D
Daniel Dajun Zeng
Researcher at Chinese Academy of Sciences
Publications - 115
Citations - 1309
Daniel Dajun Zeng is an academic researcher from Chinese Academy of Sciences. The author has contributed to research in topics: Computer science & Social media. The author has an hindex of 18, co-authored 100 publications receiving 1017 citations. Previous affiliations of Daniel Dajun Zeng include University of Arizona.
Papers
More filters
Posted ContentDOI
Estimating the effective reproduction number of the 2019-nCoV in China
Zhidong Cao,Qingpeng Zhang,Xin Lu,Dirk U. Pfeiffer,Zhongwei Jia,Hongbing Song,Daniel Dajun Zeng +6 more
TL;DR: The results indicate that 2019-nCoV has a higher effective reproduction number than SARS with a comparable fatality rate.
Journal ArticleDOI
MetaSpider: Meta-Searching and Categorization on the Web
TL;DR: Initial results of a user evaluation study comparing MetaSpider, NorthernLight, and MetaCrawler in terms of clustering performance and of time and effort expended show that MetaSpider performed best in precision rate, but disclose no statistically significant differences in recall rate and time requirements.
Journal ArticleDOI
A survey on big data-driven digital phenotyping of mental health
TL;DR: The vision of digital phenotyping of mental health (DPMH) is outlined by fusing the enriched data from ubiquitous sensors, social media and healthcare systems, and a broad overview of DPMH from sensing and computing perspectives is presented.
Journal ArticleDOI
Exploring how the tobacco industry presents and promotes itself in social media.
TL;DR: The prevalence of cigarette brands in social media allows more pro-tobacco information to be accessed by online users and indicates that corresponding regulations should be established to prevent tobacco promotion on social media.
Journal ArticleDOI
An Information Diffusion Based Recommendation Framework for Micro-Blogging
TL;DR: This paper analyzes information diffusion patterns among a large set of micro-blogs who play the role of emergency news providers and proposes a diffusion-based recommendation framework that results in more balanced and comprehensive recommendations compared to benchmark approaches.