scispace - formally typeset
D

David R. Karger

Researcher at Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Publications -  357
Citations -  55665

David R. Karger is an academic researcher from Massachusetts Institute of Technology. The author has contributed to research in topics: Semantic Web & User interface. The author has an hindex of 95, co-authored 349 publications receiving 53806 citations. Previous affiliations of David R. Karger include Stanford University & Akamai Technologies.

Papers
More filters
Book ChapterDOI

Potluck: Data Mash-Up Tool for Casual Users

TL;DR: Potluck as discussed by the authors is a web user interface that allows casual users to mash up data themselves using a faceted browsing paradigm, which is similar to our approach in many ways to ours.
Posted Content

Improved Approximations for Multiprocessor Scheduling Under Uncertainty

TL;DR: In particular, this article gave an O(log log min(m,n))-approximation algorithm for independent jobs, which is the best known algorithm for the problem.
Journal ArticleDOI

Content Modeling Using Latent Permutations

TL;DR: This paper propose a generalized Mallows model to constrain latent topic assignments in a way that reflects the underlying organization of document topics. But their model is limited to cross-document alignment, document segmentation, and information ordering.
Dissertation

Algorithms for connectivity problems in undirected graphs: maximum flow and minimum k-way cut

TL;DR: The key insight is that two different structural properties of k-way cuts, both exploited by previous algorithms, can be exploited simultaneously to avoid the bottleneck operations in both prior algorithms.

The effect of conference presentations on the diffusion of ideas

TL;DR: In this article , the authors quantify the direct and serendipitous effects of academic conference presentations on future citations by exploiting quasi-random scheduling conflicts and find that when multiple papers of interest to an attendee are presented at the same time, the person is less able to see them on average and, if seeing presentations is important, cites them less.