Jeffrey L. Anderson, MD, FACC, FAHA, Chair 

Jonathan L. Halperin, MD, FACC, FAHA, Chair-Elect 

Nancy M. Albert, PhD, RN, FAHA

Biykem Bozkurt, MD, PhD, FACC, FAHA

Ralph G. Brindis, MD, MPH, MACC

Mark A. Creager, MD, FACC, FAHA[#][1]

Lesley H. Curtis, PhD, FAHA

David DeMets, PhD[#][1]

Robert A

/pdf/2014-aha-acc-hrs-guideline-for-the-management-of-patients-1v8ficsqox.pdf

2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society

Guidelines summarize and evaluate all currently available evidence on a particular issue with the aim of assisting physicians in selecting the best management strategy for an individual patient suffering from a given condition, taking into account the impact on outcome, as well as the risk–benefit ratio of particular diagnostic or therapeutic means. Guidelines are no substitutes for textbooks. The legal implications of medical guidelines have been discussed previously.

A large number of Guidelines have been issued in recent years by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) as well as by other societies and organizations. Because of the impact on clinical practice, quality criteria for development of guidelines have been established in order to make all decisions transparent to the user. The recommendations for formulating and issuing ESC Guidelines can be found on the ESC Web Site (http://www.escardio.org/guidelines-surveys/esc-guidelines/about/Pages/rules-writing.aspx).

In brief, experts in the field are selected and undertake a comprehensive review of the published evidence for management and/or prevention of a given condition. A critical evaluation of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures is performed, including assessment of the risk–benefit ratio. Estimates of expected health outcomes for larger societies are included, where data exist. The level of evidence and the strength of recommendation of particular treatment options are weighed and graded according to pre-defined scales, as outlined in Tables 1 and 2 .

View this table:

Table 1 
Classes of recommendations



View this table:

Table 2 
Levels of evidence



The experts of the writing panels have provided disclosure statements of all relationships they may have that might be perceived as real or potential sources of conflicts of interest. These disclosure forms are kept on file at the European Heart House, headquarters of the ESC. Any changes in conflict of interest that arise during the writing period must be notified to the ESC. The Task Force report received its entire financial support from …

/pdf/guidelines-for-the-management-of-atrial-fibrillation-the-1cikaj4630.pdf

Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation The Task Force for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)

The Task Force for the management of atrial fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)  

Developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC  

Endorsed by the European Stroke Organisation (ESO)

/pdf/2016-esc-guidelines-for-the-management-of-atrial-ba0601yb9m.pdf

2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS

/pdf/2016-esc-guidelines-for-the-management-of-atrial-36b2cidm1x.pdf

2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS: The Task Force for the management of atrial fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC. Endorsed by the European Stroke Organisation (ESO)

Supplementary Table 9, column 'Edoxaban', row 'eGFR category', '95 mL/min' (page 15). The cell should be coloured green instead of yellow. It should also read "60 mg"instead of "60 mg (use with caution in 'supranormal' renal function)."In the above-indicated cell, a footnote has also been added to state: "Edoxaban should be used in patients with high creatinine clearance only after a careful evaluation of the individual thromboembolic and bleeding risk."Supplementary Table 9, column 'Edoxaban', row 'Dose reduction in selected patients' (page 16). The cell should read "Edoxaban 60 mg reduced to 30 mg once daily if any of the following: creatinine clearance 15-50 mL/min, body weight <60 kg, concomitant use of dronedarone, erythromycin, ciclosporine or ketokonazole"instead of "Edoxaban 60 mg reduced to 30 mg once daily, and edoxaban 30 mg reduced to 15mg once daily, if any of the following: creatinine clearance of 30-50 mL/min, body weight <60 kg, concomitant us of verapamil or quinidine or dronedarone."

/pdf/2020-esc-guidelines-for-the-diagnosis-and-management-of-38dpic1xu8.pdf

2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS).

Context Antiarrhythmic drugs are commonly used for prevention of recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF) despite inconsistent efficacy and frequent adverse effects. Catheter ablation has been proposed as an alternative treatment for paroxysmal AF. Objective To determine the efficacy of catheter ablation compared with antiarrhythmic drug therapy (ADT) in treating symptomatic paroxysmal AF. Design, Setting, and Participants A prospective, multicenter, randomized (2:1), unblinded, Bayesian-designed study conducted at 19 hospitals of 167 patients who did not respond to at least 1 antiarrhythmic drug and who experienced at least 3 AF episodes within 6 months before randomization. Enrollment occurred between October 25, 2004, and October 11, 2007, with the last follow-up on January 19, 2009. Intervention Catheter ablation (n = 106) or ADT (n = 61), with assessment for effectiveness in a comparable 9-month follow-up period. Main Outcome Measures Time to protocol-defined treatment failure. The proportion of patients who experienced major treatment-related adverse events within 30 days of catheter ablation or ADT was also reported. Results At the end of the 9-month effectiveness evaluation period, 66% of patients in the catheter ablation group remained free from protocol-defined treatment failure compared with 16% of patients treated with ADT. The hazard ratio of catheter ablation to ADT was 0.30 (95% confidence interval, 0.19-0.47; P  Conclusion Among patients with paroxysmal AF who had not responded to at least 1 antiarrhythmic drug, the use of catheter ablation compared with ADT resulted in a longer time to treatment failure during the 9-month follow-up period. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00116428

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/articlepdf/185277/joc90147_333_340.pdf

Comparison of antiarrhythmic drug therapy and radiofrequency catheter ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: A randomized controlled trial

We appreciated the interest of Barison and colleagues in our International Consensus Statement on the treatment of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia (ARVC/D).1 Our document provided a comprehensive overview and recommendations for risk stratification and therapy of patients fulfilling the diagnostic criteria for ARVC/D. These criteria had been addressed by a previous International Task Force consensus document dedicated to diagnosis of ARVC/D.2 According to the revised criteria proposed by the International Task Force in 2010, the diagnosis of ARVC/D is based on the presence of major and minor criteria encompassing electrocardiographic, arrhythmic, morphological, histopathologic, and genetic factors. Diagnosis of definite ARVC/D is fulfilled in the presence of 2 major criteria or 1 major plus 2 minor or 4 minor criteria from different groups; the ARVC/D diagnosis is possible or borderline in the presence of insufficient criteria.

In their Letter to the Editor, Barison and colleagues emphasized the valuable role of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) for diagnosis of ARVC/D, which relies on its ability to combine evaluation of ventricular size, function, and regional wall motion with characterization by late-gadolinium enhancement (LGE) of fibro-fatty myocardial scar, which is the hallmark lesion of ARVC/D. We totally agree that CMR is becoming the gold standard tool for detection of structural and functional ventricular abnormalities in ARVC/D. In the 2010 International Task Force consensus document, CMR was appropriately included among the diagnostic imaging techniques, and specific CMR reference values for normal (and abnormal) ventricular size, systolic function, and regional dyssynergy were provided. Tissue characterization by LGE was not included among these diagnostic criteria because of the potential risk of misdiagnosis of ARVC/D related to the difficulty of assessing LGE at the level of the thin right ventricular wall and possible confusion with normal epicardial fat tissue. More recently, the frequent involvement by the disease of the left ventricular wall in the form of epicardial-mediomural LGE has been recognized. As pointed out by the authors, LV LGE may enhance sensitivity for early/minor or predominant left variants of the ARVC/D; however, its diagnostic accuracy remains to be established.

The prognostic role of CMR and, in particular, of postcontrast sequences for tissue characterization in patients with a diagnosis of definitive ARVC/D remains elusive. In our consensus statement on the treatment of ARVC/D, we performed a systematic review of outcome studies on ARVC/D available in the literature to identify predictor variables that were associated with an increased risk of major arrhythmic events (ie, sudden cardiac death, appropriate defibrillator interventions, or defibrillator therapy on fast ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation), nonsudden cardiac death, or heart transplantation in at least 1 published multivariable analysis. Although the predicting value of CMR for worse arrhythmic outcome was shown in the general population of patients showing premature ventricular beats with a left bundle branch morphology4 and in patients with suspected diagnosis of ARVC/D,5 no specific features of CMR, either alone or in combination, have been reported yet as independent predictors of life-threatening arrhythmic events in patients with a definite diagnosis of ARVC/D. This lack of evidence underscores the importance of undertaking future studies on this field.

Response to Letter Regarding Article, "Treatment of Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy/Dysplasia: An International Task Force Consensus Statement".

Frank Marchlinski

Papers

Comparison of antiarrhythmic drug therapy and radiofrequency catheter ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: A randomized controlled trial

Response to Letter Regarding Article, "Treatment of Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy/Dysplasia: An International Task Force Consensus Statement".