There is, I think, something ethereal about i —the square root of minus one. I remember first hearing about it at school. It seemed an odd beast at that time—an intruder hovering on the edge of reality.

Usually familiarity dulls this sense of the bizarre, but in the case of i it was the reverse: over the years the sense of its surreal nature intensified. It seemed that it was impossible to write mathematics that described the real world in …

I and i

A graph labeling is an assignment of integers to the vertices or edges, or both, subject to certain conditions. Graph labelings were first introduced in the late 1960s. In the intervening years dozens of graph labelings techniques have been studied in over 1000 papers. Finding out what has been done for any particular kind of labeling and keeping up with new discoveries is difficult because of the sheer number of papers and because many of the papers have appeared in journals that are not widely available. In this survey I have collected everything I could find on graph labeling. For the convenience of the reader the survey includes a detailed table of contents and index.

/pdf/a-dynamic-survey-of-graph-labeling-198znmwxtq.pdf

A Dynamic Survey of Graph Labeling

PART I: FOUNDATIONS 1. Introduction to Fixed-Parameter Algorithms 2. Preliminaries and Agreements 3. Parameterized Complexity Theory - A Primer 4. Vertex Cover - An Illustrative Example 5. The Art of Problem Parameterization 6. Summary and Concluding Remarks PART II: ALGORITHMIC METHODS 7. Data Reduction and Problem Kernels 8. Depth-Bounded Search Trees 9. Dynamic Programming 10. Tree Decompositions of Graphs 11. Further Advanced Techniques 12. Summary and Concluding Remarks PART III: SOME THEORY, SOME CASE STUDIES 13. Parameterized Complexity Theory 14. Connections to Approximation Algorithms 15. Selected Case Studies 16. Zukunftsmusik References Index

Invitation to fixed-parameter algorithms

This comprehensive textbook presents a clean and coherent account of most fundamental tools and techniques in Parameterized Algorithms and is a self-contained guide to the area. The book covers many of the recent developments of the field, including application of important separators, branching based on linear programming, Cut & Count to obtain faster algorithms on tree decompositions, algorithms based on representative families of matroids, and use of the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis. A number of older results are revisited and explained in a modern and didactic way. The book provides a toolbox of algorithmic techniques. Part I is an overview of basic techniques, each chapter discussing a certain algorithmic paradigm. The material covered in this part can be used for an introductory course on fixed-parameter tractability. Part II discusses more advanced and specialized algorithmic ideas, bringing the reader to the cutting edge of current research. Part III presents complexity results and lower bounds, giving negative evidence by way of W[1]-hardness, the Exponential Time Hypothesis, and kernelization lower bounds. All the results and concepts are introduced at a level accessible to graduate students and advanced undergraduate students. Every chapter is accompanied by exercises, many with hints, while the bibliographic notes point to original publications and related work.

Parameterized Algorithms

Journal of the ACM

. We present an algorithm that constructively produces a solution to the k -DOMINATING SET problem for planar graphs in time O(c^ \sqrt k n) , where c=4^ 6\sqrt 34 . To obtain this result, we show that the treewidth of a planar graph with domination number γ (G) is O(\sqrt \rule 0pt 4pt \smash γ (G) ) , and that such a tree decomposition can be found in O(\sqrt \rule 0pt 4pt \smash γ (G) n) time. The same technique can be used to show that the k -FACE COVER problem (find a size k set of faces that cover all vertices of a given plane graph) can be solved in O(c
 1
 ^ \sqrt k n) time, where c
 1
 =3^ 36\sqrt 34 and k is the size of the face cover set. Similar results can be obtained in the planar case for some variants of k -DOMINATING SET, e.g., k -INDEPENDENT DOMINATING SET and k -WEIGHTED DOMINATING SET.

Fixed Parameter Algorithms for DOMINATING SET and Related Problems on Planar Graphs

Determining whether a parameterized problem is kernelizable and has a small kernel size has recently become one of the most interesting topics of research in the area of parameterized complexity and algorithms. Theoretically, it has been proved that a parameterized problem is kernelizable if and only if it is fixed-parameter tractable. Practically, applying a data reduction algorithm to reduce an instance of a parameterized problem to an equivalent smaller instance (i.e., a kernel) has led to very efficient algorithms and now goes hand-in-hand with the design of practical algorithms for solving $\mathcal{NP}$-hard problems. Well-known examples of such parameterized problems include the vertex cover problem, which is kernelizable to a kernel of size bounded by $2k$, and the planar dominating set problem, which is kernelizable to a kernel of size bounded by $335k$. In this paper we develop new techniques to derive upper and lower bounds on the kernel size for certain parameterized problems. In terms of our lower bound results, we show, for example, that unless $\mathcal{P} = \mathcal{NP}$, planar vertex cover does not have a problem kernel of size smaller than $4k/3$, and planar independent set and planar dominating set do not have kernels of size smaller than $2k$. In terms of our upper bound results, we further reduce the upper bound on the kernel size for the planar dominating set problem to $67 k$, improving significantly the $335 k$ previous upper bound given by Alber, Fellows, and Niedermeier [J. ACM, 51 (2004), pp. 363-384]. This latter result is obtained by introducing a new set of reduction and coloring rules, which allows the derivation of nice combinatorial properties in the kernelized graph leading to a tighter bound on the size of the kernel. The paper also shows how this improved upper bound yields a simple and competitive algorithm for the planar dominating set problem.

/pdf/parametric-duality-and-kernelization-lower-bounds-and-upper-4xziv7y9bz.pdf

Parametric Duality and Kernelization: Lower Bounds and Upper Bounds on Kernel Size

http://www.akt.tu-berlin.de/fileadmin/fg34/publications-akt/afn-jalg04.pdf

Parameterized complexity: exponential speed-up for planar graph problems

The {\sc $k$-Leaf Out-Branching} problem is to find an out-branching, that is a rooted oriented spanning tree, with at least $k$ leaves in a given digraph. The problem has recently received much attention from the viewpoint of parameterized algorithms. Here, we take a kernelization based approach to the {\sc $k$-Leaf-Out-Branching} problem. We give the first polynomial kernel for {\sc Rooted $k$-Leaf-Out-Branching}, a variant of {\sc $k$-Leaf-Out-Branching} where the root of the tree searched for is also a part of the input. Our kernel has cubic size and is obtained using extremal combinatorics.

For the {\sc $k$-Leaf-Out-Branching} problem, we show that no polynomial kernel is possible unless the polynomial hierarchy collapses to third level by applying a recent breakthrough result by Bodlaender et al. (ICALP 2008) in a non-trivial fashion. However, our positive results for {\sc Rooted $k$-Leaf-Out-Branching} immediately imply that the seemingly intractable {\sc $k$-Leaf-Out-Branching} problem admits a data reduction to $n$ independent $O(k^3)$ kernels. These two results, tractability and intractability side by side, are the first ones separating {\it many-to-one kernelization} from {\it Turing kernelization}. This answers affirmatively an open problem regarding ``cheat kernelization'' raised by Mike Fellows and Jiong Guo independently.

Kernel(s) for Problems with No Kernel: On Out-Trees with Many Leaves

We establish refined search tree techniques for the parameterized dominating set problem on planar graphs. We derive a fixed parameter algorithm with running time O(8kn), where k is the size of the dominating set and n is the number of vertices in the graph. For our search tree, we firstly provide a set of reduction rules. Secondly, we prove an intricate branching theorem based on the Euler formula. In addition, we give an example graph showing that the bound of the branching theorem is optimal with respect to our reduction rules. Our final algorithm is very easy (to implement); its analysis, however, is involved.

http://www.mrfellows.net/papers/AFFFNRS05_PlanarDS.pdf

Henning Fernau

Papers

Fixed Parameter Algorithms for DOMINATING SET and Related Problems on Planar Graphs

Parametric Duality and Kernelization: Lower Bounds and Upper Bounds on Kernel Size

Parameterized complexity: exponential speed-up for planar graph problems

Kernel(s) for Problems with No Kernel: On Out-Trees with Many Leaves

Refined Search Tree Technique for DOMINATING SET on Planar Graphs