scispace - formally typeset
H

Hermann Seitz

Researcher at University of Rostock

Publications -  173
Citations -  4862

Hermann Seitz is an academic researcher from University of Rostock. The author has contributed to research in topics: Medicine & Bone regeneration. The author has an hindex of 25, co-authored 150 publications receiving 3926 citations. Previous affiliations of Hermann Seitz include Center of Advanced European Studies and Research & Islamic Azad University.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

A review on 3D micro-additive manufacturing technologies

TL;DR: In this paper, 3D micro-AM processes have been classified into three main groups, including scalable micro-am systems, 3D direct writing, and hybrid processes, and the key processes are reviewed comprehensively.
Journal ArticleDOI

Three-dimensional printing of porous ceramic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering

TL;DR: A new process chain for custom-made three-dimensional (3D) porous ceramic scaffolds for bone replacement with fully interconnected channel network for the repair of osseous defects from trauma or disease is reported.
Journal ArticleDOI

Hydroxyapatite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering made by 3D printing.

TL;DR: To determine the in vitro behaviour of cells cultivated on the scaffolds, a special test-part was designed to characterise the cell ingrowth and the dynamic cultivation method lead to a stronger population compared to the static cultivation method.
Journal ArticleDOI

Biomaterials as Scaffold for Bone Tissue Engineering

TL;DR: Rapid manufacturing techniques do offer great opportunities to generate suitable scaffolds for bone tissue engineering in the near future, although biocompatibility of the materials used in the process and the structural resolution that can be technically achieved so far limit the range of use.
Journal ArticleDOI

Ceramic scaffolds produced by computer-assisted 3D printing and sintering: Characterization and biocompatibility investigations

TL;DR: The behavior of human osteoblasts on HAP and TCP scaffolds was investigated and cell vitality staining and MTT, LDH, and WST tests showed superior biocompatibility of HAP scaffolds to BioOss, while bioOss was more compatible than TCP.