scispace - formally typeset
B

Ben Glocker

Researcher at Imperial College London

Publications -  363
Citations -  30047

Ben Glocker is an academic researcher from Imperial College London. The author has contributed to research in topics: Computer science & Segmentation. The author has an hindex of 60, co-authored 300 publications receiving 20402 citations. Previous affiliations of Ben Glocker include Analysis Group & Microsoft.

Papers
More filters
Posted Content

Morpho-MNIST: Quantitative Assessment and Diagnostics for Representation Learning

TL;DR: Morpho-MNIST is introduced, a framework that aims to answer: "to what extent has my model learned to represent specific factors of variation in the data" and a set of quantifiable perturbations to assess the performance of unsupervised and supervised methods on challenging tasks such as outlier detection and domain adaptation.
Book ChapterDOI

Confidence-Based Out-of-Distribution Detection: A Comparative Study and Analysis.

TL;DR: In this paper, the capability of various state-of-the-art approaches for confidence-based OOD detection through a comparative study and in-depth analysis was evaluated using chest X-rays.
Journal ArticleDOI

Effect of frailty on 6-month outcome after traumatic brain injury: a multicentre cohort study with external validation

Stefania Galimberti, +328 more
- 01 Feb 2022 - 
TL;DR: A frailty index specific to traumatic brain injury was developed and externally validated and could help to individualise rehabilitation approaches aimed at mitigating effects of frailty in patients withtraumatic brain injury.
Posted Content

Post-DAE: Anatomically Plausible Segmentation via Post-Processing with Denoising Autoencoders

TL;DR: It is shown how erroneous and noisy segmentation masks can be improved using Post-DAE, a post-processing method based on denoising autoencoders to improve the anatomical plausibility of arbitrary biomedical image segmentation algorithms.
Book ChapterDOI

Localisation of Vertebrae on DXA Images using Constrained Local Models with Random Forest Regression Voting

TL;DR: Random Forest Regression Voting Constrained Local Models (RFRV-CLMs) are evaluated for vertebral fracture assessment and show that, while they lead to slightly poorer median errors than AAMs, they are much more robust, reducing the proportion of fit failures by 68\%.