scispace - formally typeset
D

Daniel Stokols

Researcher at University of California, Irvine

Publications -  138
Citations -  17382

Daniel Stokols is an academic researcher from University of California, Irvine. The author has contributed to research in topics: Health promotion & Science of team science. The author has an hindex of 56, co-authored 136 publications receiving 16244 citations. Previous affiliations of Daniel Stokols include University of California & University of California, Berkeley.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Translating social ecological theory into guidelines for community health promotion.

TL;DR: Key strengths and limitations of each perspective are examined, and core principles of social ecological theory are used to derive practical guidelines for designing and evaluating community health promotion programs.
Journal ArticleDOI

Establishing and maintaining healthy environments. Toward a social ecology of health promotion.

TL;DR: The author offers a social ecological analysis of health promotive environments, emphasizing the transactions between individual or collective behavior and the health resources and constraints that exist in specific environmental settings.
Book

Handbook of environmental psychology

TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a survey of the world view of environmental psychology, focusing on Trait, Interactional, Organismic, and Transactional Perspectives (I. Altman & B. Rogoff).
Journal ArticleDOI

The science of team science: overview of the field and introduction to the supplement.

TL;DR: The articles in this supplement address the challenge to characterize the science of team science more clearly in terms of its major theoretical, methodologic, and translational concerns, especially in the context of designing, implementing, and evaluating cross-disciplinary research initiatives.
Journal ArticleDOI

On the distinction between density and crowding: some implications for future research.

TL;DR: There has been a general tendency to view crowding in terms of spatial considerations alone, and a failure to delineate those social and personal dimensions which may interact with spatial factors to mediate the experience of crowding.