scispace - formally typeset
D

David J. Brayden

Researcher at University College Dublin

Publications -  183
Citations -  7784

David J. Brayden is an academic researcher from University College Dublin. The author has contributed to research in topics: Paracellular transport & Drug delivery. The author has an hindex of 45, co-authored 175 publications receiving 6697 citations. Previous affiliations of David J. Brayden include Élan & St. Vincent's Health System.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Advances in PEGylation of important biotech molecules: delivery aspects

TL;DR: This review will discuss recent achievements in PEGylation processes with an emphasis on novel PEG-drugs constructs, the unrealized potential of P EGylation for non-injected routes of delivery, and also on PEGYLated versions of polymeric nanoparticles, including dendrimers and liposomes.
Journal ArticleDOI

Expression of specific markers and particle transport in a new human intestinal M-cell model.

TL;DR: A new, simplified in vitro model of the human M-cell is established to enable controlled studies of M- cell development and function in vitro.
Journal ArticleDOI

Binding and uptake of biodegradable poly-DL-lactide micro- and nanoparticles in intestinal epithelia

TL;DR: The affinity of PLA particles for intestinal epithelia and GALT needs to be greatly enhanced in order to achieve improved oral bioavailability of macromolecules.
Journal ArticleDOI

Intestinal permeation enhancers for oral peptide delivery.

TL;DR: This article assesses the intestinal permeation enhancement action of over 250 PEs that have been tested in intestinal delivery models and places an emphasis on studies where PEs have been formulated with poorly permeable molecules in solid dosage forms and lipoidal dispersions.
Journal ArticleDOI

Current status of selected oral peptide technologies in advanced preclinical development and in clinical trials

TL;DR: The conclusion is that most of the technologies in clinical trials are incremental rather than paradigm-shifting and that even the more clinically advanced oral peptide drugs examples of oral bioavailability appear to yield Oral bioavailability values of only 1-2% and are, therefore, only currently suitable for a limited range of peptides.