scispace - formally typeset
D

Daniel McDuff

Researcher at Microsoft

Publications -  219
Citations -  8886

Daniel McDuff is an academic researcher from Microsoft. The author has contributed to research in topics: Computer science & Facial expression. The author has an hindex of 35, co-authored 188 publications receiving 6713 citations. Previous affiliations of Daniel McDuff include Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Non-contact, automated cardiac pulse measurements using video imaging and blind source separation.

TL;DR: This is the first demonstration of a low-cost accurate video-based method for contact-free heart rate measurements that is automated, motion-tolerant and capable of performing concomitant measurements on more than one person at a time.
Journal ArticleDOI

Advancements in Noncontact, Multiparameter Physiological Measurements Using a Webcam

TL;DR: A simple, low-cost method for measuring multiple physiological parameters using a basic webcam, by applying independent component analysis on the color channels in video recordings, which extracted the blood volume pulse from the facial regions.
Book ChapterDOI

DeepPhys: Video-Based Physiological Measurement Using Convolutional Attention Networks

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors proposed an end-to-end system for video-based measurement of heart and breathing rate using a deep convolutional network and an attention mechanism using appearance information to guide motion estimation.
Journal ArticleDOI

Improvements in Remote Cardiopulmonary Measurement Using a Five Band Digital Camera

TL;DR: Results of PPG measurements from a novel five band camera are presented and it is shown that alternate frequency bands, in particular an orange band, allowed physiological measurements much more highly correlated with an FDA approved contact PPG sensor.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Remote measurement of cognitive stress via heart rate variability.

TL;DR: A person-independent classifier was built to predict cognitive stress based on the remotely detected physiological parameters (heart rate, breathing rate and heart rate variability) and the accuracy of the model was 85% (35% greater than chance).