Enzyme biocatalysis plays a very relevant role in the development of many chemical industries, e.g., energy, food or fine chemistry. To achieve this goal, enzyme immobilization is a usual pre-requisite as a solution to get reusable biocatalysts and thus decrease the price of this relatively expensive compound. However, a proper immobilization technique may permit far more than to get a reusable enzyme; it may be used to improve enzyme performance by improving some enzyme limitations: enzyme purity, stability (including the possibility of enzyme reactivation), activity, specificity, selectivity, or inhibitions. Among the diverse immobilization techniques, the use of pre-existing supports to immobilize enzymes (via covalent or physical coupling) and the immobilization without supports [enzyme crosslinked aggregates (CLEAs) or crystals (CLECs)] are the most used or promising ones. This paper intends to give the advantages and disadvantages of the different existing immobilization strategies to solve the different aforementioned enzyme limitations. Moreover, the use of nanoparticles as immobilization supports is achieving an increasing importance, as the nanoparticles versatility increases and becomes more accessible to the researchers. We will also discuss here some of the advantages and drawbacks of these non porous supports compared to conventional porous supports. Although there are no universal optimal solutions for all cases, we will try to give some advice to select the optimal strategy for each particular enzyme and process, considering the enzyme properties, nature of the process and of the substrate. In some occasions the selection will be compulsory, for example due to the nature of the substrate. In other cases the optimal biocatalyst may depend on the company requirements (e.g., volumetric activity, enzyme stability, etc).

Potential of Different Enzyme Immobilization Strategies to Improve Enzyme Performance

Based on the principles and metrics of green chemistry and sustainable development, biocatalysis is both a green and sustainable technology. This is largely a result of the spectacular advances in molecular biology and biotechnology achieved in the past two decades. Protein engineering has enabled the optimization of existing enzymes and the invention of entirely new biocatalytic reactions that were previously unknown in Nature. It is now eminently feasible to develop enzymatic transformations to fit predefined parameters, resulting in processes that are truly sustainable by design. This approach has successfully been applied, for example, in the industrial synthesis of active pharmaceutical ingredients. In addition to the use of protein engineering, other aspects of biocatalysis engineering, such as substrate, medium, and reactor engineering, can be utilized to improve the efficiency and cost-effectiveness and, hence, the sustainability of biocatalytic reactions. Furthermore, immobilization of an enzyme ...

/pdf/role-of-biocatalysis-in-sustainable-chemistry-5b3e0qe0ep.pdf

Role of Biocatalysis in Sustainable Chemistry

Efficient immobilisation protocols are the result of perfect matching of factors depending on the enzyme, the process and the support for immobilisation. Physical–chemical phenomena, such as partition, solvation and diffusion, strongly affect the efficiency of the biocatalyst in each specific reaction system. Therefore, tailored solutions must be developed for each specific process of interest. Indeed, direct investigation of what occurs at the molecular level in a reaction catalysed by an immobilised enzyme is a quite formidable task and observed differences in the performance of immobilised biocatalysts must be interpreted very carefully. In any study dealing with enzyme immobilisation the prerequisite is the rigorous planning and reporting of experiments, being aware of the complexity of these multi-phase systems.

Efficient immobilisation of industrial biocatalysts: criteria and constraints for the selection of organic polymeric carriers and immobilisation methods

Immobilization is a key technology for successful realization of enzyme-based industrial processes, particularly for production of green and sustainable energy or chemicals from biomass-derived catalytic conversion. Different methods to immobilize enzymes are critically reviewed. In principle, enzymes are immobilized via three major routes (i) binding to a support, (ii) encapsulation or entrapment, or (iii) cross-linking (carrier free). As a result, immobilizing enzymes on certain supports can enhance storage and operational stability. In addition, recent breakthroughs in nano and hybrid technology have made various materials more affordable hosts for enzyme immobilization. This review discusses different approaches to improve enzyme stability in various materials such as nanoparticles, nanofibers, mesoporous materials, sol–gel silica, and alginate-based microspheres. The advantages of stabilized enzyme systems are from its simple separation and ease recovery for reuse, while maintaining activity and selectivity. This review also considers the latest studies conducted on different enzymes immobilized on various support materials with immense potential for biosensor, antibiotic production, food industry, biodiesel production, and bioremediation, because stabilized enzyme systems are expected to be environmental friendly, inexpensive, and easy to use for enzyme-based industrial applications.

Enzyme stabilization by nano/microsized hybrid materials

Two-phase microfluidic flows

Premix emulsification: A review

Thermodynamically controlled synthesis of β-lactam antibiotics. Equilibrium concentrations and side-chain properties

During enzymatic kinetic synthesis of cephalexin, an activated phenylglycine derivative (phenylglycine amide or phenylglycine methyl ester) is coupled to the nucleus 7-aminodeacetoxycephalosporanic acid (7-ADCA). Simultaneously, hydrolysis of phenylglycine amide and hydrolysis of cephalexin take place. This results in a temporary high-product concentration that is subsequently consumed by the enzyme. To optimize productivity, it is necessary to develop models that predict the course of the reaction. Such models are known from literature but these are only applicable for a limited range of experimental conditions. In this article a model is presented that is valid for a wide range of substrate concentrations (0-490 mM for phenylglycine amide and 0-300 mM for 7-ADCA) and temperatures (273-298 K). The model was built in a systematic way with parameters that were, for an important part, calculated from independent experiments. With the constants used in the model not only the synthesis reaction but also phenylglycine amide hydrolysis and cephalexin hydrolysis could be described accurately. In contrast to the models described in literature, only a limited number (five) of constants was required to describe the reaction at a certain temperature. For the temperature dependency of the constants, the Arrhenius equation was applied, with the constants at 293 K as references. Again, independent experiments were used, which resulted in a model with high statistic reliability for the entire temperature range. Low temperatures were found beneficial for the process because more cephalexin and less phenylglycine is formed. The model was used to optimize the reaction conditions using criteria such as the yield on 7-ADCA or on activated phenylglycine. Depending on the weight of the criteria, either a high initial phenylglycine amide concentration (yield on 7-ADCA) or a high initial 7-ADCA concentration (yield on phenylglycine amide) is beneficial.

Modeling of the enzymatic kinetic synthesis of cephalexin--influence of substrate concentration and temperature.

A comparison of microfiltration and inertia-based microfluidics for large scale suspension separation

Premix membrane emulsification is a very efficient process. Its prime disadvantage, depth fouling of the pores, could be avoided by using instead of a membrane, a packed layer of small particles, that can be resuspended and cleaned in suspension after emulsification. The effectiveness of emulsification with this system was measured. The energy density approach was extended to predict the droplet size as a function of pressure drop, bed height, and number of passes. Three different extensions to the model were compared, and a reasonable description was found for the resulting droplet size in all the experiments (167) for a four-parameter model. It is expected that the function derived can be helpful to describe conventional membrane homogenization, since a first comparison showed that the data obtained with the particle bed are similar to those obtained in literature with membranes.

C.G.P.H. Schroën

Papers

Premix emulsification: A review

Thermodynamically controlled synthesis of β-lactam antibiotics. Equilibrium concentrations and side-chain properties

Modeling of the enzymatic kinetic synthesis of cephalexin--influence of substrate concentration and temperature.

A comparison of microfiltration and inertia-based microfluidics for large scale suspension separation

Premix membrane emulsification by using a packed layer of glass beads