Objective: Most current Electroencephalography (EEG)-based Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs) are based on machine learning algorithms. There is a large diversity of classifier types that are used in this field, as described in our 2007 review paper. Now, approximately 10 years after this review publication, many new algorithms have been developed and tested to classify EEG signals in BCIs. The time is therefore ripe for an updated review of EEG classification algorithms for BCIs. Approach: We surveyed the BCI and machine learning literature from 2007 to 2017 to identify the new classification approaches that have been investigated to design BCIs. We synthesize these studies in order to present such algorithms, to report how they were used for BCIs, what were the outcomes, and to identify their pros and cons. Main results: We found that the recently designed classification algorithms for EEG-based BCIs can be divided into four main categories: adaptive classifiers, matrix and tensor classifiers, transfer learning and deep learning, plus a few other miscellaneous classifiers. Among these, adaptive classifiers were demonstrated to be generally superior to static ones, even with unsupervised adaptation. Transfer learning can also prove useful although the benefits of transfer learning remain unpredictable. Riemannian geometry-based methods have reached state-of-the-art performances on multiple BCI problems and deserve to be explored more thoroughly, along with tensor-based methods. Shrinkage linear discriminant analysis and random forests also appear particularly useful for small training samples settings. On the other hand, deep learning methods have not yet shown convincing improvement over state-of-the-art BCI methods. Significance: This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the modern classification algorithms used in EEG-based BCIs, presents the principles of these Review of Classification Algorithms for EEG-based BCI 2 methods and guidelines on when and how to use them. It also identifies a number of challenges to further advance EEG classification in BCI.

https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1741-2552/aab2f2/pdf

A Review of Classification Algorithms for EEG-based Brain-Computer Interfaces: A 10-year Update

The family of gradient boosting algorithms has been recently extended with several interesting proposals (i.e. XGBoost, LightGBM and CatBoost) that focus on both speed and accuracy. XGBoost is a scalable ensemble technique that has demonstrated to be a reliable and efficient machine learning challenge solver. LightGBM is an accurate model focused on providing extremely fast training performance using selective sampling of high gradient instances. CatBoost modifies the computation of gradients to avoid the prediction shift in order to improve the accuracy of the model. This work proposes a practical analysis of how these novel variants of gradient boosting work in terms of training speed, generalization performance and hyper-parameter setup. In addition, a comprehensive comparison between XGBoost, LightGBM, CatBoost, random forests and gradient boosting has been performed using carefully tuned models as well as using their default settings. The results of this comparison indicate that CatBoost obtains the best results in generalization accuracy and AUC in the studied datasets although the differences are small. LightGBM is the fastest of all methods but not the most accurate. Finally, XGBoost places second both in accuracy and in training speed. Finally an extensive analysis of the effect of hyper-parameter tuning in XGBoost, LightGBM and CatBoost is carried out using two novel proposed tools.

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10462-020-09896-5.pdf

A comparative analysis of gradient boosting algorithms

Deep learning can be applied to the field of fault diagnosis for its powerful feature representation capabilities. When a certain class fault samples available are very limited, it is inevitably to be unbalanced. The fault feature extracted from unbalanced data via deep learning is inaccurate, which can lead to high misclassification rate. To solve this problem, new generator and discriminator of Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) are designed in this paper to generate more discriminant fault samples using a scheme of global optimization. The generator is designed to generate those fault feature extracted from a few fault samples via Auto Encoder (AE) instead of fault data sample. The training of the generator is guided by fault feature and fault diagnosis error instead of the statistical coincidence of traditional GAN. The discriminator is designed to filter the unqualified generated samples in the sense that qualified samples are helpful for more accurate fault diagnosis. The experimental results of rolling bearings verify the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm.

Deep Learning Fault Diagnosis Method Based on Global Optimization GAN for Unbalanced Data

Android security incidents occurred frequently in recent years. To improve the accuracy and efficiency of large-scale Android malware detection, in this work, we propose a hybrid model based on deep autoencoder (DAE) and convolutional neural network (CNN). First, to improve the accuracy of malware detection, we reconstruct the high-dimensional features of Android applications (apps) and employ multiple CNN to detect Android malware. In the serial convolutional neural network architecture (CNN-S), we use Relu, a non-linear function, as the activation function to increase sparseness and “dropout” to prevent over-fitting. The convolutional layer and pooling layer are combined with the full-connection layer to enhance feature extraction capability. Under these conditions, CNN-S shows powerful ability in feature extraction and malware detection. Second, to reduce the training time, we use deep autoencoder as a pre-training method of CNN. With the combination, deep autoencoder and CNN model (DAE-CNN) can learn more flexible patterns in a short time. We conduct experiments on 10,000 benign apps and 13,000 malicious apps. CNN-S demonstrates a significant improvement compared with traditional machine learning methods in Android malware detection. In details, compared with SVM, the accuracy with the CNN-S model is improved by 5%, while the training time using DAE-CNN model is reduced by 83% compared with CNN-S model.

Effective android malware detection with a hybrid model based on deep autoencoder and convolutional neural network

As an enabler for smart industrial Internet of Things (IoT), sensor cloud facilitates data collection, processing, analysis, storage, and sharing on demand. However, compromised or malicious sensor nodes may cause the collected data to be invalid or even endanger the normal operation of an entire IoT system. Therefore, designing an effective mechanism to ensure the trustworthiness of sensor nodes is a critical issue. However, existing cloud computing models cannot provide direct and effective management for the sensor nodes. Meanwhile, the insufficient computation and storage ability of sensor nodes makes them incapable of performing complex intelligent algorithms. To this end, mobile edge nodes with relatively strong computation and storage ability are exploited to provide intelligent trust evaluation and management for sensor nodes. In this article, a mobile edge computing-based intelligent trust evaluation scheme is proposed to comprehensively evaluate the trustworthiness of sensor nodes using probabilistic graphical model. The proposed mechanism evaluates the trustworthiness of sensor nodes from data collection and communication behavior. Moreover, the moving path for the edge nodes is scheduled to improve the probability of direct trust evaluation and decrease the moving distance. An approximation algorithm with provable performance is designed. Extensive experiments validate that our method can effectively ensure the trustworthiness of sensor nodes and decrease the energy consumption.

MTES: An Intelligent Trust Evaluation Scheme in Sensor-Cloud-Enabled Industrial Internet of Things

Up-to-date report on the accuracy and efficiency of state-of-the-art classifiers.We compare the accuracy of 11 classification algorithms pairwise and groupwise.We examine separately the training, parameter-tuning, and testing time.GBDT and Random Forests yield highest accuracy, outperforming SVM.GBDT is the fastest in testing, Naive Bayes the fastest in training. Current benchmark reports of classification algorithms generally concern common classifiers and their variants but do not include many algorithms that have been introduced in recent years. Moreover, important properties such as the dependency on number of classes and features and CPU running time are typically not examined. In this paper, we carry out a comparative empirical study on both established classifiers and more recently proposed ones on 71 data sets originating from different domains, publicly available at UCI and KEEL repositories. The list of 11 algorithms studied includes Extreme Learning Machine (ELM), Sparse Representation based Classification (SRC), and Deep Learning (DL), which have not been thoroughly investigated in existing comparative studies. It is found that Stochastic Gradient Boosting Trees (GBDT) matches or exceeds the prediction performance of Support Vector Machines (SVM) and Random Forests (RF), while being the fastest algorithm in terms of prediction efficiency. ELM also yields good accuracy results, ranking in the top-5, alongside GBDT, RF, SVM, and C4.5 but this performance varies widely across all data sets. Unsurprisingly, top accuracy performers have average or slow training time efficiency. DL is the worst performer in terms of accuracy but second fastest in prediction efficiency. SRC shows good accuracy performance but it is the slowest classifier in both training and testing.

An up-to-date comparison of state-of-the-art classification algorithms

Running time and memory consumption comparison of 10 HUI mining algorithms.Comparison tests using 9 real world and 72 synthetic datasets.d2HUP and EFIM are the top-2 performers regarding running time.d2HUP is fastest when the data is sparse or the average transaction length is large.EFIM is the most efficient algorithm regarding memory consumption. High utility itemset mining (HUIM) has emerged as an important research topic in data mining, with applications to retail-market data analysis, stock market prediction, and recommender systems, etc. However, there are very few empirical studies that systematically compare the performance of state-of-the-art HUIM algorithms. In this paper, we present an experimental evaluation on 10 major HUIM algorithms, using 9 real world and 27 synthetic datasets to evaluate their performance. Our experiments show that EFIM and d2HUP are generally the top two performers in running time, while EFIM also consumes the least memory in most cases. In order to compare these two algorithms in depth, we use another 45 synthetic datasets with varying parameters so as to study the influence of the related parameters, in particular the number of transactions, the number of distinct items and average transaction length, on the running time and memory consumption of EFIM and d2HUP. In this work, we demonstrate that, d2HUP is more efficient than EFIM under low minimum utility values and with large sparse datasets, in terms of running time; although EFIM is the fastest in dense real datasets, it is among the slowest algorithms in sparse datasets. We suggest that, when a dataset is very sparse or the average transaction length is large, and running time is favoured over memory consumption, d2HUP should be chosen. Finally, we compare d2HUP and EFIM with two newest algorithms, mHUIMiner and ULB-Miner, and find these two algorithms have moderate performance. This work has reference value for researchers and practitioners when choosing the most appropriate HUIM algorithm for their specific applications.

Changchang Liu

Papers

An up-to-date comparison of state-of-the-art classification algorithms

An empirical evaluation of high utility itemset mining algorithms