Chromosome congression during prometaphase culminates with the establishment of a metaphase plate, a hallmark of mitosis in metazoans. Classical views resulting from more than 100 years of research on this topic have attempted to explain chromosome congression based on the balance between opposing pulling and/or pushing forces that reach an equilibrium near the spindle equator. However, in mammalian cells, chromosome bi-orientation and force balance at kinetochores are not required for chromosome congression, whereas the mechanisms of chromosome congression are not necessarily involved in the maintenance of chromosome alignment after congression. Thus, chromosome congression and maintenance of alignment are determined by different principles. Moreover, it is now clear that not all chromosomes use the same mechanism for congressing to the spindle equator. Those chromosomes that are favorably positioned between both poles when the nuclear envelope breaks down use the so-called “direct congression” pathway in which chromosomes align after bi-orientation and the establishment of end-on kinetochore-microtubule attachments. This favors the balanced action of kinetochore pulling forces and polar ejection forces along chromosome arms that drive chromosome oscillatory movements during and after congression. The other pathway, which we call “peripheral congression”, is independent of end-on kinetochore microtubule-attachments and relies on the dominant and coordinated action of the kinetochore motors Dynein and Centromere Protein E (CENP-E) that mediate the lateral transport of peripheral chromosomes along microtubules, first towards the poles and subsequently towards the equator. How the opposite polarities of kinetochore motors are regulated in space and time to drive congression of peripheral chromosomes only now starts to be understood. This appears to be regulated by position-dependent phosphorylation of both Dynein and CENP-E and by spindle microtubule diversity by means of tubulin post-translational modifications. This so-called “tubulin code” might work as a navigation system that selectively guides kinetochore motors with opposite polarities along specific spindle microtubule populations, ultimately leading to the congression of peripheral chromosomes. We propose an integrated model of chromosome congression in mammalian cells that depends essentially on the following parameters: (1) chromosome position relative to the spindle poles after nuclear envelope breakdown; (2) establishment of stable end-on kinetochore-microtubule attachments and bi-orientation; (3) coordination between kinetochore- and arm-associated motors; and (4) spatial signatures associated with post-translational modifications of specific spindle microtubule populations. The physiological consequences of abnormal chromosome congression, as well as the therapeutic potential of inhibiting chromosome congression are also discussed.

https://www.mdpi.com/2079-7737/6/1/13/pdf

Mechanisms of Chromosome Congression during Mitosis

Mammalian oocytes segregate chromosomes with a microtubule spindle that lacks centrosomes, but the mechanisms by which acentrosomal spindles are organized and function are largely unclear. In this study, we identify a conserved subcellular structure in mammalian oocytes that forms by phase separation. This structure, which we term the liquid-like meiotic spindle domain (LISD), permeates the spindle poles and forms dynamic protrusions that extend well beyond the spindle. The LISD selectively concentrates multiple microtubule regulatory factors and allows them to diffuse rapidly within the spindle volume. Disruption of the LISD via different means disperses these factors and leads to severe spindle assembly defects. Our data suggest a model whereby the LISD promotes meiotic spindle assembly by serving as a reservoir that sequesters and mobilizes microtubule regulatory factors in proximity to spindle microtubules.

/pdf/a-liquid-like-spindle-domain-promotes-acentrosomal-spindle-2ec9cclog0.pdf

A liquid-like spindle domain promotes acentrosomal spindle assembly in mammalian oocytes

Microtubule Sliding within the Bridging Fiber Pushes Kinetochore Fibers Apart to Segregate Chromosomes.

Kinesin-5 Regulation and Function in Mitosis

In the mitotic spindle, kinetochore microtubules form k-fibers, whereas overlap or interpolar microtubules form antiparallel arrays containing the cross-linker protein regulator of cytokinesis 1 (PRC1). We have recently shown that an overlap bundle, termed bridging fiber, links outermost sister k-fibers. However, the relationship between overlap bundles and k-fibers throughout the spindle remained unknown. Here, we show that in a metaphase spindle more than 90% of overlap bundles act as a bridge between sister k-fibers. We found that the number of PRC1-GFP-labeled bundles per spindle is nearly the same as the number of kinetochore pairs. Live-cell imaging revealed that kinetochore movement in the equatorial plane of the spindle is highly correlated with the movement of the coupled PRC1-GFP-labeled fiber, whereas the correlation with other fibers decreases with increasing distance. Analysis of endogenous PRC1 localization confirmed the results obtained with PRC1-GFP PRC1 knockdown reduced the bridging fiber thickness and interkinetochore distance throughout the spindle, suggesting a function of PRC1 in bridging microtubule organization and force balance in the metaphase spindle.

PRC1‐labeled microtubule bundles and kinetochore pairs show one‐to‐one association in metaphase

During metaphase, forces on kinetochores are exerted by k-fibres, bundles of microtubules that end at the kinetochore. Interestingly, non-kinetochore microtubules have been observed between sister kinetochores, but their function is unknown. Here we show by laser-cutting of a k-fibre in HeLa and PtK1 cells that a bundle of non-kinetochore microtubules, which we term ‘bridging fibre’, bridges sister k-fibres and balances the interkinetochore tension. We found PRC1 and EB3 in the bridging fibre, suggesting that it consists of antiparallel dynamic microtubules. By using a theoretical model that includes a bridging fibre, we show that the forces at the pole and at the kinetochore depend on the bridging fibre thickness. Moreover, our theory and experiments show larger relaxation of the interkinetochore distance for cuts closer to kinetochores. We conclude that the bridging fibre, by linking sister k-fibres, withstands the tension between sister kinetochores and enables the spindle to obtain a curved shape.

/pdf/overlap-microtubules-link-sister-k-fibres-and-balance-the-1admaeoxwc.pdf

Overlap microtubules link sister k-fibres and balance the forces on bi-oriented kinetochores

Mitosis relies on forces generated in the spindle, a micro- machine composed of microtubules and associated proteins Forces are required for the congression of chromosomes to the metaphase plate and their separation in anaphase However, besides forces, torques may exist in the spindle, yet they have not been investigated Here we show that the spindle is chiral Chirality is evident from the finding that microtubule bundles in human spindles follow a left-handed helical path, which cannot be explained by forces but rather by torques Kinesin-5 (Kif11/Eg5) inactivation abolishes spindle chirality Our theoretical model predicts that bending and twisting moments may generate curved shapes of bundles We found that bundles turn by about −2 deg µm−1 around the spindle axis, which we explain by a twisting moment of roughly −10 pNµm We conclude that torques, in addition to forces, exist in the spindle and determine its chiral architecture

The mitotic spindle is chiral due to torques within microtubule bundles.

Mitosis relies on forces generated in the spindle, a micro-machine composed of microtubules and associated proteins. Forces are required for the congression of chromosomes to the metaphase plate and separation of chromatids in anaphase. However, torques may also exist in the spindle, yet they have not been investigated. Here we show that the spindle is chiral. Chirality is evident from the finding that microtubule bundles follow a left-handed helical path, which cannot be explained by forces but rather by torques acting in the bundles. STED super-resolution microscopy, as well as confocal microscopy, of human spindles shows that the bundles have complex curved shapes. The average helicity of the bundles with respect to the spindle axis is 1.2 degrees/micron. Inactivation of kinesin-5 (Eg5/Kif11) abolished the chirality of the spindle, suggesting that this motor generates the helical shape of microtubule bundles. To explain the observed shapes, we introduce a theoretical model for the balance of forces and torques acting in the spindle, and show that torque is required to generate the helical shapes. We conclude that torques generated by motor proteins, in addition to forces, exist in the spindle and determine its architecture.

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/biorxiv/early/2017/07/24/167437.full.pdf

Bruno Polak

Papers

Overlap microtubules link sister k-fibres and balance the forces on bi-oriented kinetochores

PRC1‐labeled microtubule bundles and kinetochore pairs show one‐to‐one association in metaphase

The mitotic spindle is chiral due to torques within microtubule bundles.

The mitotic spindle is chiral due to torques generated by motor proteins