scispace - formally typeset
A

Andrew N. Meltzoff

Researcher at University of Washington

Publications -  326
Citations -  44488

Andrew N. Meltzoff is an academic researcher from University of Washington. The author has contributed to research in topics: Imitation & Cognition. The author has an hindex of 101, co-authored 318 publications receiving 41549 citations. Previous affiliations of Andrew N. Meltzoff include University of Oxford & Chiba University.

Papers
More filters
Patent

Method and system for developing and administering subject-appropriate implicit tests of association

TL;DR: In this article, the authors evaluate many aspects of ITA content, content presentation, and administration with regard to particular categories of test subjects in order to develop subject-appropriate ITAs (SAITAs) and to administer SAITAs appropriately to the categories for which the tests are developed.
Patent

Self-concept implicit association test

TL;DR: In this article, the authors describe methods and systems that enable the administration of implicit association tests without the use of self-concept or self-report, and present an example method that involves a computing system providing a visual indication of categories including (i) a user-associated-objects category (ii) user-unassociated objects category, (iii) a positive value-object category, and (iv) a negative valence-object classifier.
Journal ArticleDOI

Body representations as indexed by oscillatory EEG activities in the context of tactile novelty processing.

TL;DR: Investigating neural oscillations involved in tactile novelty processing, in particular how physically different digits of the hand may be categorized as being more or less similar to one another finds that deviant tactile stimuli evoked significantly greater theta event-related synchronization and greater phase-locking values compared to the corresponding control stimuli.
Journal ArticleDOI

Infants' recognition of cross-modal correspondences for speech: Is it based on physics or phonetics

TL;DR: For instance, Kuhl and Meltzoff as mentioned in this paper found that infants look longer at the face that matched the sound being presented, while infants who heard /a/ looked longer at /i/ face.