scispace - formally typeset
E

Emmanuelle Peters

Researcher at King's College London

Publications -  173
Citations -  8565

Emmanuelle Peters is an academic researcher from King's College London. The author has contributed to research in topics: Psychosis & Cognition. The author has an hindex of 47, co-authored 169 publications receiving 7626 citations. Previous affiliations of Emmanuelle Peters include University College London & University of East London.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Measurement of Delusional Ideation in the Normal Population: Introducing the PDI (Peters et al. Delusions Inventory)

TL;DR: The ranges of scores between the normal and deluded groups overlapped considerably, consistent with the continuity view of psychosis, and the two samples were differentiated by their ratings on the distress, preoccupation, and conviction scales, confirming the necessity for a multidimensional analysis of delusional thinking.
Journal ArticleDOI

Measuring Delusional Ideation: The 21-Item Peters et al. Delusions Inventory (PDI)

TL;DR: The PDI's psychometric properties confirmed that it remains a reliable and valid instrument to measure delusional ideation in the general population and suggested that these dimensions may be more important than the content of belief alone for placing an individual on the continuum between normal and delusional thinking.
Journal ArticleDOI

Responding mindfully to unpleasant thoughts and images: Reliability and validity of the Southampton mindfulness questionnaire (SMQ)

TL;DR: The SMQ has a single factor structure, was internally reliable, significantly correlated with the MAAS, showed expected associations with affect, and distinguished among meditators, non-meditators and people with psychosis.
Journal ArticleDOI

The measurement of delusional ideation in the normal population—-introducing the PDI (PEters et al. delusions inventory)

TL;DR: The ranges of scores between the normal and deluded groups overlapped considerably, consistent with the continuity view of psychosis, and the two samples were differentiated by their ratings on the distress, preoccupation, and conviction scales, confirming the necessity for a multidimensional analysis of delusional thinking.