scispace - formally typeset
A

Anson Seers

Researcher at University of Alabama

Publications -  9
Citations -  782

Anson Seers is an academic researcher from University of Alabama. The author has contributed to research in topics: Job satisfaction & Industrial and organizational psychology. The author has an hindex of 7, co-authored 9 publications receiving 744 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Team-Member Exchange Under Team and Traditional Management: A Naturally Occurring Quasi-Experiment

TL;DR: The quality of exchange relationships between work teams and their members was assessed for 103 manufacturing workers as discussed by the authors, and higher levels of team-member exchange quality, as well as of cohesiveness, sat...
Journal ArticleDOI

The Interaction of Job Stress and Social Support: A Strong Inference Investigation

TL;DR: This article made a comparative examination of three alternative hypotheses (buffer, coping, no interaction) predicting job outcomes by job stress and social support, finding little evidence of role ambiguity for role ambiguity.
Journal ArticleDOI

The dual attachment concept: A longitudinal investigation of the combination of task characteristics and leader—member exchange☆

TL;DR: In this article, the dual attachment model is proposed for the integration of the job characteristic model and the leader-member exchange model, based upon the framework of organizational role theory, for the prediction of job attitudes and performance.
Journal ArticleDOI

Role conflict and role ambiguity: Do the scales measure these two constructs?

TL;DR: In this article, an analysis factorielle confirmatoire is presented on the echelles de conflit and d'ambiguite developpees par RIZZO, HOUSE et LIRTZMAN (1970) to verify a l'aide of trois modeles factoriels differents.
Journal ArticleDOI

Predictors of organizational commitment: Variations across career stages☆

TL;DR: In this paper, the matching of five predictors of organizational commitment to five career stages was investigated within a sample of 1536 employees within and between-stage analysis showed that, relative to other stages, the effect of team cohesion was stronger during the second stage.