scispace - formally typeset
G

Gideon Yaniv

Researcher at Ariel University

Publications -  59
Citations -  1036

Gideon Yaniv is an academic researcher from Ariel University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Indirect tax & Double taxation. The author has an hindex of 16, co-authored 56 publications receiving 962 citations. Previous affiliations of Gideon Yaniv include Tel Aviv University & National Insurance Institute.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Tax Compliance and Advance Tax Payments: A Prospect Theory Analysis

Gideon Yaniv
- 01 Dec 1999 - 
TL;DR: In this article, the authors apply prospect theory to a simple model of tax evasion, exploring the role that advance tax payments may play in enforcing tax laws, and demonstrate empirically that such payments may substitute for costly detection efforts in enhancing compliance.
Journal ArticleDOI

Junk-food, home cooking, physical activity and obesity: The effect of the fat tax and the thin subsidy

TL;DR: The results show that for a non-weight conscious individual a fat tax will unambiguously reduce obesity, whereas a thin subsidy may increase obesity.
Journal ArticleDOI

Withholding and non-withheld tax evasion

TL;DR: In this article, the authors investigated the employer and employee tax fraud activity under a withholding system and the system's effect on the amount of tax escaping the tax collector, and found that a single job holder's option of evading taxes through underreporting might give rise to evasion of non-withheld taxes through non-filing of individual returns, as well as induce employers to remit to the government less than the amounts withheld.
Journal ArticleDOI

A note on the taxevading firm

Gideon Yaniv
- 01 Mar 1995 - 
TL;DR: This article developed a general model of tax evasion applicable to any form of evasion that might be practiced by the firm and showed that the firm's activity level is always separable from the evasion.
Journal ArticleDOI

Workaholism and marital estrangement: A rational-choice perspective

TL;DR: A dynamic model of rational workaholism is developed, demonstrating that it is not necessary for work to be addictive per se in order to exhibit an addictive pattern throughout which work intensity monotonically increases with time.