scispace - formally typeset
A

Anthony Lasenby

Researcher at University of Cambridge

Publications -  155
Citations -  12811

Anthony Lasenby is an academic researcher from University of Cambridge. The author has contributed to research in topics: Cosmic microwave background & Galaxy cluster. The author has an hindex of 41, co-authored 155 publications receiving 11644 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Detection of cosmic microwave background structure in a second field with the Cosmic Anisotropy Telescope

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors describe observations at frequencies near 15 GHz of the second 2×2-deg2 field imaged with the Cambridge Cosmic Anisotropy Telescope (CAT), and show that the signal arises predominantly from the cosmic microwave background (CMB) radiation for multipoles in the lower half of this range.
Journal ArticleDOI

Maximum-entropy image reconstruction using wavelets

TL;DR: In this article, the maximum entropy method (MEM) is used for enhancing astronomical images and, in particular, has been applied to cosmic microwave background (CMB) observations, and the authors give a systematic discussion of how to combine these two approaches by the use of the MEM in wavelet bases for denoising and deconvolution of general images.
Journal ArticleDOI

Probing dark energy with steerable wavelets through correlation of WMAP and NVSS local morphological measures

TL;DR: In this article, the authors examined the three-year WMAP and the NVSS data for correlation induced by the integrated Sachs-Wolfe (ISW) effect, and the most significant detection was obtained in the correlation of the signed intensity of local features at a significance of 99.9%.
Journal ArticleDOI

All-sky component separation in the presence of anisotropic noise and dust temperature variations

TL;DR: In this article, an extension of the harmonic space maximum-entropy component separation method (MEM) for multifrequency cosmic microwave background observations is presented, which allows one to perform the separation with more plausible assumptions about the receiver noise and foreground astrophysical components.