scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers on "Biomarker (medicine) published in 1992"


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Biomarkers can provide not only evidence of exposure to a broad spectrum of anthropogenic chemicals, but also a temporally integrated measure of bioavailable contaminant levels.
Abstract: An approach, using biomarkers (biological responses) for assessing the biological and ecological significance of contaminants present in the environment is described. Living organisms integrate exposure to contaminants in their environment and respond in some measurable and predictable way. Responses are observed at several levels of biological organization from the biomolecular level, where pollutants can cause damage to critical cellular macromolecules and elicit defensive strategies such as detoxication and repair mechanisms, to the organismal level, where severe disturbances are manifested as impairment in growth, reproduction, developmental abnormalities, or decreased survival. Biomarkers can provide not only evidence of exposure to a broad spectrum of anthropogenic chemicals, but also a temporally integrated measure of bioavailable contaminant levels. A suite of biomarkers are evaluated over time to determine the magnitude of the problem and possible consequences. Relationships between biomarker response and adverse ecological effects are determined from estimates of animal health and population structure.

124 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
01 Sep 1992-Cancer
TL;DR: Current research supports a concept of a field defect of the colorectal mucosa at risk for neoplasia, which may be identified by phenotypic abnormalities of the normal mucosa and the development of small adenomas.
Abstract: The term biologic marker (biomarker) of colorectal cancer refers in this article to an early preclinical phenotypic characteristic that relates to the risk for developing this cancer. Putative biologic markers in the normal colorectal mucosa of patients at risk include abnormal cell proliferation as determined by kinetic studies, ornithine decarboxylase activity, and polyamine synthesis. Alterations of mucin synthesis have been studied using both histochemical stains and lectin-binding techniques. Blood group and related carbohydrate antigens also have been evaluated as potential biomarkers in the normal mucosa

44 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The results suggest that nuclear size and ploidy may function as intermediate endpoint biomarkers of effect for oncogenesis and that epigenetic as well as genetic mechanisms may be primary in the oncogenic proces.
Abstract: The understanding of intermediate endpoint biomarker expression in relation to the sequential events in bladder tumorigenesis establishes a useful approach for evaluating chemopreventive agents Biomarkers may be genotypic or phenotypic and function as biomarkers of susceptibility, exposure, effect, or disease This paper reviews several years of research on biomarkers and their use in monitoring chemoprevention therapy In initial animal experiments, mice were dosed with N-butyl-N-(4-hydroxybutyl)nitrosamine (OH-BBN) while co-administering N-(4-hydroxyphenyl)retinamide (4-HPR) 4-HPR did not statistically reduce tumor incidence, but did affect tumor differentiation and, consequently, nuclear size and DNA ploidy These results suggest that nuclear size and ploidy may function as intermediate endpoint biomarkers of effect for oncogenesis and that epigenetic as well as genetic mechanisms may be primary in the oncogenic process Early biomarkers of effect which occur prior to genetic effects or chromosome aberration may portend a higher probability of being modulated by differentiating agents such as retinoids In vitro studies demonstrated that RPMI-7666 cells cultured with a phorbol ester tumor promoter (12-O-tetradecanoyl-phorbol-13-acetate) could be redifferentiated with 13-cis-retinoic acid and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) F-actin, a cytoskeletal biomarker with a presumed function in the epigenetic mechanisms of carcinogenesis, could also be normalized in HL-60 cells treated with 4-HPR or DMSO A clinical evaluation of F-actin in patients with varying degrees of risk confirmed the value of F-actin as a differentiating biomarker useful for bladder cancer risk assessment The clarification of when the phenotypic changes of F-actin occur in the oncogenic process was achieved when a variety of biochemical changes were mapped in the patients with bladder cancer These studies confirmed that G-actin, a reciprocal form of F-actin, is increased relatively early in bladder cancer oncogenesis when multiple biomarkers are quantitated in the field, adjacent area, and the tumor Comparison of each individual biomarker's expression from field, adjacent to tumor, and tumor, and subsequent cluster analysis of these biomarkers, indicated that the possible sequence of phenotypic expression of biomarkers in bladder cancer oncogenesis is from G-actin, to p300 antigen, to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), to p185 (neu oncogene product), to DNA aneuploidy and, finally, to visual morphology(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

22 citations


Journal Article
TL;DR: Advances in understanding the genetic basis for cancer will lead to the development of probes that will help assess risk for many cancers, and relevant biomarker intermediate endpoints will need to be identified, studied, and verified in human models.
Abstract: Detection of cancer is the definitive endpoint in the conduct of chemoprevention trials. There are, however, several reasons why cancer as the endpoint may not be feasible or ethical: 1) the usage of patients with easily followable preneoplasias may preclude the development of cancer, and 2) the time to a cancer event may be long or the incidence uncommon, even in individuals at high risk. Two major types of biomarker intermediate endpoints should be considered: 1) those that identify individuals at high risk and 2) those that serve as a surrogate for cancer. Various epidemiologic features, including family history, have been used to estimate relative risk. This approach, however, only slightly decreases the size of populations needed for chemoprevention trials and only little addresses the question of individual risk. Advances in understanding the genetic basis for cancer will lead to the development of probes that will help assess risk for many cancers. Innumerable biomarker intermediate endpoints can be identified as associated with cancer formation, including genetic, epigenetic, and histologic features. The challenge is not in identifying potential biomarker intermediate endpoints but in showing that they are relevant. Carcinogenesis has been shown to be carcinogen, inhibitor, dose, tissue, and species specific; it is likely that relevant biomarker intermediate endpoints will need to be identified, studied, and verified in human models. The upper aerodigestive system should be a rich source for biomarker intermediate endpoint studies, as tissue is readily available, the carcinogenic process can be monitored, and there are currently available reasonable compounds to use in biomarker intermediate endpoint modulation and chemoprevention trials.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

17 citations