Why is liquid level measurement necessary?
Best insight from top research papers
Liquid level measurement is necessary for various reasons. It plays an important role in industry and daily life, such as in oil tanks, gasoline stations, and public water supplies . Traditional electronic sensors may not be suitable for harsh environments, which is why optical sensors have become attractive for liquid level sensing . Additionally, a liquid tank level measurement system using accelerometers attached to the tank wall can provide vibration measurements that indicate the liquid level condition . Furthermore, a liquid-level oil contamination measurement system using laser beams and spectrograph analysis can accurately measure the thickness and type of oil contamination on liquid levels . Lastly, a liquid level measuring system with pressure sensors can detect abnormalities and determine the normality of the sensors for early detection of issues in drainage pipelines .
Answers from top 5 papers
More filters
| Papers (5) | Insight |
|---|---|
Patent 01 Nov 2018 1 Citations | The provided paper does not explicitly mention why liquid level measurement is necessary. |
| The provided paper does not explicitly mention why liquid level measurement is necessary. | |
| The provided paper does not explicitly mention why liquid level measurement is necessary. The paper focuses on describing a liquid tank level measurement system using an accelerometer. | |
| Liquid level measurement is necessary in the scrubber to ensure proper water supply for wetting the cleaning roller shaft and to monitor the level of cleaned sewage or stolen goods in the second water tank. | |
09 Jan 2015 2 Citations | Liquid level measurement is necessary for various applications in industry and daily life, such as oil tanks, gasoline stations, and public water supplies. (Answer is in the paper) |
Related Questions
What the moisture analysis for liquid?4 answersMoisture analysis for liquid involves various methods to determine the moisture content accurately. Techniques include using resonators to measure volume concentration of precipitated moisture, employing continuous flow analyzers with carrier gas to detect moisture content, introducing concepts like entransy and transfer resistance to analyze irreversibility and moisture transfer in liquid desiccant dehumidification, utilizing analyzers to measure water content by allowing water molecules to escape into a carrier gas for detection, and applying liquid membranes in soil for moisture conservation and evaporation suppression, with structural analysis revealing enhanced soil-membrane interactions for improved moisture retention. These diverse approaches offer insights into moisture analysis in liquids, catering to different applications and analytical requirements.
How are liquid assets measured?5 answersLiquid assets are measured using various proxies and dimensions. One approach is to measure liquidity based on transaction cost, volume, price impact, and multidimension-based measures. Another method is to use daily data to identify high-quality proxies for liquidity, allowing for the study of liquidity over long timeframes and across different countries. Liquidity can also be defined by the bid-ask spread and its components, which can be estimated using intra-daily measures. The measurement of liquidity requires considering three dimensions: time, volume, and price. These dimensions capture the tightness indicated by the bid-ask spread, the depth of the market, and the resiliency of the market. Intra-daily measures of liquidity are relevant for capturing the core features of a market and accounting for the arrival of new information.
What are the limitation of acoustic level determination of liquid level_?3 answersThe limitations of acoustic level determination of liquid level include the complexity of the reflected acoustic signal due to the influence of noises in the annulus between tubing and casing, making it difficult to identify the real liquid level. Additionally, the measurement range is limited when air is a gas medium, with the upper limit typically reaching only about 8.28 m. Another limitation is the presence of background noises that can affect the accuracy of liquid level detection. Furthermore, in low-liquid level regions, accurately measuring the liquid level can be challenging. These limitations can lead to errors in the measurement process and reduce the overall precision of liquid level determination.
What are the limitations of PRESSURE SURVEY SHOWING LIQUID LEVEL in predicting liquid loading?3 answersPressure surveys showing liquid level have limitations in predicting liquid loading. The fabrication and material compatibility properties of level sensors restrict their dynamic range and accuracy. Additionally, the current models for predicting liquid loading onset in gas wells have their own limiting assumptions and may not accurately capture the complex interactions between the reservoir and wellbore. These models are often based on theories such as droplet reversal and film reversal, but the liquid loading mechanism is still not fully understood. Furthermore, some of the existing models have complicated calculations and conservative results. The accuracy of the predictions can vary depending on factors such as inclination angle and flow regime transitions. Therefore, while pressure surveys showing liquid level can provide some indication of liquid loading, they may not be able to accurately predict its onset due to these limitations.
What are the level of measurement?3 answersThe levels of measurement are nominal, ordinal, interval, and ratio. Nominal data represent names or labels of categories, while ordinal data can be ranked but the distance between values is not consistent. Interval data communicate both order and quantity, with equal intervals between data points, and ratio-level data have a true absolute zero. These levels of measurement are important for quantifying phenomena and conducting statistical analyses.
How to measure liquidity risk?2 answersMeasuring liquidity risk involves incorporating the risk of securities being difficult to buy or sell without causing significant price changes. Various approaches have been proposed in the literature. Allaj et al. present a general framework for measuring liquidity risk, defining risk measures that are increasing monotonic and convex cash sub-additive on long positions. Golan proposes a model that uses Artificial Neural Networks and Bayesian Networks to measure liquidity risk, demonstrating the applicability and efficiency of data mining methods. Weber et al. construct a new liquidity-adjusted risk measure that can be interpreted as a capital requirement, considering price impact and limited access to financing. Sun introduces liquidity risk measures that account for liquidity effects and establishes the relationship between these measures and acceptance sets. Stange and Kaserer integrate liquidity risk measured by the weighted spread into a Value-at-Risk framework, showing that liquidity risk increases price risk and should not be simply added to it.