scispace - formally typeset
D

David J. Woehr

Researcher at University of North Carolina at Charlotte

Publications -  56
Citations -  6627

David J. Woehr is an academic researcher from University of North Carolina at Charlotte. The author has contributed to research in topics: Work ethic & Teamwork. The author has an hindex of 30, co-authored 55 publications receiving 5882 citations. Previous affiliations of David J. Woehr include Texas A&M University & College of Business Administration.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Does human capital matter? A meta-analysis of the relationship between human capital and firm performance.

TL;DR: It is found that human capital relates strongly to performance, especially when the human capital in question is not readily tradable in labor markets and when researchers use operational performance measures that are not subject to profit appropriation.
Journal ArticleDOI

A quantitative review of the relationship between person–organization fit and behavioral outcomes

TL;DR: In this article, a meta-analytic review of the relationship between person-organization fit (PO fit) and behavioral criteria (job performance, organizational citizenship behaviors, and turnover) is presented.
Journal ArticleDOI

Expanding the criterion domain? A quantitative review of the OCB literature.

TL;DR: A single factor model of OCB that is distinct from, albeit strongly related to, task performance is supported and results show that OCB consistently relates more strongly to attitudes than does task performance and shares a modest amount of variance with attitudinal correlates beyond task performance.
Journal ArticleDOI

Gender and perceptions of leadership effectiveness: a meta-analysis of contextual moderators

TL;DR: The findings help to extend role congruity theory by demonstrating how it can be supplemented based on other theories in the literature, as well as how the theory can be applied to both female and male leaders.
Journal ArticleDOI

Rater training for performance appraisal: A quantitative review

TL;DR: In this article, a general framework for the evaluation of rater training is presented in terms of four rating training strategies (rater error training, performance dimension training, frame-of-reference training, and behavioural observation training) and four dependent measures (halo, leniency, rating accuracy and observational accuracy).