scispace - formally typeset
B

Ben Glocker

Researcher at Imperial College London

Publications -  363
Citations -  30047

Ben Glocker is an academic researcher from Imperial College London. The author has contributed to research in topics: Computer science & Segmentation. The author has an hindex of 60, co-authored 300 publications receiving 20402 citations. Previous affiliations of Ben Glocker include Analysis Group & Microsoft.

Papers
More filters
Book ChapterDOI

Automatic Localization of the Lumbar Vertebral Landmarks in CT Images with Context Features.

TL;DR: A method is presented for the addition of context features in a regression setting where the locations of many vertebral landmarks are regressed all at once and an automatic, endplate-based approach for the localization of the VB centers is presented.

Multi-Atlas Label Propagation with Atlas Encoding by Randomized Forests

TL;DR: The submitted approach follows the standard multi-atlas label propagation model, and each atlas is represented by a randomized classification forest, which is trained only on this atlas, which results in an efficient scheme which requires only a single registration to label a target.

NeuroNet: fast and robust reproduction of multiple brain Image segmentation pipelines

TL;DR: NeNet as discussed by the authors is a deep convolutional neural network mimicking multiple popular and state-of-the-art brain segmentation tools including FSL, SPM, and MALPEM.
Journal ArticleDOI

Deep Structural Causal Shape Models

TL;DR: Deep structural causal shape models (CSMs) are proposed, which utilise high-quality mesh generation techniques, from geometric deep learning, within the expressive framework of deep structural causal models, and enable subject-specific prognoses through counterfactual mesh generation.
Book ChapterDOI

Cranial Implant Design via Virtual Craniectomy with Shape Priors

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors propose and evaluate alternative automatic deep learning models for cranial implant reconstruction from CT images, which are trained and evaluated using the database released by the AutoImplant challenge, and compared to a baseline implemented by the organizers.