http://apsychoserver.psychofizz.psych.arizona.edu/JJBAReprints/PSYC501A/Readings/Polich_2007_Clin_Neurophys_Review_P3s.pdf

Updating P300: An Integrative Theory of P3a and P3b

The event-related potential (ERP) technique in cognitive neuroscience allows scientists to observe human brain activity that reflects specific cognitive processes. In An Introduction to the Event-Related Potential Technique, Steve Luck offers the first comprehensive guide to the practicalities of conducting ERP experiments in cognitive neuroscience and related fields, including affective neuroscience and experimental psychopathology. The book can serve as a guide for the classroom or the laboratory and as a reference for researchers who do not conduct ERP studies themselves but need to understand and evaluate ERP experiments in the literature. It summarizes the accumulated body of ERP theory and practice, providing detailed, practical advice about how to design, conduct, and interpret ERP experiments, and presents the theoretical background needed to understand why an experiment is carried out in a particular way. Luck focuses on the most fundamental techniques, describing them as they are used in many of the world's leading ERP laboratories. These techniques reflect a long history of electrophysiological recordings and provide an excellent foundation for more advanced approaches. The book also provides advice on the key topic of how to design ERP experiments so that they will be useful in answering questions of broad scientific interest. This reflects the increasing proportion of ERP research that focuses on these broader questions rather than the "ERPology" of early studies, which concentrated primarily on ERP components and methods. Topics covered include the neural origins of ERPs, signal averaging, artifact rejection and correction, filtering, measurement and analysis, localization, and the practicalities of setting up the lab.

/pdf/an-introduction-to-the-event-related-potential-technique-38ksmp4fjp.pdf

An Introduction to the Event-Related Potential Technique

Many current neurophysiological, psychophysical, and psychological approaches to vision rest on the idea that when we see, the brain produces an internal representation of the world. The activation of this internal representation is assumed to give rise to the experience of seeing. The problem with this kind of approach is that it leaves unexplained how the existence of such a detailed internal representation might produce visual consciousness. An alternative proposal is made here. We propose that seeing is a way of acting. It is a particular way of exploring the environment. Activity in internal representations does not generate the experience of seeing. The outside world serves as its own, external, representation. The experience of seeing occurs when the organism masters what we call the governing laws of sensorimotor contingency. The advantage of this approach is that it provides a natural and principled way of accounting for visual consciousness, and for the differences in the perceived quality of sensory experience in the different sensory modalities. Several lines of empirical evidence are brought forward in support of the theory, in particular: evidence from experiments in sensorimotor adaptation, visual \"filling in,\" visual stability despite eye movements, change blindness, sensory substitution, and color perception.

A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness-Authors' Response-Acting out our sensory experience

Many current neurophysiological, psychophysical, and psychological approaches to vision rest on the idea that when we see, the brain produces an internal representation of the world. The activation of this internal representation is assumed to give rise to the experience of seeing. The problem with this kind of approach is that it leaves unexplained how the existence of such a detailed internal representation might produce visual consciousness. An alternative proposal is made here. We propose that seeing is a way of acting. It is a particular way of exploring the environment. Activity in internal representations does not generate the experience of seeing. The outside world serves as its own, external, representation. The experience of seeing occurs when the organism masters what we call the governing laws of sensorimotor contingency. The advantage of this approach is that it provides a natural and principled way of accounting for visual consciousness, and for the differences in the perceived quality of sensory experience in the different sensory modalities. Several lines of empirical evidence are brought forward in support of the theory, in particular: evidence from experiments in sensorimotor adaptation, visual “filling in,” visual stability despite eye movements, change blindness, sensory substitution, and color perception.

/pdf/a-sensorimotor-account-of-vision-and-visual-consciousness-1o8kf5szfs.pdf

A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness

Let's read! We will often find out this sentence everywhere. When still being a kid, mom used to order us to always read, so did the teacher. Some books are fully read in a week and we need the obligation to support reading. What about now? Do you still love reading? Is reading only for you who have obligation? Absolutely not! We here offer you a new book enPDFd the perception of the visual world to read.

The Perception of the Visual World. By James J. Gibson. U.S.A.: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1950 (George Allen & Unwin, Ltd., London). Price 35s.

Purpose. To compare the test-retest variability (reliability) and the relations among clinical tests of texture and motion processing, visual acuity for high-and low-contrast letters, and the Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity test. Methods. In 20 normally sighted subjects, monocular visual acuity for letters of 96% and 11 % contrast, Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity, and motion-defined and texture-defined letter recognition thresholds were measured on each of two different days. Results. Test-retest correlation coefficients were 0.75, 0.91, 0.61, 0.90, and 0.84 and bivariate test-retest regression slopes were 1.0, 1.1, 0.8, 1.0, and 1.2 for high- and low-contrast acuity, contrast sensitivity, and motion and texture processing, respectively. The inter-test correlations with both test and retest significant were as follows: visual acuity for high-contrast letters vs. visual acuity for low-contrast letters; and recognition threshold for texture-defined letters vs. acuity for letters of both high and low contrast. Conclusion. Test-retest variability for the tests of motion and texture processing were at least as low as for established clinical tests of high and low contrast acuity and contrast sensitivity. We conclude that these new tests offer a reliable means of obtaining clinical information which complements that provided by conventional tests with luminance-defined letters

Test-retest variability and correlations between tests of texture processing, motion processing, visual acuity, and contrast sensitivity.

Magnetic and electrical brain responses to chromatic contrast in human

Visual acuity was tested for 180 eyes of 90 children in four age groups using three types of test charts. Subjects read the same 10 high-contrast letters in Snellen (line) format, as isolated-letter flash cards, and as repeat-letter flash cards. Group mean line and group mean isolated-letter acuity showed similar progressive improvements with age. A subgroup of 24 of 50 eyes of 4- to 5-year-olds (15 of 25 subjects) and 3 of 50 eyes of 6- to 7-year-old (2 of 25 subjects) had low Snellen acuity. Of this low-acuity subgroup of 27 eyes, 10 scored above average for their age group on the repeat-letter chart. We concluded that abnormal lateral interactions were not the explanation for the immaturity of Snellen acuity in these 10 eyes. We suggest that an important factor in the low acuities of these 10 eyes is delayed development of the selection and/or control of gaze direction. Some eyes with excellent Snellen acuity showed high crowding. For example, there were five such eyes in the oldest group. We suggest that the excellent acuities of at least two of these eyes are limited by minor inaccuracies in gaze selection and/or control rather than by lateral interaction.

The component of gaze selection/control in the development of visual acuity in children.

Do letter charts measure contrast sensitivity

By recording the magnetic field of the human brain while simultaneously presenting light to the eye and sound to the ear we have identified a brain region where auditory and visual signals converge. The location of this region is close to primary auditory cortex and far from primary visual cortex.

David Regan

Papers

Test-retest variability and correlations between tests of texture processing, motion processing, visual acuity, and contrast sensitivity.

Magnetic and electrical brain responses to chromatic contrast in human

The component of gaze selection/control in the development of visual acuity in children.

Do letter charts measure contrast sensitivity

An audio-visual convergence area in the human brain