scispace - formally typeset
G

Göran Arnqvist

Researcher at Uppsala University

Publications -  176
Citations -  15026

Göran Arnqvist is an academic researcher from Uppsala University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Sexual selection & Sexual conflict. The author has an hindex of 58, co-authored 171 publications receiving 14037 citations. Previous affiliations of Göran Arnqvist include University of Belgrade & University of British Columbia.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The pace-of-life: a sex-specific link between metabolic rate and life history in bean beetles

TL;DR: A large number of studies have shown that within species variation, within-species variation in metabolism is more important than the total number of cells in the animal than the number of mitochondria.
Journal ArticleDOI

Identification of novel ejaculate proteins in a seed beetle and division of labour across male accessory reproductive glands.

TL;DR: A recently developed proteomic method involving whole-organism stable isotope labelling coupled with proteomic and transcriptomic analyses to characterize ejaculate proteins in the seed beetle Callosobruchus maculatus identified 317 proteins that were transferred to females at mating, and a great majority of these showed signals of secretion and were highly male-biased in expression in the abdomen.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Effects of Copulatory Courtship on Differential Allocation in the Red Flour Beetle Tribolium castaneum

TL;DR: Female perception of the leg rubbing behavior by tarsal ablation was manipulated and some support for an increase in female oviposition rate in response to intensive leg rubbing was found but no support was found for an effect on sex allocation.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Evolution of Infidelity in Socially Monogamous Passerines Revisited: A Reply to Griffith

TL;DR: The Evolution of Infidelity in Socially Monogamous Passerines Revisited : A Reply to Griffith
Journal ArticleDOI

The efficacy of good genes sexual selection under environmental change.

TL;DR: It is shown that the strength of sexual selection is often weakened relative to fecundity selection, reducing the suggested benefit of sexual reproduction, and illustrates that incorporating the mechanism of selection is necessary to predict evolutionary outcomes.