scispace - formally typeset
A

Alex Gillespie

Researcher at London School of Economics and Political Science

Publications -  161
Citations -  5464

Alex Gillespie is an academic researcher from London School of Economics and Political Science. The author has contributed to research in topics: Health care & Dialogical self. The author has an hindex of 39, co-authored 151 publications receiving 4618 citations. Previous affiliations of Alex Gillespie include University of Cambridge & University of Stirling.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Intersubjectivity: Towards a Dialogical Analysis

TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a dialogical approach to study intersubjectivity at different levels, as both implicit and explicit, and both within and between individuals and groups, and make use of self-report, observing behaviour, analysing talk and ethnographic engagement.
Journal ArticleDOI

Cognitive Function and Assistive Technology for Cognition: A Systematic Review

TL;DR: Results show that ATC have been used to effectively support cognitive functions relating to attention, calculation, emotion, experience of self, higher level cognitive functions (planning and time management) and memory.
Journal ArticleDOI

Patient complaints in healthcare systems: a systematic review and coding taxonomy

TL;DR: Through synthesising data from 59 patient complaint studies, a coding taxonomy is proposed for supporting future research and practice in the analysis of patient complaint data.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Use of Symbolic Resources in Developmental Transitions

TL;DR: In this paper, symbolic resources are used to mediate the representational work occasioned by ruptures or discontinuities in the smooth experience of ordinary life, moments when the 'taken-for-granted' meanings cease to be taken for granted.
Journal ArticleDOI

A pragmatist approach to the problem of knowledge in health psychology.

TL;DR: A pragmatist approach to the multiplicity of forms of health-related knowledge, including biomedical knowledge, lay knowledge and critical constructionist knowledge, is proposed and implications for research methodology and the choice of research goals are identified.