scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers on "Latency (engineering) published in 1970"


Journal ArticleDOI
03 Apr 1970-Science
TL;DR: A difference between cat and pigeon with respect to connections between labyrinth and vestibular nuclei is demonstrated with electrical stimulation of the pigeon labyrinth.
Abstract: Electrical stimulation of the pigeon labyrinth evokes responses in many second-order vestibular neurons with a latency shorter than the monosynaptic delay These early responses are probably due to electrically mediated synaptic transmission, or perhaps to antidromic invasion of cells supplying efferent fibers to the labyrinth In either case the results demonstrate a difference between cat and pigeon with respect to connections between labyrinth and vestibular nuclei

39 citations









Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Changes in response latency were examined under conditions where task difficulty was varied by manipulating length of retention interval and formal similarity of test alternatives and indicated that correct recognition decreased and latencies of correct recognitions increased with increasing length of reception interval and degrees of similarity.

3 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors recorded response latencies from observers given the task of detecting sinusoidal signals presented in a white noise background, where the probability that a signal would be presented was 0.5.
Abstract: Response latencies were recorded from observers given the task of detecting sinusoidal signals presented in a white noise background. On each trial, the probability that a signal would be presented was 0.5. The observers indicated their decisions as to whether or not a signal had been presented by pressing buttons. They were instructed to adopt different decision criteria (strict, medium, or lax) for making a YES response during different sessions of the experiment. For most criteria adopted, the mean latency of YES responses was less than the mean latency of NO responses. In addition, the mean latency of YES responses made after a signal had been presented was less than the mean latency of YES responses made after noise alone had been presented. Similarly, the mean latency of NO responses to noise alone was less than the mean latency of NO responses to signals. Latencies varied widely as a function of the criterion adopted. Receiver operating characteristics were constructed from the latency distributions, as well as from the YES and NO responses ignoring latency.

2 citations