F
Frans A. J. Verstraten
Researcher at University of Sydney
Publications - 160
Citations - 4597
Frans A. J. Verstraten is an academic researcher from University of Sydney. The author has contributed to research in topics: Motion perception & Binocular rivalry. The author has an hindex of 34, co-authored 154 publications receiving 4365 citations. Previous affiliations of Frans A. J. Verstraten include F.C. Donders Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging & Radboud University Nijmegen.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Decreasing perceived optic flow rigidity increases postural sway.
TL;DR: The results of the current study support the view that visual and sensorimotor systems appear to be tailored toward compensating for rigid optic flow stimulation.
Journal ArticleDOI
Perceptual benefits of objecthood.
TL;DR: This work found discrimination performance to be increased if features were perceptually bound into an object and detection performance was higher within and lower outside the bound object as compared to the unbound configuration.
Journal ArticleDOI
Monocular mechanisms determine plaid motion coherence
TL;DR: It is suggested that the mechanism determining plaid coherence responds to the motion of plaid features, and that the coherence mechanism is monocular, which means that it is probably located at a relatively low level in the visual system and peripherally to the binocular mechanisms commonly presumed to underlie two-dimensional motion perception.
Journal ArticleDOI
The Effect of Substituting Discourse Markers on Their Role in Dialogue
TL;DR: This article examined the role of discourse markers across a variety of topics, domains, languages, and media formats and found that they are helpful to localize the stretches of discourse that are believed to contain pragmatic information pertaining to discourse coherence and dialogue goals.
Journal ArticleDOI
Systematic eye movements do not account for the perception of motion during attentive tracking.
TL;DR: This study investigated whether systematic eye movements are present during attentive tracking and, as a result, could be responsible for the subjective experience of movement, and tempted evidence for an earlier suggestion that the percept of movement must arise from a specialized mechanism.