scispace - formally typeset
A

Alexander E. Lobkovsky

Researcher at Northeastern University

Publications -  8
Citations -  930

Alexander E. Lobkovsky is an academic researcher from Northeastern University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Grain boundary & Phase (matter). The author has an hindex of 6, co-authored 8 publications receiving 894 citations.

Papers
More filters

Tip splitting instability in a phase field model of mode III dynamic fracture

TL;DR: In this paper, a phenomenological continuum model for the mode III dynamic fracture is introduced based on the phase-field methodology used extensively to model interfacial pattern formation, which consistently includes both macroscopic elasticity and a simple rotationally invariant short-scale description of breaking.
Journal ArticleDOI

Extending Phase Field Models of Solidification to Polycrystalline Materials

TL;DR: In this paper, a two-dimensional phase field model of grain boundary statics and dynamics is presented, where the grain boundary energy as a function of misorientation, the liquid-grain-grain triple junction behavior, the wetting condition for a grain boundary and stabilized widths of intercalating phases at these boundaries, and evolution of a polycrystalline microstructure by solidification and impingement.
Journal ArticleDOI

Unsteady crack motion and branching in a phase-field model of brittle fracture.

TL;DR: Light is shed on the physics that controls the speed of accelerating cracks and the characteristic branching instability at a fraction of the wave speed in mode III brittle fracture.
Journal ArticleDOI

Phase field model of premelting of grain boundaries

TL;DR: In this paper, a phase field model of solidification is presented, which includes the effects of the crystalline orientation in the solid phase, and the model describes grain boundaries as well as solid liquid boundaries within a unified framework.
Journal ArticleDOI

Grain shape, grain boundary mobility and the Herring relation

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examined the question: does interface mobility depend on the nature of the driving force, and concluded that the answer is "no." This conclusion highlights the importance of including the second derivative of the interface energy with respect to inclination γ ′′ in the Herring relation in order to correctly describe the motion of grain boundaries driven by capillarity.