A
Andrew N. Meltzoff
Researcher at University of Washington
Publications - 326
Citations - 44488
Andrew N. Meltzoff is an academic researcher from University of Washington. The author has contributed to research in topics: Imitation & Cognition. The author has an hindex of 101, co-authored 318 publications receiving 41549 citations. Previous affiliations of Andrew N. Meltzoff include University of Oxford & Chiba University.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Learning to make things happen: Infants' observational learning of social and physical causal events.
TL;DR: Findings about infant observational causal learning have implications for children's rapid nonverbal learning about people, things, and their causal relations.
Journal Article
Exploring the Infant Social Brain: What's Going on in There?
TL;DR: In this article, the authors explore learning opportunities that occur during everyday interchanges between adults and infants and how these influence the brain and examine longitudinal data to understand how children's earliest social interactions set the stage for school readiness and lifelong learning.
Book ChapterDOI
Why Faces are Special to Infants — on Connecting the Attraction of Faces and Infants’ Ability for Imitation and Cross-Modal Processing
TL;DR: In this paper, a cross-modal hypothesis about why faces are attractive and meaningful to infants is proposed, and the results show that there is no disappearance or drop out of imitation in early infancy; however, infants develop social expectations about face-to-face interaction that sometimes supersede imitation.
Journal ArticleDOI
Neural measures of anticipatory bodily attention in children: Relations with executive function
TL;DR: It is suggested that anticipatory mu desynchronization has utility as a specific neural marker of attention focusing in young children, which in turn may be implicated in the development of executive function.
Journal ArticleDOI
Meta-Analytic Use of Balanced Identity Theory to Validate the Implicit Association Test.
Dario Cvencek,Andrew N. Meltzoff,Craig D. Maddox,Brian A. Nosek,Laurie A. Rudman,Thierry Devos,Yarrow Dunham,Andrew Scott Baron,Melanie C. Steffens,Kristin A. Lane,Javier Horcajo,Leslie Ashburn-Nardo,Amanda Quinby,Sameer B. Srivastava,Kathleen Schmidt,Eugene Aidman,Emilie Tang,Shelly Farnham,Deborah S. Mellott,Mahzarin R. Banaji,Anthony G. Greenwald +20 more
TL;DR: A within-study statistical test of the balance–congruity principle, finding that it had greater efficiency than the previous best method, and simultaneously validated interpretation of the IAT’s zero point as indicating absence of preference between two attitude objects.