scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

What primer pairs are used for ngs of plant endophytes? 


Best insight from top research papers

The primer pairs used for next-generation sequencing (NGS) of plant endophytes include 799F/1107R, 322F/796R, and 322F-Dr/796Rs, designed to specifically amplify bacterial 16S from plant total DNAs . Additionally, primer pair 322F-1 and 796R, along with DNA polymerase lacking 3' to 5' exonuclease proofreading activity, are utilized to avoid contamination from host plant chloroplast 16S rDNA and mitochondria 18S rDNA, resulting in a pure bacteria colony 16S amplicon library . Furthermore, novel primers fM1 and rC5, along with 515f-GC/rC5, are employed for nested PCR denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (PCR-DGGE) to analyze the diversity of endophytic bacteria in Dendrobium officinale, revealing Proteobacteria as the dominant group, particularly Burkholderia, which may play essential roles in the plant .

Answers from top 5 papers

More filters
Papers (5)Insight
The PCR assay in the study used specific primers flanking a microsatellite-containing locus (MS primers) for detection and quantification of Epichloe endophytes in grass tissue.
Novel 16S rDNA-targeted primers fM1 and rC5, along with 515f-GC/rC5, are used for nested PCR-DGGE to analyze endophytic diversity in Dendrobium officinale.
The primer pairs used for NGS of plant endophytes are 799F/1107R, 322F/796R, and 322F-Dr/796Rs, designed to specifically amplify bacterial 16S from plant total DNAs, enabling accurate sequencing.
The primer pairs used for amplification of endophytic fungi ITS gene in plant tissue are NSA3 and NLC2 for the first round, followed by a nested PCR second round amplification primer pair.
The primer pair 322F-1 and 796R is used for NGS of plant endophytes, targeting the V3 to V4 region of bacteria 16SrDNA to avoid contamination from plant mitochondria and chloroplast DNA.

Related Questions

Isolation of endophytes from maize5 answersEndophytes have been successfully isolated from maize plants in various studies. These endophytes play crucial roles in plant protection, growth promotion, and biocontrol activities against toxigenic fungi. Studies have identified a diverse range of endophytic fungi and bacteria from maize roots, with genera like Trichoderma, Bacillus, and Fusarium being prevalent. These endophytes have shown biocontrol potential against harmful fungi like Aspergillus and Fusarium, which produce mycotoxins affecting maize quality. Additionally, certain endophytic fungi, such as Chaetomium spp., have demonstrated the ability to control soil-borne diseases like late wilt caused by Cephalosporium maydis, further highlighting the importance of endophytes in maize health and productivity. Overall, these findings emphasize the significance of isolating and studying endophytes from maize for agricultural applications.
Isolation of endophytes from maize root, stem and seed4 answersEndophytes have been successfully isolated from maize roots, stems, and seeds in various studies. These endophytes play crucial roles in plant protection, growth promotion, and biocontrol activities. The isolated endophytes belong to diverse genera such as Bacillus, Streptomyces, Paenibacillus, and Pseudomonas, showcasing a wide range of functions like nitrogen fixation, phosphate solubilization, and antagonistic effects against fungal pathogens. Additionally, endophytic bacteria have been found to produce various beneficial compounds like indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), nitrogen-fixing enzymes, lytic enzymes, and antibiotics, contributing to plant growth and disease suppression. These findings highlight the importance of studying endophytes from different parts of maize plants to harness their potential for enhancing crop productivity and health.
Isolation of endophytic bacteria5 answersEndophytic bacteria have been isolated from various sources including bryophytes in Mount Abu, Rajasthan, root nodules of legume plants in Duhok province, Taxus plants in West Sumatra, and rice plants in Inceptisol. The isolation methods involved inoculating plant tissues onto specific media and identifying the bacteria based on phenotypic characteristics and 16S rDNA sequencing. The isolated endophytic bacteria belonged to different phyla and genera, such as Firmicutes and γ-proteobacteria, Pantoea sp., Enterobacter sp., Clostridium sp., Kosakonia sp., Pseudomonas sp., Curtobacterium sp., Erwinia sp., Salmonella sp., and Rahnella sp., and gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. Some of the isolated endophytic bacteria exhibited antimicrobial activity. The diversity and population density of endophytic bacteria varied depending on the plant tissue and geographical location.
How to extract dna seed endophytes?5 answersTo extract DNA from seed endophytes, there are several methods outlined in the provided abstracts. One method involves collecting plant materials, washing them with sterile water, and disinfecting the surface before performing endophyte leaching. Another method involves isolating DNA from endosperm tissue using optimal procedures for modern rice grains and aged rice remains. Additionally, there are protocols for isolating genomic DNA from fungal endophytes, which can be used for barcoding purposes. Bacterial endophytes can also be extracted using cultivation-dependent and -independent approaches, as demonstrated in a study on surface-sterilized rice seeds. These methods provide valuable insights into the composition and functions of endophytic microorganisms, and can be used to study their interactions with plants and their potential applications in agriculture, industry, and medicine.
What are the most effective methods for testing endophyte levels in tall fescue?5 answersThe most effective methods for testing endophyte levels in tall fescue include analyzing gene expression through microarray experiments, measuring metabolite levels in shoot and root tissues, and evaluating the presence or absence of endophyte infection in plants. These methods provide insights into the impact of endophytes on plant growth, reproduction, and response to environmental conditions. In particular, metabolite profiling can reveal the accumulation of compatible solutes in response to water deficit stress, indicating the role of endophytes in enhancing drought tolerance. Additionally, gene expression analysis can identify differentially expressed genes between endophyte-infected and endophyte-free plants, shedding light on the molecular mechanisms underlying the symbiotic interaction. Overall, a combination of these methods can provide a comprehensive understanding of endophyte levels and their effects on tall fescue.
How to apply endophytes to plants?5 answersEndophytes can be applied to plants by establishing a successful host-endophyte relationship, where the host plants provide nutrients and water as biostimulants to trigger signals for a successful endophytic relationship. Plant endophytes promote plant growth, enhance plants' resistance to diseases, pests, and environmental stresses, and improve the synthesis of important secondary metabolites in plants. Bacterial endophytes, mainly present in the plant's root systems, improve plant health and can be used as bio-fertilizers. Symbiotic fungal root endophytes, such as Serendipita spp., have beneficial effects on plants, including induction of resistance to pathogens and overall growth promotion. Fungal endophytes also offer benefits to host plants, including enhanced resistance to insect pests and improved tolerance to abiotic stresses. To apply endophytes, it is important to understand their functional significance and overall role in improving host fitness in natural environments.

See what other people are reading

What is multiplex pcr?
5 answers
Multiplex PCR is a technique that allows the simultaneous amplification of multiple target DNA sequences in a single reaction. This method is highly versatile and can be applied to various DNA templates, including human DNA, plant DNA, clinical samples, and DNA for methylation analysis. It involves the use of multiple primer pairs in the same reaction mixture to detect different targets, such as human genetic markers and nuclear chromosomal genes of non-human species. Multiplex PCR can be optimized for specific applications, like the rapid detection of bacterial pathogens causing pneumonia, with the potential for expansion to analyze viral and fungal pathogens as well. Proper primer design, precise calibration of reaction conditions, and a robust detection system are crucial factors that influence the success and quality of multiplex PCR assays.
What is dna extraction?
5 answers
DNA extraction is a fundamental process in molecular analysis, crucial for various downstream applications like PCR, DNA sequencing, and forensic investigations. Different methods, from manual to automated, have been developed to isolate DNA from samples like blood, saliva, sweat, tears, and mucus. These methods aim to obtain high-quality DNA by removing contaminants like polysaccharides, proteins, and secondary metabolites that can hinder enzymatic activities like DNA polymerase and restriction enzymes. The extracted DNA can be quantified and analyzed for its quality, making it suitable for forensic purposes. Rapid DNA extraction methods have also been introduced to save time, reduce costs, and minimize the use of hazardous chemicals, benefiting both efficiency and safety in DNA extraction processes.
Why i only see endoparasite in auxis rochei and theres no ectoparasites found?
5 answers
The absence of ectoparasites and presence of endoparasites in Auxis rochei could be attributed to the specific interactions between the fish and its parasites. Studies have shown that endoparasites in fish tend to associate with a higher number of host species, leading to higher connectance and nestedness in their subnetworks compared to ectoparasites. Additionally, the parasite fauna of A. rochei from different regions displayed variations, with higher mean abundances of certain parasites in fish from specific locations. Genetic analyses revealed significant genetic differences between populations of A. rochei, indicating distinct stocks possibly influenced by factors like reproductive strategies and natal homing behavior. Furthermore, phylogenetic studies suggest that A. rochei represents an ancestral species, which may have implications on its parasite interactions.
How to conduct mixed biological replicates in plant biology for qPCR?
5 answers
To conduct mixed biological replicates in plant biology for qPCR, it is crucial to optimize the workflow to minimize technical variability and ensure reliable results. One approach is to increase the number of replicates based on the tissue type used. For instance, more RT replicates are recommended for leaf tissue, while more sampling replicates are advised for stems or fruits to enhance result accuracy. Additionally, employing a sensitive and high-throughput qPCR-based method can accurately detect gene-edited mutants in various plant species, allowing for the simultaneous analysis of multiple samples without post-PCR handling. Ensuring RNA quality, integrity, and compliance with MIQE guidelines are essential steps in optimizing the protocol for gene expression analysis in plant tissues, which has been successfully applied across different plant species.
What factors influence the choice of the lowest similarity percentage threshold in OTUs analysis?
5 answers
The choice of the lowest similarity percentage threshold in OTUs analysis is influenced by various factors. Factors include the need to limit MOTU over-merging or over-splitting, the trade-off between these risks, the marker specificity, and the research objectives. Additionally, the robustness of microbial community structures to different clustering thresholds, the ecological structuring gradients, and the stability of abundant OTUs across thresholds play a role in determining the threshold choice. Studies have shown that for certain markers like the 16S rRNA gene, optimal identity thresholds approximating species are around 99% for full-length sequences and 100% for specific hypervariable regions. Furthermore, the choice of similarity threshold impacts the resulting ecological quality index, with different thresholds affecting the discrimination between sampling sites and index stability.
Why is FST better than RST?
5 answers
FST (Fast Static Symbol Table) is superior to RST (Regular Static Symbol Table) due to its lightweight compression scheme for strings, offering faster decompression and compression speeds with significantly better compression factors on text data. Additionally, FST allows random access to individual compressed strings, enabling lazy decompression and query processing on compressed data, making it a valuable tool in the compression toolbox. On the other hand, RST does not provide the same level of efficiency and flexibility in handling compressed strings as FST does. Therefore, FST's ability to combine speed, compression efficiency, and random access makes it a preferred choice over RST for various applications involving string compression and processing.
How to automate specificity list for PCR prime?
5 answers
To automate the specificity list for PCR primers, various methods have been developed. One approach involves utilizing a program that automates the design of specific and reliable primers for multiplex PCR by acquiring data on selected genes and processing it to group candidate primers effectively. Another method includes a webserver that automatically designs tiled primer pairs for genomic loci, splitting DNA sequences into smaller regions and identifying candidate primers using Primer3 followed by cross-hybridization checks via BLAST. Additionally, an automatic primer design method for AS-PCR has been proposed, where inner primers are designed based on SNP loci sequences for efficient fluorescent AS-PCR, ensuring high specificity in gene typing analysis. Lastly, a study presents a completely automated pipeline using deep learning and evolutionary algorithms to design specific primer sets for different SARS-CoV-2 variants, demonstrating the rapid development of molecular tests for unique variant identification.
How does E.coli bacteria contribute to urinary tract infections in children?
5 answers
E. coli bacteria play a significant role in urinary tract infections (UTIs) in children by being the most common pathogen associated with these infections. They exhibit high levels of antibiotic resistance and possess virulence factors that aid in adhesion and invasion, contributing to the severity of UTIs. Studies have shown that E. coli isolates from pediatric UTIs display resistance to multiple antibiotics, with varying levels of resistance to different drugs. Additionally, these bacteria harbor virulence genes such as fimH, papGII, and chuA, which enhance their pathogenicity. The presence of ESBLs and other resistance genes like bla-CTX-M further complicates treatment strategies, emphasizing the need for continuous monitoring and development of novel antimicrobials to combat pediatric UTIs caused by E. coli.
What are the most common PCR-based techniques used for adulteration detection in food products?
5 answers
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with species-specific primers is a widely used technique for detecting food adulteration. Multiplex PCR methods have been developed to detect adulteration in mackerel-based products with pleco and chicken. Additionally, a triplex PCR method has been utilized to determine the species composition of dairy products, focusing on beef, sheep, and goat. Real-time PCR and droplet digital PCR have been established for detecting cereal species like bread wheat, durum wheat, rye, and barley, with specific primer-probe systems optimized for each species. PCR-based techniques offer high sensitivity and specificity, making them suitable for detecting trace amounts of adulterants in processed food products.
Laboratory methods for macrophomina phaseolina increase?
8 answers
The increase in laboratory methods for detecting and managing Macrophomina phaseolina, a widespread soil-borne pathogen, reflects the agricultural community's urgent need to address the diseases it causes across various crops. Traditional detection methods have been largely replaced by molecular technologies due to their higher sensitivity, speed, and precision. These include PCR-based techniques, fluorescence in situ hybridization, whole genome sequencing, and genetic diversity analysis, which can identify multiple isolates in a single attempt and are crucial for implementing effective disease management strategies. Recent advancements have also explored the use of nanoparticles as antifungal agents against M. phaseolina, demonstrating their effectiveness under lab and greenhouse conditions. Metallic nanoparticles like Ag, Cu, Zn, and others have shown potential in controlling the pathogen, offering an eco-friendly alternative to traditional fungicides. Laboratory and greenhouse assays have been established to evaluate the pathogenicity of M. phaseolina, using microsclerotia and hyphae as inoculum, which further underscores the importance of accurate pathogen detection and characterization. Moreover, the development of a specific method and kit for determining the presence of M. phaseolina in biological samples represents a significant step forward in diagnostic capabilities. The impact of climate change on the spread of M. phaseolina has also been highlighted, with studies confirming the pathogen's pathogenicity and polyphagous nature through morphological and molecular characterization. Research in Hungary has tested the efficacy of different fungicides against M. phaseolina, identifying some as more effective than others, which is crucial for developing resistant crop varieties. The use of biochar from sewage sludge and Trichoderma harzianum has shown promise in controlling M. phaseolina in bean crops, indicating the potential of biological control methods. Essential oils have been evaluated for their antifungal effects against M. phaseolina, with some demonstrating significant inhibitory activity, suggesting their use as biofungicides. Next-generation sequencing and comparative genomics have been employed to develop diagnostic tools with high specificity for M. phaseolina, enabling rapid detection in soil and infected plants. Lastly, the efficiency of beneficial microorganisms in the biological control of M. phaseolina and promotion of sunflower growth has been tested, highlighting the potential of biocontrol agents in integrated disease management. These developments collectively represent a multifaceted approach to combating M. phaseolina, combining molecular diagnostics, chemical, and biological control strategies.
What is the difference between methylation sensitive high resolution melting technique and methylation sensitive melt curve analysis?
5 answers
Methylation-Sensitive High-Resolution Melting (MS-HRM) technique and Methylation-Sensitive Melt Curve Analysis are both methods used for measuring DNA methylation changes. MS-HRM, as described in, utilizes one set of primers to amplify both methylated and non-methylated templates, allowing for the quantification of methylation levels. On the other hand, Methylation-Sensitive Melt Curve Analysis, exemplified in, specifically focuses on analyzing methylation levels through high-resolution melting curves. While MS-HRM faces limitations in methylation level calculation due to PCR bias, Methylation-Sensitive Melt Curve Analysis overcomes this by establishing a standard curve for quantitative methylation analysis. Both techniques have shown promise in detecting methylation changes accurately, with MS-HRM being applied in cancer surveillance like inand Methylation-Sensitive Melt Curve Analysis being utilized for detecting MSH2 methylation in skin tumors.