A
Andrew N. Meltzoff
Researcher at University of Washington
Publications - 326
Citations - 44488
Andrew N. Meltzoff is an academic researcher from University of Washington. The author has contributed to research in topics: Imitation & Cognition. The author has an hindex of 101, co-authored 318 publications receiving 41549 citations. Previous affiliations of Andrew N. Meltzoff include University of Oxford & Chiba University.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Emotional Eavesdropping: Infants Selectively Respond to Indirect Emotional Signals
TL;DR: Two experiments examined whether 18-month-olds learn from emotions directed to a third party, and whether infants learn from emotional eavesdropping, and their subsequent behavior depends on the Emoter's orientation toward them.
Journal ArticleDOI
Event-related potential (ERP) indices of infants' recognition of familiar and unfamiliar objects in two and three dimensions.
TL;DR: This is the first study using 3-D objects in conjunction with ERPs in infants, and it introduces an interesting new methodology for assessing infants' electrophysiological responses to real objects.
Journal ArticleDOI
Cognitive consistency and math-gender stereotypes in Singaporean children.
TL;DR: It is discovered that Singaporean children's math-gender stereotypes increased as a function of age and that boys identified with math more strongly than did girls despite Singaporean girls' excelling in math.
Journal ArticleDOI
Socioeconomic disparities in academic achievement: A multi-modal investigation of neural mechanisms in children and adolescents.
TL;DR: Ass associations of childhood SES and a potential mechanism—degree of cognitive stimulation in the home environment—with cortical structure, white matter microstructure, and neural function during a working memory (WM) task across development are investigated.
Journal ArticleDOI
Re-examination of Oostenbroek et al. (2016): evidence for neonatal imitation of tongue protrusion
Andrew N. Meltzoff,Lynne Murray,Elizabeth A. Simpson,Mikael Heimann,Emese Nagy,Jacqueline Nadel,Eric J. Pedersen,Rechele Brooks,Daniel S. Messinger,Leonardo De Pascalis,Francys Subiaul,Annika Paukner,Pier Francesco Ferrari +12 more
TL;DR: 11 flaws are identified in Oostenbroek et al.'s experimental design that biased the results toward null effects that raise fundamental issues about action representation, social learning, and brain-behavior relations.