scispace - formally typeset
D

Daniel J. D. Natusch

Researcher at Macquarie University

Publications -  53
Citations -  683

Daniel J. D. Natusch is an academic researcher from Macquarie University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Population & Wildlife trade. The author has an hindex of 11, co-authored 47 publications receiving 506 citations. Previous affiliations of Daniel J. D. Natusch include University of New South Wales & University of Sydney.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Wildlife laundering through breeding farms: Illegal harvest, population declines and a means of regulating the trade of green pythons (Morelia viridis) from Indonesia

TL;DR: A survey of wildlife traders in the Indonesian provinces of Maluku, West Papua and Papua was conducted between 2009 and 2011 to assess the trade of the green python (Morelia viridis), the species currently exported in the largest numbers from Indonesia declared as captive-bred as discussed by the authors.
Journal ArticleDOI

Exploited for pets: the harvest and trade of amphibians and reptiles from Indonesian New Guinea

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors surveyed traders of amphibians and reptiles in the Indonesian provinces of Maluku, West Papua and Papua between September 2010 and April 2011 and found that at least 44% were either fully protected or had not been allocated a harvest quota, making their harvest and trade illegal.
Journal ArticleDOI

Effects of consumer preferences for rarity on the harvest of wild populations within a species

TL;DR: The Anthropogenic Allee Effect (AAE) was tested using data collected on wild harvests, preferences of pet keepers and sale prices of different populations of green pythons and hypothesized that the AAE could occur among population within species, not just between them.
Journal ArticleDOI

Jungle Giants: Assessing Sustainable Harvesting in a Difficult-to-Survey Species (Python reticulatus).

TL;DR: The study underpins the need for robust science to inform wildlife trade policy and decision-making, and urges wildlife managers to assess sustainability of difficult-to-survey terrestrial wildlife by drawing inferences directly from the harvest itself.