scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers on "Brand awareness published in 1976"


Book ChapterDOI
01 Jan 1976
TL;DR: In this paper, a two-dimensional brand loyalty concept compared to a purely behavioral definition is proposed, which is based on the concept of brand loyalty, and a two dimensional brand loyalty model is developed.
Abstract: Development of a two-dimensional brand loyalty concept compared to a purely behavioral definition.

1,271 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors conceptualized perceived risk in terms of expected negative utility associated with automobile brand preferences, and empirical evidence supports the notion that importance of loss is more useful as...
Abstract: Perceived risk is conceptualized in terms of expected negative utility associated with automobile brand preferences. Empirical evidence supports the notion that importance of loss is more useful as...

659 citations


Book ChapterDOI
01 Jan 1976
TL;DR: In this article, a stochastic learning model was used to predict consumer brand shares from the sequence, rhythm, and frequency of consumers' past purchases of frozen orange juice concentrates.
Abstract: A stochastic learning model describes consumer brand shifting. Brand shares are predicted from the sequence, rhythm, and frequency of consumers’ past purchases. Data on frozen orange juice concentrates is used as empirical work.

132 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors employed a 2X2X3 factorial design with nationality, brand, and price as main effects to evaluate the quality of a soft drink concentrate.
Abstract: Price and brand image as determinants of product quality evaluations were investigated in a study that employed a 2X2X3 factorial design with nationality, brand, and price as main effects. The product was a previously unknown soft drink concentrate. Subjects were 181 American and 164 French undergraduate students. Subject and brand main effects, and two of the interaction effects (Subject X Brand and Subject X Brand X Price) were statistically significant. French subjects evaluated both brands as being of higher quality than did American subjects, and the French brand was evaluated higher than the American brand. In addition, the nature of the price-product quality evaluation relationship differed between nationalities and between brands.

58 citations