scispace - formally typeset
A

Anisa Visram

Researcher at University of Manchester

Publications -  14
Citations -  195

Anisa Visram is an academic researcher from University of Manchester. The author has contributed to research in topics: Hearing aid & Medicine. The author has an hindex of 4, co-authored 9 publications receiving 85 citations. Previous affiliations of Anisa Visram include Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board & RMIT University.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Impacts of face coverings on communication: an indirect impact of COVID-19.

TL;DR: Findings illustrate the need for communication-friendly face-coverings, and emphasise the need to be communication-aware when wearing a face covering, to understand the impact of face coverings on hearing and communication.
Journal ArticleDOI

Cortical auditory evoked potentials as an objective measure of behavioral thresholds in cochlear implant users.

TL;DR: A strong correlation was found between CAEP and behavioral thresholds, implying that the cortical response may be more useful as an objective programming tool for cochlear implants than the auditory nerve response.
Journal ArticleDOI

Beneficial acoustic speech cues for cochlear implant users with residual acoustic hearing

TL;DR: For the group as a whole, only the unprocessed speech condition provided significant benefit over implant-alone scores, in both near-quiet and noise, which suggests that, on average, F0 or spectral cues in isolation provided limited benefit for these subjects in the tested listening conditions.
Journal ArticleDOI

Voice gender differences and separation of simultaneous talkers in cochlear implant users with residual hearing

TL;DR: There was an overall bimodal benefit, which was independent of target/masker gender difference, and in both listening conditions participants showed benefit of targets and masks, in both implant-alone and bIModal conditions.
Journal ArticleDOI

Recording Obligatory Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials in Infants: Quantitative Information on Feasibility and Parent Acceptability.

TL;DR: Analysis of interviews indicated that parents found CAEP testing to be a positive experience and recognized the benefit of having an assessment procedure that uses conversational level speech stimuli, and CAEPs have the potential to supplement existing practice in 3- to 9-month olds.