C
Carolyn R. Miller
Researcher at North Carolina State University
Publications - 50
Citations - 4597
Carolyn R. Miller is an academic researcher from North Carolina State University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Rhetoric & Rhetorical question. The author has an hindex of 19, co-authored 49 publications receiving 4323 citations. Previous affiliations of Carolyn R. Miller include University of Iowa & Pennsylvania State University.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Genre as social action
TL;DR: In this paper, a conception of genre based on conventionalized social motives which are found in recurrent situation-types is proposed, and the thesis is that genre must be conceived in terms of rhetorical action rather than substance or form.
Journal ArticleDOI
A Humanistic Rationale for Technical Writing
TL;DR: A question arose, during a committee discussion in our English department last year, whether students in our large technological university should be permitted to take a technical writing course to satisfy humanities requirements of their own schools and departments.
Blogging as Social Action: A Genre Analysis of the Weblog
Carolyn R. Miller,Dawn Shepherd +1 more
TL;DR: In 2003, a high school student in Chapel Hill, North Carolina, claimed that the FBI had been reading her diary as mentioned in this paper, which contained references to "hacking" and her friends were aware of her blog but did not know how to find it.
Journal ArticleDOI
Active and interactive learning online: a comparison of Web-based and conventional writing classes
TL;DR: It is maintained that the transfer of active learning strategies to the Web is not straightforward and that interactivity as a goal of instructional Web site design requires significant elaboration.
Journal ArticleDOI
What Can Automation Tell Us About Agency
TL;DR: In this paper, an informal survey that asked teachers of writing and speaking about automated assessment informs an analysis of agency that contrasts performance, audience, and interaction, and suggests that agency can be understood as the kinetic energy of performance that is generated through a process of mutual attribution between rhetor and audience.