Showing papers by "Giorgio Conti published in 2007"

A multiple-center survey on the use in clinical practice of noninvasive ventilation as a first-line intervention for acute respiratory distress syndrome*

Abstract: Objective: In randomized studies of heterogeneous patients with hypoxemic acute respiratory failure, noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) was associated with a significant reduction in endotracheal intubation. The role of NPPV in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is still unclear. The objective was to investigate the application of NPPV as a first-line intervention in patients with early ARDS, describing what happens in everyday clinical practice in centers having expertise with NPPV. Design: Prospective, multiple-center cohort study. Setting: Three European intensive care units having expertise with NPPV. Patients: Between March 2002 and April 2004, 479 patients with ARDS were admitted to the intensive care units. Three hundred and thirty-two ARDS patients were already intubated, so 147 were eligible for the study. Interventions: Application of NPPV. Measurements and Main Results: NPPV improved gas exchange and avoided intubation in 79 patients (54%). Avoidance of intubation was associated with less ventilator-associated pneumonia (2% vs. 20%; p 34 and a PaO2/FIO2 34 and the inability to improve PaO2/FIO2 after 1 hr of NPPV were predictors of failure. (Crit Care Med 2007; 35:18‐25)

Non-invasive ventilation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients: helmet versus facial mask

Abstract: Rationale The helmet is a new interface with the potential of increasing the success rate of non-invasive ventilation by improving tolerance.

Noninvasive versus conventional ventilation to treat hypercapnic encephalopathy in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Abstract: Objective We recently reported a high success rate using noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) to treat COPD exacerbations with hypercapnic encephalopathy. This study compared the hospital outcomes of NPPV vs. conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV) in COPD exacerbations with moderate to severe hypercapnic encephalopathy, defined by a Kelly score of 3 or higher.

Noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation with different interfaces in patients with respiratory failure after abdominal surgery: a matched-control study.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Acute respiratory failure (ARF) is a relatively common complication after abdominal surgery. METHODS: We compared the efficacy of noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation (NPPV) delivered via helmet versus via face mask in patients with ARF after abdominal surgery in 2 intensive care units (31 beds) in the hospital affiliated with the Catholic University of Rome. Twenty-five patients with ARF after abdominal surgery were treated with NPPV via helmet, and the data from those patients were matched with 25 controls chosen from a historical group of 151 patients treated with face mask during the previous 2 years for respiratory complications after abdominal surgery. The matching was done according to age, Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, and the ratio of PaO2 to fraction of inspired oxygen (PaO2 /FIO2 ). NPPV was delivered in pressure support, starting with 10 cm H2O, and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) was increased in steps of 2–3 cm H2O, up to a maximum of 12 cm H2O, in order to maintain an arterial oxygen saturation over 90% with the lowest possible FIO2 . RESULTS: NPPV significantly improved PaO2 /FIO2 in both groups. Five of 25 helmet patients (20%) and 12 of 25 mask patients (48%) were intubated (p < 0.036). The main cause for NPPV failure in both groups was intolerance (mask 32% vs helmet 12%, p 0.6). Heart rate, systolic blood pressure, respiratory rate, duration of NPPV, level of pressure support, and PEEP presented no differences between the 2 groups, nor did intensive-care-unit or hospital mortality. Both the helmet and mask interfaces were effective in improving gas exchange and respiratory rate. The global rate of NPPV complications (mask intolerance, major leaks that caused ventilator malfunction, and ventilator-associated pneumonia) was significantly higher in the mask group than in the helmet group (19 patients vs 4 patients, p < 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: NPPV can be an alternative to conventional ventilation in patients with ARF after major abdominal surgery, and helmet use is associated with a better tolerance and a lower rate

Auditory and vestibular findings in Fabry disease: a study of hemizygous males and heterozygous females

Abstract: Aim: This study aimed to evaluate audiological and vestibular involvement in Fabry disease and the early effects of enzyme replacement therapy with human α-galactosidase A. Methods: Fourteen patients (10 males, 4 females)aged 14-57 years were studied. Each patient underwent a clinical (history of otological and vestibular aspects, otoscopy) and instrumental (pure tone and speech audiometry, impedance, auditory brainstem response and oto-acoustic emission recordings, vestibular caloric tests, electronystagmography during acceleratory stimulation, dynamic posturography) evaluation before starting enzyme replacement therapy. Results: Fifty per cent of patients complained of hearing symptoms (hearing loss, tinnitus, ear fullness). Subjective hearing loss was present in six cases and in three cases it was the first reported symptom of Fabry disease. In six of the seven cases the onset and/or progression of hearing symptoms were sudden. Vertigo or dizziness was reported by four patients and in two cases was associated with hearing symptoms. Audiological evaluation showed sensorineural hearing loss in eight patients (5 males, 3 females). Hearing loss was unilateral in six cases and bilateral in the remaining two cases. The hearing loss (HL) ranged from 30 to 80 dB HL (mean, 43 dB HL) and the lesion was always cochlear. Vestibular examination showed abnormalities in four patients (bilateral weak/abolished response in three cases, side prevalence in one case), which were not related to either the audiological results or the history of vertigo/dizziness. Conclusion: Involvement of the inner ear is common in men and women with Fabry disease. We found a high incidence of cochlear hearing loss, which was typically unilateral and showed onset and/or progression by sudden episodes. Vascular or hydropic mechanisms could be hypothesized to explain audiological findings. Vestibular involvement had a lower incidence and showed a different pattern, thus suggesting that several pathophysiological mechanisms could play a role in determining inner ear damage in Fabry disease. Our preliminary results show that enzyme replacement therapy may stabilize hearing function; however, further follow-up is required.

Exposure to noise during continuous positive airway pressure : influence of interfaces and delivery systems

Abstract: Background: We measured noise intensity and perceived noisiness during continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) performed with two interfaces (face-mask, helmet) and four delivery systems. Methods: Eight healthy volunteers received CPAP in random order with: two systems provided with a flow generator using the Venturi effect and a mechanical expiratory valve (A: Venturi, Starmed; B: Whisperflow-2, Caradyne Ltd); one ‘free-flow’ system provided with high flow O2 and air flowmeters, an inspiratory gas reservoir, and a water valve (C: CF800, Dragerwerk, AG); and a standard mechanical ventilator (Servoventilator 300, Siemens-Elema). Systems A, B, and C were tested with a face-mask and a helmet at a CPAP value of 10 cm H2O; the mechanical ventilator was only tested with the face mask. Noise intensity was measured with a sound-level meter. After each test, participants scored noisiness on a visual analog scale (VAS). Results: The noise levels measured ranged from 57±11 dBA (mechanical ventilator plus mask) to 93±1 and 94±2 dBA (systems A and B plus helmet) and were significantly affected by CPAP systems (A and B noisier than C and D) and interfaces (helmet CPAP noisier than mask CPAP). Subjective evaluation showed that systems A and B plus helmet were perceived as noisier than system C plus mask or helmet. Conclusions: Maximum noise levels observed in this study may potentially cause patient discomfort. Less noisy CPAP systems (not using Venturi effect) and interfaces (facial mask better than helmet) should be preferred, particularly for long or nocturnal treatments.