Antibody-drug conjugates (ADC) are one of the fastest growing anticancer drugs. This approach comprises a mAb conjugated to the cytotoxic payload via a chemical linker that directed toward a target antigen expressed on the cancer cell surface, reducing systemic exposure and therefore toxicity. ADCs are complex molecules that require careful attention to various components. Selection of an appropriate target, an mAb, cytotoxic payload, and the manner in which the antibody is linked to the payload are key determinants of the safety and efficacy of ADCs. This review provides an overview of the systemic evaluation of each component of an ADC design, improved understanding of the mechanism of action of ADC, and mechanistic pathways involved in ADC resistance and various strategies to optimize ADC design. Moreover, this review also shed light on the current status of ADCs that have gained regulatory approval from the FDA including a description of biology and chemistry, metabolic profiles, adverse events, drug interactions, and the future perspective on combination strategies with other agents, including immunotherapy.

https://mcr.aacrjournals.org/content/molcanres/18/1/3.full.pdf

Antibody-Drug Conjugates: A Comprehensive Review

Nine different antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are currently approved as cancer treatments, with dozens more in preclinical and clinical development. The primary goal of ADCs is to improve the therapeutic index of antineoplastic agents by restricting their systemic delivery to cells that express the target antigen of interest. Advances in synthetic biochemistry have ushered in a new generation of ADCs, which promise to improve upon the tissue specificity and cytotoxicity of their predecessors. Many of these drugs have impressive activity against treatment-refractory cancers, although hurdles impeding their broader use remain, including systemic toxicity, inadequate biomarkers for patient selection, acquired resistance and unknown benefit in combination with other cancer therapies. Emerging evidence indicates that the efficacy of a given ADC depends on the intricacies of how the antibody, linker and payload components interact with the tumour and its microenvironment, all of which have important clinical implications. In this Review, we discuss the current state of knowledge regarding the design, mechanism of action and clinical efficacy of ADCs as well as the apparent limitations of this treatment class. We then propose a path forward by highlighting several hypotheses and novel strategies to maximize the potential benefit that ADCs can provide to patients with cancer. Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) constitute a unique class of anticancer agents with demonstrated clinical efficacy against several different cancer types. Herein, the authors discuss the design and mechanisms of action of ADCs and how these properties are reflected in the clinical activity and toxicity profiles of such agents. Potential strategies to overcome the limitations of ADCs and thereby maximize their therapeutic benefit for patients with cancer are also proposed.

Unlocking the potential of antibody-drug conjugates for cancer therapy.

Eradication of Tumors through Simultaneous Ablation of CD276/B7-H3-Positive Tumor Cells and Tumor Vasculature

In the past decades, our knowledge about the relationship between cancer and the immune system has increased considerably. Recent years' success of cancer immunotherapy including monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), cancer vaccines, adoptive cancer therapy and the immune checkpoint therapy has revolutionized traditional cancer treatment. However, challenges still exist in this field. Personalized combination therapies via new techniques will be the next promising strategies for the future cancer treatment direction.

/pdf/current-status-and-future-directions-of-cancer-immunotherapy-1h7vycwpj1.pdf

Current status and future directions of cancer immunotherapy.

Multidrug resistance (MDR) is a major cause of failure in cancer chemotherapy. P-glycoprotein (P-gp), a promiscuous drug efflux pump, has been extensively studied for its association with MDR due to overexpression in cancer cells. Several P-gp inhibitors or modulators have been investigated in clinical trials in hope of circumventing MDR, with only limited success. Alternative strategies are actively pursued, such as the modification of existing drugs, development of new drugs, or combination of novel drug delivery agents to evade P-gp-dependent efflux. Despite the importance and numerous studies, these efforts have mostly been undertaken without a priori knowledge of how drugs interact with P-gp at the molecular level. This review highlights and discusses progress toward and challenges impeding drug development for inhibiting or evading P-gp in the context of our improved understanding of the structural basis and mechanism of P-gp-mediated MDR.

/pdf/inhibit-or-evade-multidrug-resistance-p-glycoprotein-in-1w4y7o5q6l.pdf

Inhibit or Evade Multidrug Resistance P-Glycoprotein in Cancer Treatment.

Brentuximab vedotin (BV) is an antibody-drug conjugate that specifically delivers the potent cytotoxic drug MMAE to CD30-positive cells. BV is FDA-approved for treatment of relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL); however, many patients do not achieve complete remission and develop BV resistant disease. We selected for BV-resistant HL (L428) and ALCL (Karpas-299) cell lines using either constant (ALCL) or pulsatile (HL) exposure to BV. We confirmed drug resistance by MTS assay, and analyzed CD30 expression in resistant cells by flow cytometry, qRT-PCR, and Western blotting. We also measured drug exporter expression, MMAE resistance, and intracellular MMAE concentrations in BV-resistant cells. Additionally, tissue biopsy samples from 10 HL and 5 ALCL patients who had relapsed or progressed after BV treatment were analyzed by immunohistocytochemistry for CD30 expression. The resistant ALCL cell line, but not the HL cell line, demonstrated downregulated CD30 expression compared to the parental cell line. In contrast, the HL cell line, but not the ALCL cell line, exhibited MMAE resistance and increased expression of the MDR1 drug exporter compared to the parental line. For both HL and ALCL, samples from patients relapsed/resistant on BV persistently expressed CD30 by immunohistocytochemistry. One HL patient sample expressed MDR1 by immunohistocytochemistry. Although loss of CD30 expression is a possible mode of BV resistance in ALCL in vitro models, this has not been confirmed in patients. MMAE resistance and MDR1 expression are possible modes of BV resistance for HL both in vitro and in patients.

https://mct.aacrjournals.org/content/molcanther/14/6/1376.full.pdf

Cecile A. Donohue

Papers

CD30 Downregulation, MMAE Resistance, and MDR1 Upregulation Are All Associated with Resistance to Brentuximab Vedotin

Iron chelators induce autophagic cell death in multiple myeloma cells

Pancreatic cancer in vitro toxicity mediated by Chinese herbs SPES and PC-SPES: implications for monotherapy and combination treatment

Chemosensitization by fibroblast growth factor-2 is not dependent upon proliferation, S-phase accumulation, or p53 status

MDR1 bicistronic vectors: analysis of selection stringency, amplified gene expression, and vector stability in cell lines.