Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism.

So far in this course we have dealt entirely with the evolution of characters that are controlled by simple Mendelian inheritance at a single locus. There are notes on the course website about gametic disequilibrium and how allele frequencies change at two loci simultaneously, but we didn’t discuss them. In every example we’ve considered we’ve imagined that we could understand something about evolution by examining the evolution of a single gene. That’s the domain of classical population genetics. For the next few weeks we’re going to be exploring a field that’s actually older than classical population genetics, although the approach we’ll be taking to it involves the use of population genetic machinery. If you know a little about the history of evolutionary biology, you may know that after the rediscovery of Mendel’s work in 1900 there was a heated debate between the “biometricians” (e.g., Galton and Pearson) and the “Mendelians” (e.g., de Vries, Correns, Bateson, and Morgan). Biometricians asserted that the really important variation in evolution didn’t follow Mendelian rules. Height, weight, skin color, and similar traits seemed to

Human biochemical genetics

Physiological and ecological constraints play key roles in the evolution of plant growth patterns, especially in relation to defenses against herbivores. Phenotypic and life history theories are unified within the growth-differentiation balance (GDB) framework, forming an integrated system of theories explaining and predicting patterns of plant defense and competitive interactions in ecological and evolutionary time. Plant activity at the cellular level can be classified as growth (cell division and enlargement) of differentiation (chemical and morphological changes leading to cell maturation and specialization). The GDB hypothesis of plant defense is premised upon a physiological trade-off between growth and differentiation processes. The trade-off between growth and defense exists because secondary metabolism and structural reinforcement are physiologically constrained in dividing and enlarging cells, and because they divert resources from the production of new leaf area. Hence the dilemma of plants: Th...

https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdfplus/2830650.pdf

The dilemma of plants: To grow or defend.

The diversity, frequency, and scale of human impacts on coral reefs are increasing to the extent that reefs are threatened globally. Projected increases in carbon dioxide and temperature over the next 50 years exceed the conditions under which coral reefs have flourished over the past half-million years. However, reefs will change rather than disappear entirely, with some species already showing far greater tolerance to climate change and coral bleaching than others. International integration of management strategies that support reef resilience need to be vigorously implemented, and complemented by strong policy decisions to reduce the rate of global warming.

/pdf/climate-change-human-impacts-and-the-resilience-of-coral-3s1l63rvey.pdf

Climate Change, Human Impacts, and the Resilience of Coral Reefs

Sea temperatures in many tropical regions have increased by almost 1 degrees C over the past 100 years, and are currently increasing at similar to 1-2 degrees C per century. Coral bleaching occurs when the thermal tolerance of corals and their photosynthetic symbionts (zooxanthellae) is exceeded. Mass coral bleaching has occurred in association with episodes of elevated sea temperatures over the past 20 years and involves the loss of the zooxanthellae following chronic photoinhibition. Mass bleaching has resulted in significant losses of live coral in many parts of the world. This paper considers the biochemical, physiological and ecological perspectives of coral bleaching. It also uses the outputs of four runs from three models of global climate change which simulate changes in sea temperature and hence how the frequency and intensity of bleaching events will change over the next 100 years. The results suggest that the thermal tolerances of reef-building corals are likely to be exceeded every year within the next few decades. Events as severe as the 1998 event, the worst on record, are likely to become commonplace within 20 years. Most information suggests that the capacity for acclimation by corals has already been exceeded, and that adaptation will be too slow to avert a decline in the quality of the world's reefs. The rapidity of the changes that are predicted indicates a major problem for tropical marine ecosystems and suggests that unrestrained warming cannot occur without the loss and degradation of coral reefs on a global scale.

/pdf/climate-change-coral-bleaching-and-the-future-of-the-world-s-1z4g0rwyaf.pdf

Climate change, coral bleaching and the future of the world's coral reefs

Marine organisms exhibit great variation in reproductive modes, larval types, and other life-history traits that may have major evolutionary consequences. We measured local and regional patterns of genetic variation in corals along Australia's Great Barrier Reef to determine the relative contributions of sexual and asexual reproduction to recruitment and to infer levels of gene flow both locally (among adjacent sites, < 5 km apart) and regionally (among reefs separated by 500-1,200 km). We selected five common brooding species (Acropora cuneata, A. palifera, Pocillopora damicornis, Seriatopora hystrix, and Stylophora pistillata) and four broadcast spawners (Acropora hyacinthus, A. cytherea, A. millepora, and A. valida), which encompassed a wide range of larval types and potential dispersal capabilities. We found substantial genotypic diversity at local scales in six of the nine species (four brooders, two spawners). For these six, each local population displayed approximately the levels of multilocus genotypic diversity (Go) expected for outcrossed sexual reproduction (mean values of Go:Ge ranged from 0.85 to 1.02), although consistent single-locus heterozygous deficits indicate that inbreeding occurs at the scale of whole reefs. The remaining three species, the brooder S. hystrix and the spawners A. valida and A. millepora displayed significantly less multilocus genotypic diversity (Go) than was expected for outcrossed sexual reproduction (Ge) within each of several sites. Acropora valida and A. millepora showed evidence of extensive localized asexual replication: (1) a small number of multilocus (clonal) genotypes were numerically dominant within some sites (Go:Ge values were as low as 0.17 and 0.20): (2) single-locus genotype frequencies were characterized by both excesses and deficits of heterozygotes (cf. Hardy-Weinberg expectations), and (3) significant linkage disequilibria occurred. For the brooding S. hystrix Go:Ge values were also low within each of four sites (x = 0.48). However, this result most likely reflects the highly restricted dispersal of gametes or larvae, because levels of genetic variation among sites within reefs were extremely high (FSR = 0.28). For all species, we detected considerable genetic subdivision among sites within each reef (high FSR-values), and we infer that larval dispersal is surprisingly limited (i.e., Nem among sites ranging from 0.6 to 3.3 migrants per generation), even in species that have relatively long planktonic durations. Nevertheless, our estimates of allelic variation among reefs (FRT) also imply that for all four broadcast spawning species and three of the brooders, larval dispersal is sufficient to maintain moderate to high levels of gene flow along the entire Great Barrier Reef (i.e., Nem among reefs ranged from 5 to 31). In contrast, widespread populations of S. hystrix and S. pistilata (the two remaining brooders) are relatively weakly connected (Nem among reefs was 1.4 and 2.5, respectively). We conclude that most recruitment by corals is very local, particularly in brooders, but that enough propagules are widely dispersed to ensure that both broadcast spawning and brooding species form vast effectively panmictic populations on the Great Barrier Reef.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00704.x

Genotypic diversity and gene flow in brooding and spawning corals along the Great Barrier Reef, Australia.

In the ocean, large-scale dispersal and replenishment by larvae is a key process underlying biological changes associated with global warming. On tropical reefs, coral bleaching, degradation of habitat and declining adult stocks are also likely to change contemporary patterns of dispersal and gene flow and may lead to range contractions or expansions. On the Great Barrier Reef, where adjacent reefs form a highly interconnected system, we use allozyme surveys of c. 3000 coral colonies to show that populations are genetically diverse, and rates of gene flow for a suite of five species range from modest to high among reefs up to 1200 km apart. In contrast, 700 km further south on Lord Howe Island, genetic diversity is markedly lower and populations are genetically isolated. The virtual absence of long-distance dispersal of corals to geographically isolated, oceanic reefs renders them extremely vulnerable to global warming, even where local threats are minimal.

/pdf/climate-change-genotypic-diversity-and-gene-flow-in-reef-4jxcd98nyv.pdf

Climate change, genotypic diversity and gene flow in reef-building corals

The importance of hybridization in the evolution of plant species is widely accepted, but its contributions to animal species evolution remain less recognized. Here we review evidence that hybridization has contributed to the evolution of reef corals, a group underpinning the coral reef ecosystem. Increasingly threatened by human and climate-related impacts, there is need to understand the evolutionary processes that have given rise to their diversity and contribute to their resilience. Reticulate evolutionary pathways among the ecologically prominent, mass-spawning genus Acropora suggest that hybridization, although rare on ecological timescales, has been
instrumental in their diversification on evolutionary timescales. Evidence that coral hybrids colonize marginal habitats distinct from those of parental species’ and that hybridization may be more frequent at peripheral boundaries of species’ ranges supports a role for hybridization in range expansion and adaptation to changing environments.
We conclude that outcomes of hybridization are significant
for the future resilience of reef corals and warrant inclusion in conservation strategies.

/pdf/the-role-of-hybridization-in-the-evolution-of-reef-corals-elgouaq821.pdf

The Role of Hybridization in the Evolution of Reef Corals

Corals display a wide range of complex life histories. The evolutionary consequences of factors such as clonality, indeterminate growth, asexual reproduction coupled with various (sexual) breeding systems, different levels of gene flow, and strongly overlapping generations have only just begun to be explored. We identify a series of problems and areas for new research that may be resolved b y the application of novel theoretical approaches (including nonequilibrium population genetic models and demographic models incorporating modular processes such as colony fission and polyp mortality), greater in situ experimentation, long-term monitoring of population dynamics and the use of new genetic techniques.

The evolutionary ecology of corals.

The southeast Australian coast potentially includes a complex biogeographic barrier, largely lacking exposed rocky shore that may limit the dispersal of rocky intertidal taxa and contribute to the maintenance of two biogeographic regions Surprisingly, within the 300-km barrier region, several species considered exposed rocky shore specialists occurred within sheltered sites We analysed COI sequence variation for 10 rocky intertidal invertebrate species, with a range of life histories, to test the hypotheses that larval type and habitat specificity are strong predictors of gene flow between biogeographic regions Our data revealed that the southeast corner of Australia includes a strong barrier to gene flow for six of eight species with planktonic larvae, and a coalescence analysis of sequence differentiation (IM model) suggests that a barrier has existed since the Pleistocene In contrast, two direct developers were not affected by the barrier Our comparative approach and data from earlier studies (reviewed here) do not support the hypothesis that larval type predicts gene flow across this barrier, instead we found that the ability to utilize sheltered habitat provides a clearer explanation of the phylogeographic break Indeed, the species that displayed little or no evidence of a phylogeographic break across the barrier each displayed unexpectedly relaxed habitat specificity

David J. Ayre

Papers

Genotypic diversity and gene flow in brooding and spawning corals along the Great Barrier Reef, Australia.

Climate change, genotypic diversity and gene flow in reef-building corals

The Role of Hybridization in the Evolution of Reef Corals

The evolutionary ecology of corals.

Does life history predict past and current connectivity for rocky intertidal invertebrates across a marine biogeographic barrier