scispace - formally typeset
A

Alexander Tropsha

Researcher at University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Publications -  306
Citations -  26956

Alexander Tropsha is an academic researcher from University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. The author has contributed to research in topics: Quantitative structure–activity relationship & Virtual screening. The author has an hindex of 71, co-authored 288 publications receiving 22898 citations. Previous affiliations of Alexander Tropsha include Kazan Federal University.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Rational Combinatorial Library Design. 2. Rational Design of Targeted Combinatorial Peptide Libraries Using Chemical Similarity Probe and the Inverse QSAR Approaches

TL;DR: A novel strategy for rational design of targeted peptide libraries to select a subset of natural amino acids that are most likely to be present in active peptides for the synthesis of library is developed.
Journal ArticleDOI

Development of quantitative structure-binding affinity relationship models based on novel geometrical chemical descriptors of the protein-ligand interfaces

TL;DR: It is concluded that QSBR models built with the ENTess descriptors can be instrumental for predicting the binding affinity of receptor-ligand complexes.
Journal ArticleDOI

Quantitative Structure−Activity Relationship Modeling of Dopamine D1 Antagonists Using Comparative Molecular Field Analysis, Genetic Algorithms−Partial Least-Squares, and K Nearest Neighbor Methods

TL;DR: The success of all of the QSAR methods indicates the presence of an intrinsic structure-activity relationship in this group of compounds and affords more robust design and prediction of biological activities of novel D(1) ligands.
Journal ArticleDOI

Use of Cell Viability Assay Data Improves the Prediction Accuracy of Conventional Quantitative Structure–Activity Relationship Models of Animal Carcinogenicity

TL;DR: It is suggested that combining NTP-HTS profiles with conventional chemical descriptors could considerably improve the predictive power of computational approaches in toxicology.