Miltefosine is an alkylphosphocholine drug with demonstrated activity against various parasite species and cancer cells as well as some pathogenic bacteria and fungi. For 10 years it has been licensed in India for the treatment of visceral leishmaniasis (VL), a fatal neglected parasitic disease. It is the first and still the only oral drug that can be used to treat VL and cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL). The standard 28 day miltefosine monotherapy regimen is well tolerated, except for mild gastrointestinal side effects, although its teratogenic potential severely hampers its general use in the clinic and roll-out in national elimination programmes. The pharmacokinetics of miltefosine are mainly characterized by its long residence time in the body, resulting in extensive drug accumulation during treatment and long elimination half-lives. At the moment, different combination therapy strategies encompassing miltefosine are being tested in multiple controlled clinical trials in various geographical areas of endemicity, both in South Asia and East Africa. We here review the most salient pre-clinical and clinical pharmacological aspects of miltefosine, its mechanism of action against Leishmania parasites and other pathogens, and provide a systematic overview of the efficacy and safety data from all clinical trials of miltefosine, either alone or in combination, in the treatment of VL and CL.

Miltefosine: a review of its pharmacology and therapeutic efficacy in the treatment of leishmaniasis

Reevaluation of treatment guidelines for Old and New World leishmaniasis is urgently needed on a global basis because treatment failure is an increasing problem. Drug resistance is a fundamental determinant of treatment failure, although other factors also contribute to this phenomenon, including the global HIV/AIDS epidemic with its accompanying impact on the immune system. Pentavalent antimonials have been used successfully worldwide for the treatment of leishmaniasis since the first half of the 20th century, but the last 10 to 20 years have witnessed an increase in clinical resistance, e.g., in North Bihar in India. In this review, we discuss the meaning of “resistance” related to leishmaniasis and discuss its molecular epidemiology, particularly for Leishmania donovani that causes visceral leishmaniasis. We also discuss how resistance can affect drug combination therapies. Molecular mechanisms known to contribute to resistance to antimonials, amphotericin B, and miltefosine are also outlined.

/pdf/drug-resistance-and-treatment-failure-in-leishmaniasis-a-4fh64rqh9e.pdf

Drug resistance and treatment failure in leishmaniasis: A 21st century challenge

Leishmaniasis: current status of available drugs and new potential drug targets

Background. Miltefosine (MIL), the only oral drug for visceral leishmaniasis (VL), is currently the first-line therapy in the VL elimination program of the Indian subcontinent. Given the paucity of anti-VL drugs and the looming threat of resistance, there is an obvious need for close monitoring of clinical efficacy of MIL. Methods. In a cohort study of 120 VL patients treated with MIL in Nepal, we monitored the clinical outcomes up to 12 months after completion of therapy and explored the potential role of drug compliance, parasite drug resistance, and reinfection. Results. The initial cure rate was 95.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 92.2−99.4) and the relapse rate at 6 and 12 months was 10.8% (95% CI, 5.2−16.4) and 20.0% (95% CI, 12.8−27.2) , respectively. No significant clinical risk factors of relapse apart from age <12 years were found. Parasite fingerprints of pretreatment and relapse bone marrow isolates within 8 patients were similar, suggesting that clinical relapses were not due to reinfection with a new strain. The mean promastigote MIL susceptibility (50% inhibitory concentration) of isolates from definite cures was similar to that of relapses. Although more tolerant strains were observed, parasite resistance, as currently measured, is thus not likely involved in MIL treatment failure. Moreover, MIL blood levels at the end of treatment were similar in cured and relapsed patients. Conclusions. Relapse in one-fifth of the MIL-treated patients observed in our study is an alarming signal for the VL elimination campaign, urging for further review and cohort monitoring.

Increasing Failure of Miltefosine in the Treatment of Kala-azar in Nepal and the Potential Role of Parasite Drug Resistance, Reinfection, or Noncompliance

It is important to realize that leishmaniasis guidelines cannot always account for individual variation among patients. They are not intended to supplant physician judgment with respect to particular patients or special clinical situations. The IDSA and ASTMH consider adherence to these guidelines to be voluntary, with the ultimate determinations regarding their application to be made by the physician in the light of each patient's individual circumstances.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Leishmaniasis: Clinical Practice Guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene (ASTMH)

To the Editor: During 2000–2010, serial Leishmania isolates obtained from an HIV-infected patient who was not responding to treatment showed a gradual decrease in in vitro miltefosine susceptibility. We performed L. donovani miltefosine transporter (Ldmt) gene analysis to identify an association between miltefosine resistance of reference L. donovani lines and variability in miltefosine response of L. infantum isolates. A new single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), L832F, was identified, which might be a marker of miltefosine resistance in leishmaniasis.

The patient, a 46-year-old woman, had lived in France since 1994 but regularly returned to Algeria, her country of birth. HIV-1 infection was diagnosed in 1991. Antiretroviral therapy was initiated in 1993, leading to undetectable viral load and a CD4+ T-cell count of 185 cells/mm3 (reference >450/mm3). Concurrent conditions were thoracic herpes zoster in 1996, hairy leukoplakia of tongue, oropharyngeal candidiasis, and chronic renal failure of unknown cause since 2000.

Visceral leishmaniasis was diagnosed in 1998 by culture of a bone marrow smear, which showed intracellular amastigotes. Use of meglumine antimonate (Glucantime; Sanofi, Paris, France), a drug of choice for the treatment of leishmaniasis, was contraindicated because of pancreatitis in the patient and in vitro isolate susceptibility variation; therefore, induction therapy consisted of liposomal amphotericin B (AmpB [AmBisome; Astellas Pharma US, Deerfield, IL, USA]) at a dose of 3 mg/kg/d for 5 consecutive days, then 1× week for 5 weeks (total dose 30 mg/kg) during 1998–2000 (Table). The same medication was administered for relapses at 4 mg/kg/d for 5 days, then 4 mg/kg 1× week for 5 weeks (total dose 40 mg/kg) during 2001–2010. Given the adverse effects of AmpB and the availability of oral miltefosine (Impavido; AEterna Zentaris Inc., Quebec City, Quebec, Canada), the latter drug was used for maintenance treatment during 2001–2007 at 50 mg 2×/d. Leishmaniasis was monitored by leukocytoconcentration and culture of blood samples on Novy-Nicolle-McNeal medium.



Table

Comparions of IC50 for AmpB and miltefosine against promastigotes and axenic amastigotes and distribution of LdMT SNPs in Leishmania infantum isolates and reference strains*



When signs of biological and clinical relapse appeared, bone marrow was aspirated for parasite detection. After culture of the aspirate and isoenzyme determination, the strain was identified as L. infantum, zymodeme MON-24. Eleven relapses were documented; all were confirmed by positive direct examination of bone marrow or blood, but cultures of only 7 samples yielded positive results (Table).

The susceptibility of 4 cryopreserved isolates (S1, S3, S4, and S6; Table) to AmpB and to miltefosine was studied in the in vitro promastigote and axenic amastigote form by determining the concentrations inhibiting parasite growth by 50% (1,2). The 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) was determined in parallel for the following reference L. donovani lines: a wild-type L. donovani LV9 (MHOM/ET/67/HU3) line (LV9 WT), a wild-type L. donovani DD8 (MHOM/IN/80/DD8) line (DD8 WT), a laboratory miltefosine-resistant line obtained from LV9 WT (LV9 miltefosine-R, resistant to 90 μmol/L miltefosine), and the laboratory AmB-resistant line obtained from DD8 WT (DD8 AmB-R, resistant to 1.4 μmol/L AmB) on promastigote and axenic amastigote forms (3,4).

The AmB susceptibility of the isolates did not change notably over time; IC50 values ranged from 0.09 µmol/L to 0.24 µmol/L, regardless of parasite form, similar to those of wild-type reference strains (Table). In contrast, the IC50 values of miltefosine increased greatly over time, from 5.00 µmol/L to 50.10 μmol/L. During the 6 years of follow-up with miltefosine maintenance therapy, the susceptibility of the isolate (S6) obtained 6 months after miltefosine treatment withdrawal in 2008 was 6-fold higher than that of the first isolate (S1) obtained in 2000.

The L. donovani miltefosine transporter protein (LdMT) promotes miltefosine translocation (5), and LdMT inactivation in L. donovani promastigotes leads to miltefosine resistance at the promastigote and amastigote stages (6). In 2003 and 2006 studies, several mutations were linked to the inability of parasites to take up miltefosine and to miltefosine resistance (5,7). In a 2009 study, the weak expression of LdMT and its β subunit LdROS3 in L. braziliensis isolates was linked to diminished sensitivity (8). We sequenced the entire Ldmt gene (3,294 bp) in the reference strains and the clinical isolates for SNP analysis (5,7). Only 1 new SNP, L832F, was found in the miltefosine-resistant reference strain (LV9 miltefosine-R) and in clinical isolate S6. The L832 wild-type allele was found in isolate S1 and in the miltefosine-sensitive reference lines (LV9, DD8, and DD8 AmpB-R), whereas both alleles were found in isolates S3 and S4, with a decrease in the wild-type allele (Table). The last isolate, which was obtained 3 years after miltefosine withdrawal and could not be subcultured, had reverted to the wild-type allele (L832).

These results point to a relation between the 832F allele and diminished susceptibility to miltefosine. Analysis of this case of miltefosine resistance in a patient co-infected with Leishmania sp. and HIV strongly suggests that an SNP (L832F) in the Ldmt gene could represent a molecular marker of miltefosine resistance in L. infantum and L. donovani.

Françoise Huteau

Papers

Leishmania resistance to miltefosine associated with genetic marker.

Synthesis and antikinetoplastid activities of 3-substituted quinolinones derivatives.

Selection and phenotype characterisation of sitamaquine-resistant promastigotes of Leishmania donovani.