Alex Dubgaard

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors used the economic valuation method Choice Experiments to assess the willingness to pay for reducing the visual disamenities from future offshore wind farms using a fixed effect logit model and found that the average willingness of consumers to pay amounts were 46, 96 and 122 Euros/household/year for having the wind farms located at 12, 18 and 50 km from the coast as opposed to 8 km.

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors implement a controlled, multi-site experiment to develop and test guidance principles for benefits transfers, and provide guidance on the appropriate specification of transferable value functions arguing that these should be developed from theoretical rather than ad hoc statistical approaches.

TL;DR: In this article, the authors investigated the visual disamenities of offshore wind farms in the coastal zone and found that people who can see wind farms from their residence, anglers and recreational boaters, significantly perceive the visual impacts to be more negative compared to people who do not use the coastal area for those specific purposes.

TL;DR: It is found that average welfare measures differ considerably according to whether respondents who disagree with the status quo levels and find proposed scenarios unlikely are included or not.

TL;DR: In this article, the authors propose to use a screening procedure based on a relatively conservative cost-benefit analysis (CBA) as a first step towards identifying areas where costs could be disproportionate.