scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers on "Consensus reality published in 1989"


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, a model of how people negotiate with reality so as to maintain their personal theories of being good and in-control people is described, and excuse-making and hoping are discussed as examples of such reality negotiation processes.
Abstract: Following a brief review of the traditional viewpoint regarding the adaptiveness of accurately perceiving reality, the emerging perspective on the usefulness of illusions about the self is presented. In this latter vein, a model of how people negotiate with “reality” so as to maintain their personal theories of being “good and in-control” people is described, and excuse-making and hoping are discussed as examples of such reality negotiation processes. The implications of the reality negotiation processes for society in general and individuals in particular are also explored. Last, theoretical speculations are made in regard to the conditions in which the illusion-based reality negotiation processes change from being adaptive to maladaptive.

295 citations


Book
01 Jan 1989

77 citations


Journal Article

27 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Why don’t the authors' learning programs just keep on going and become generally intelligent?
Abstract: Why don’t our learning programs just keep on going and become generally intelligent? The source of the problem is that most of our learning occurs at the fringe of what we already know. The more you know, the more (and faster) you can learn.

12 citations


Book ChapterDOI
01 Jan 1989
TL;DR: In this article, the disparity and incompatibility of firmly held ideas about the nature of consciousness and the manner in which it is to be studied is discussed, and an empirical study examining the relationship between notions of consciousness with beliefs about reality is described.
Abstract: The researcher approaching the study of the nature of consciousness for the first time is often bewildered by the plethora of viewpoints and lack of consensus in this area of study. Why does this situation exist? The problem appears to lie in the disparity and incompatibility of firmly held ideas about the nature of consciousness and the manner in which it is to be studied. Many of these ideas are defended by their proponents, not only as the only legitimate ideas about consciousness, but as the only existent ones. What apears to be accepted in theory, but fails to be appreciated in practice, is the recognition that these various versions of consciousness are correlated with a given person’s purported experience and their personal beliefs about the nature of reality. After briefly demonstrating the disparity of views concerning consciousness, an empirical study examining the nature of the relationship between notions of consciousness and beliefs about reality is described.

7 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the problem of a feminist historical and social reconstruction based on texts is addressed in the context of the Nordic Journal of Theology, Vol. 43, No. 1, pp. 19-34.
Abstract: (1989). Text and reality ‐ reality as text: The problem of a feminist historical and social reconstruction based on texts. Studia Theologica - Nordic Journal of Theology: Vol. 43, No. 1, pp. 19-34.

5 citations


Journal ArticleDOI

4 citations