scispace - formally typeset
G

Guy J. Maddern

Researcher at University of Adelaide

Publications -  672
Citations -  23210

Guy J. Maddern is an academic researcher from University of Adelaide. The author has contributed to research in topics: Medicine & Internal medicine. The author has an hindex of 72, co-authored 595 publications receiving 20809 citations. Previous affiliations of Guy J. Maddern include Leicester General Hospital & Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

National breast cancer audit: overview of invasive breast cancer management.

TL;DR: An overview of results for invasive breast cancer from January 1999 until December 2004 is presented to provide preliminary data for participating surgeons.
Journal ArticleDOI

Interacting effects of preoperative information and patient choice in adaptation to colonoscopy.

TL;DR: It is suggested that all patients undergoing colonoscopy would benefit from watching an educational video in the week before their procedure, and there appears to be no additional benefits in terms of patient outcomes by allowing patients to choose whether they want additional audiovisual information.
Journal ArticleDOI

Choice of surveillance after hepatectomy for colorectal metastases.

TL;DR: The value of repeat hepatectomy for recurrent disease is confirmed, but no direct evidence supporting any surveillance modalities is uncovered.
Journal ArticleDOI

Do metastatic colorectal cancer patients who present with late relapse after curative surgery have a better survival

TL;DR: TTR within 2 years is an independent predictor of shorter survival time for mCRC patients who experience a relapse, and the hypothesis that patients who have late relapse late (>5 years) have a ‘better’ biology or survival compared with patients with a TTR of 2–5 years is not supported.
Journal ArticleDOI

Laparoscopic Skills Maintenance: A Randomized Trial of Virtual Reality and Box Trainer Simulators

TL;DR: Basic laparoscopic skills learned using the FLS simulator were maintained more consistently than those learned on the LapSim simulator, however, by the final follow-up, both simulator-trained cohorts had skill levels that were not significantly different to those at proficiency after the initial training period.