scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers by "Hermann Wagner published in 2018"


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Visual search in barn owls is studied by tracking their overt attentional deployments-that is, their head movements-with a camera to suggest that during visual search, barn Owls utilize mechanisms similar to those that humans use.
Abstract: How do we find what we are looking for? A target can be in plain view, but it may be detected only after extensive search. During a search we make directed attentional deployments like saccades to segment the scene until we detect the target. Depending on difficulty, the search may be fast with few attentional deployments or slow with many, shorter deployments. Here we study visual search in barn owls by tracking their overt attentional deployments-that is, their head movements-with a camera. We conducted a low-contrast feature search, a high-contrast orientation conjunction search, and a low-contrast orientation conjunction search, each with set sizes varying from 16 to 64 items. The barn owls were able to learn all of these tasks and showed serial search behavior. In a subsequent step, we analyzed how search behavior of owls changes with search complexity. We compared the search mechanisms in these three serial searches with results from pop-out searches our group had reported earlier. Saccade amplitude shortened and fixation duration increased in difficult searches. Also, in conjunction search saccades were guided toward items with shared target features. These data suggest that during visual search, barn owls utilize mechanisms similar to those that humans use.

23 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A model EFP from a simple brainstem circuit with separable pre- and postsynaptic components is analyzed to determine whether it could isolate its sources, and it is concluded that if the spectral components of source types are different and if their activities can be selectively modulated, the identification of EFP sources is possible.
Abstract: Extracellular field potentials (EFPs) generate clinically important signals, but their sources are incompletely understood. As a model, we have analyzed the auditory neurophonic in the barn owl’s n...

11 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The novel findings of these visual effects in an avian species, which lacks neocortical structure, suggest that the basic visual perception shares more universal principles across species than presently thought, and shed light on possible brain mechanisms for perceptual grouping.
Abstract: Perceiving an object as salient from its surround often requires a preceding process of grouping the object and background elements as perceptual wholes. In humans, motion homogeneity provides a strong cue for grouping, yet, it is unknown to what extent this occurs in non-primate species. To explore this question, we studied the effects of visual motion homogeneity in barn owls of both genders, at the behavioral as well as the neural level. Our data show that the coherency of the background motion modulates the perceived saliency of the target object. An object moving in an odd direction relative to other objects attracted more attention when the other objects moved homogenously compared to when moved in a variety of directions. A possible neural correlate of this effect may arise in the population activity of the intermediate/deep layers of the optic tectum. In these layers the neural responses to a moving element in the receptive field (RF) were suppressed when additional elements moved in the surround. However, when the surrounding elements all moved in one direction (homogeneously moving) they induced less suppression of the response compared to non-homogenously moving elements. Moreover, neural responses were more sensitive to the homogeneity of the background motion than to motion-direction contrasts between the receptive field and the surround. The findings suggest similar principles of saliency-by-motion in an avian species as in humans, and show a locus in the optic tectum where the underlying neural circuitry may exist. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT A critical task of the visual system is to arrange incoming visual information to a meaningful scene of objects and background. In humans, elements that move homogeneously are grouped perceptually to form a categorical whole object. We discovered a similar principle in the barn owl9s visual system, whereby the homogeneity of the motion of elements in the scene allows perceptually distinguishing an object from its surround. The novel findings of these visual effects in an avian species, which lacks neocortical structure, suggest that our basic visual perception shares more universal principles across species than presently thought, and shed light on possible brain mechanisms for perceptual grouping.

11 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is found that response adaptation in neurons of the auditory space map in the barn owl's midbrain led to an increased precision and improved selectivity while the best ITD was stable and these changes of representation remained for longer ISIs than were needed to recover from response adaptation at the bestITD.
Abstract: We demonstrate and characterize response adaptation in neurons of the auditory space map in the barn owl’s midbrain with acoustic double-stimulation paradigms. An increase of the second level by 5 ...

8 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Testing how well barn owls can discriminate objects of different sizes found that objects being sufficiently larger than the spatial resolution of the barn owl, the angular threshold was related to object size, implying that the discrimination followed Weber’s law.
Abstract: We tested how well barn owls can discriminate objects of different sizes. This ability may be important for the owls when catching prey. We performed a quantitative experiment in the laboratory and trained owls in a task in which the owls had to discriminate whether two rhombi presented simultaneously on a computer monitor were of the same or of different sizes. We obtained full data sets with two experienced owls and one data point with a third owl. For objects being sufficiently larger than the spatial resolution of the barn owl, the angular threshold was related to object size, implying that the discrimination followed Weber’s law. The range of Weber fractions we determined was between 0.026 and 0.09. For object sizes close to the spatial resolution, performance degraded. We conducted similar experiments with human subjects. Human thresholds showed the same dependence on object size, albeit down to smaller object sizes. Human performance resulted in a range of Weber fractions extending from 0.025 to 0.036. The differences between owls and humans could be explained by the much higher spatial acuity of humans compared with owls.

2 citations