This paper assumes a requirement for an unmanned multiunit satellite to be assembled in orbit. The requirement to be met is to bring the satellites together so tha t they do not collide but actually rendezvous. The equations of motion of the rendezvous satellite in a relative coordinate system are derived and used to compute a final injection velocity which would effect collision after a time r. The velocity is corrected periodically by a command guidance system and just before impact retrothrust is applied. A terminal infrared homing sj^stem is required to actually accomplish physical contact and joining of the satellites. The first satellite placed in orbit is the "control satellite" and controls all the satellites to be assembled and contains the ccmputer, command guidance equipment, precision orientation equipment, and other features necessary to effect rendezvous. The succeeding satellites contain a propulsion system, a rough at t i tude control system, and a command receiver plus whatever scientific equipment they carry to perform their basic mission. This paper presents the following:

Terminal Guidance System for Satellite Rendezvous

5. M. Green, J. Schwarz, and E. Witten, Superstring theory, Cambridge Univ. Press, 1987. 6. J. Isenberg, P. Yasskin, and P. Green, Non-self-dual gauge fields, Phys. Lett. 78B (1978), 462-464. 7. B. Kostant, Graded manifolds, graded Lie theory, and prequantization, Differential Geometric Methods in Mathematicas Physics, Lecture Notes in Math., vol. 570, SpringerVerlag, Berlin and New York, 1977. 8. C. LeBrun, Thickenings and gauge fields, Class. Quantum Grav. 3 (1986), 1039-1059. 9. , Thickenings and conformai gravity, preprint, 1989. 10. C. LeBrun and M. Rothstein, Moduli of super Riemann surfaces, Commun. Math. Phys. 117(1988), 159-176. 11. Y. Manin, Critical dimensions of string theories and the dualizing sheaf on the moduli space of (super) curves, Funct. Anal. Appl. 20 (1987), 244-245. 12. R. Penrose and W. Rindler, Spinors and space-time, V.2, spinor and twistor methods in space-time geometry, Cambridge Univ. Press, 1986. 13. R. Ward, On self-dual gauge fields, Phys. Lett. 61A (1977), 81-82. 14. E. Witten, An interpretation of classical Yang-Mills theory, Phys. Lett. 77NB (1978), 394-398. 15. , Twistor-like transform in ten dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B266 (1986), 245-264. 16. , Physics and geometry, Proc. Internat. Congr. Math., Berkeley, 1986, pp. 267302, Amer. Math. Soc, Providence, R.I., 1987.

Infinite-Dimensional Dynamical Systems in Mechanics and Physics (Roger Temam)

Numerical simulation of large-scale dynamical systems plays a fundamental role in studying a wide range of complex physical phenomena; however, the inherent large-scale nature of the models often leads to unmanageable demands on computational resources. Model reduction aims to reduce this computational burden by generating reduced models that are faster and cheaper to simulate, yet accurately represent the original large-scale system behavior. Model reduction of linear, nonparametric dynamical systems has reached a considerable level of maturity, as reflected by several survey papers and books. However, parametric model reduction has emerged only more recently as an important and vibrant research area, with several recent advances making a survey paper timely. Thus, this paper aims to provide a resource that draws together recent contributions in different communities to survey the state of the art in parametric model reduction methods. Parametric model reduction targets the broad class of problems for wh...

/pdf/a-survey-of-projection-based-model-reduction-methods-for-3yjqbxk305.pdf

A Survey of Projection-Based Model Reduction Methods for Parametric Dynamical Systems

A new method for performing a balanced reduction of a high-order linear system is presented. The technique combines the proper orthogonal decomposition and concepts from balanced realization theory. The method of snapshotsisused to obtainlow-rank,reduced-rangeapproximationsto thesystemcontrollability and observability grammiansineitherthetimeorfrequencydomain.Theapproximationsarethenusedtoobtainabalancedreducedorder model. The method is particularly effective when a small number of outputs is of interest. It is demonstrated for a linearized high-order system that models unsteady motion of a two-dimensional airfoil. Computation of the exact grammians would be impractical for such a large system. For this problem, very accurate reducedorder models are obtained that capture the required dynamics with just three states. The new models exhibit far superiorperformancethanthosederived using a conventionalproperorthogonal decomposition. Although further development is necessary, the concept also extends to nonlinear systems.

/pdf/balanced-model-reduction-via-the-proper-orthogonal-5c77iwc45j.pdf

Balanced Model Reduction via the Proper Orthogonal Decomposition

On the use of higher-order finite-difference schemes on curvilinear and deforming meshes

Nonlinear Aeroelastic Reduced-Order Modeling Approach with Geometric Gradient Computation Capability

The difference between solarelastic interaction and aeroelastic interaction is illustrated from the perspective of external forces. Membrane solarelastic responses of the solar cell and solar sail are studied through a wave model and a corpuscular model of light, respectively, where the light intensity and phase are considered in the wave model to calculate the solar radiation pressure but the phase of light is neglected in the corpuscular model. The effects of the membrane optical properties, the thickness, and the size on the solarelastic flutter instability are investigated. The solar radiation pressure is divided into a part depending on the sail deformation and a part independent of sail deformation to investigate their respective influences. The results show that the former terms result in membrane flutter and the latter term results in membrane static deflection. A comparison is conducted between the wave model and the corpuscular model on the flutter boundaries and membrane responses. The membrane reflectivity is coupled with membrane stiffness by the membrane thickness in the wave model, but it is uncoupled in the corpuscular model. Therefore, the wave model has an advantage over the corpuscular model when evaluating the thickness effect of membrane reflectivity.

Earl H. Dowell

Papers

Nonlinear Aeroelastic Reduced-Order Modeling Approach with Geometric Gradient Computation Capability

Study Membrane Solarelasticity Using a Wave Model and a Corpuscular Model of Light