scispace - formally typeset
B

B. Seshadri

Researcher at Purdue University

Publications -  6
Citations -  72

B. Seshadri is an academic researcher from Purdue University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Fault (power engineering) & Fault coverage. The author has an hindex of 6, co-authored 6 publications receiving 69 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

On Detection of Resistive Bridging Defects by Low-Temperature and Low-Voltage Testing

TL;DR: A probabilistic model of two-line nonfeedback short defects is used to quantify the coverage impact of low-voltage and low-temperature testing for different voltages and temperatures and suggests that test quality is improved even if no cost increase is allowed.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Dominance based analysis for large volume production fail diagnosis

TL;DR: Fault dominance is shown to be useful for reducing the fault simulation time during diagnosis when used together with the concept of pattern dependence and maximally dominating faults.

On Path Selection for Delay Fault Testing Considering Operating Conditions

TL;DR: The study provides a quantitative analysis of path criticality at different operating conditions and develops a path selection technique for path delay fault test generation that takes into account possible variations in operating conditions.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

On path selection for delay fault testing considering operating conditions [logic IC testing]

TL;DR: In this paper, a path selection technique for path delay fault test generation that takes into account possible variations in operating conditions is proposed, assuming that the operating conditions are uniform across multiple gates, however, they may assume one of a large range of values.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Accelerating diagnostic fault simulation using z-diagnosis and concurrent equivalence identification

TL;DR: Experimental results on ISCAS'89 benchmarks and industrial circuits indicate that diagnostic fault simulation is substantially faster by 20.6 to 46.9% when z-sets are used along with concurrent equivalent fault identification.