scispace - formally typeset
A

Alexander Tropsha

Researcher at University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Publications -  306
Citations -  26956

Alexander Tropsha is an academic researcher from University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. The author has contributed to research in topics: Quantitative structure–activity relationship & Virtual screening. The author has an hindex of 71, co-authored 288 publications receiving 22898 citations. Previous affiliations of Alexander Tropsha include Kazan Federal University.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Rational principles of compound selection for combinatorial library design.

TL;DR: Rational approaches to selecting representative subsets of virtual libraries that help direct experimental synthetic efforts for both targeted and diverse library design are discussed.
Journal ArticleDOI

Combined Application of Cheminformatics- and Physical Force Field-Based Scoring Functions Improves Binding Affinity Prediction for CSAR Data Sets

TL;DR: It is found that the combination of QSBAR models and MedusaScore into consensus scoring function affords higher prediction accuracy than any of the contributing methods achieving R(2) values of 0.45/0.58 (Set1/Set2).
Journal ArticleDOI

Learning from history: do not flatten the curve of antiviral research!

TL;DR: It is argued that, to develop effective treatments for COVID-19 and be prepared for future epidemics, long-term, consistent investment in antiviral research is needed.
Journal ArticleDOI

Recent progress on cheminformatics approaches to epigenetic drug discovery.

TL;DR: The advances in computational approaches to drug discovery of small molecules with epigenetic modulation profiles are reviewed, the current chemogenomics data available for epigenetics targets are summarized, and a perspective on the greater utility of biomedical knowledge mining as a means to advance the epigenetic drug discovery is provided.
Journal ArticleDOI

Predicting binding affinity of CSAR ligands using both structure-based and ligand-based approaches.

TL;DR: This study shows that externally validated 2D QSAR models were capable of ranking CSAR ligands at least as accurately as more computationally intensive structure-based approaches used both by us and by other groups and ligand-based QSar models can complement structure- based approaches by boosting the prediction performances when used in consensus.