-food sector, sustainable supply chains ensure the well-being of people and profitability, highlighting the importance of maintaining food supply systems that are both value-driven and sustainable. Additionally, in the construction industry, sustainable supply chain management addresses social, environmental, and economic concerns by employing life cycle assessment and triple bottom line sustainability dimensions, thus providing a framework for improving sustainability integration. Overall, sustainable supply chains are vital for achieving a balance between economic growth and the preservation of environmental and social well-being, making them indispensable in the pursuit of a sustainable future.What is gamification theory?

Gamification theory is a concept that involves applying game design elements and mechanics to non-game contexts to enhance engagement and motivation. It is a strategy that utilizes learning theories such as behavioral, cognitive, and constructivist theories to create more effective educational experiences. Game theory, on the other hand, focuses on interactions where decision-making information influences outcomes, with applications in various fields like medicine, engineering, and business. Game theory provides a framework for analyzing cooperation and competition in diverse scenarios, from economic situations to social dilemmas like the tragedy of the commons or the prisoner's dilemma. Overall, gamification theory emphasizes the importance of creating a conducive and competitive learning environment through motivation, exploration, and implementation.How do different rating scales and methodologies for assessing attack feasibility impact the allocation of resources for cybersecurity?

Different rating scales and methodologies for assessing attack feasibility play a crucial role in optimizing the allocation of cybersecurity resources. The use of attack-defense trees and game theory aids in analyzing cyber-attack paths and defense strategies within systems like the Smart Grid, enabling the optimal allocation of resources for cybersecurity infrastructure. Additionally, the implementation of quantitative simulation models, such as the AnyLogic model, enhances the accuracy of measuring the probability of success of threat actors, guiding decision-makers on resource allocation for cybersecurity controls. Moreover, the Markov Decision Process framework offers an approach for allocating limited cybersecurity resources between different layers of defense, such as agility and recovery, ensuring a comprehensive defense-in-depth strategy.How does resource-based theory inform educational resource allocation decision-making processes?

Resource-based theory plays a crucial role in informing educational resource allocation decision-making processes. This theory emphasizes the significance of valuable, rare, inimitable, and non-substitutable resources in gaining a competitive advantage. In the context of higher education, the allocation of resources is essential for developing capabilities that set educational organizations apart. By focusing on human capital and the development of valuable employees, institutions can enhance their competitive edge and better satisfy the needs of students and stakeholders. Additionally, the adoption of comprehensive and longer-range approaches to academic planning can further improve resource allocation procedures in educational settings, aligning with the principles of resource-based theory.What is the correlation between mobile game playing and strategic thinking skills in individuals?

Research on strategic behavior in games suggests that individuals' ability to process information, particularly short-term memory capacity, correlates with their strategic thinking skills. Studies have shown that differences in short-term memory capacity impact problem-solving and reasoning tasks, influencing individuals' adherence to game-theoretic strategies. Additionally, the application of gamified environments has been found to enhance learning, engagement, and the development of individual competences, which are crucial for organizational success. Furthermore, a study on university students revealed a significant relationship between thinking skills and strategic learning, indicating a strong correlation between the two aspects. Therefore, engaging in mobile game playing, especially those involving strategic thinking elements, may potentially contribute to the development and enhancement of individuals' strategic thinking skills.What strategies have been developed for calculating indeterminacies?

Various strategies have been developed for calculating indeterminacies in different contexts. One approach involves developing algorithms that compute accurate solutions for dynamic stochastic general equilibrium models subject to indeterminacy of rational expectations. In the realm of decision-making, an algorithm based on indeterminacy resolving functions of intuitionistic fuzzy numbers has been proposed to solve multi-criteria matrix games with I-fuzzy goals, demonstrating effectiveness through numerical simulations. Additionally, a novel computational algorithm has been utilized to approximate the entire set of competitive equilibria in stochastic overlapping generations models, highlighting the significant impact of indeterminacy on long-run consumption and asset price volatility. Furthermore, a model has been introduced to reduce the indeterminacy index of inconsistent interval multiplicative pairwise comparison matrices, ensuring improved quality and consistency in decision-making processes.