Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33)

XI. STRATEGIES FOR IMPROVING DIABETES CARE D iabetes is a chronic illness that requires continuing medical care and patient self-management education to prevent acute complications and to reduce the risk of long-term complications. Diabetes care is complex and requires that many issues, beyond glycemic control, be addressed. A large body of evidence exists that supports a range of interventions to improve diabetes outcomes. These standards of care are intended to provide clinicians, patients, researchers, payors, and other interested individuals with the components of diabetes care, treatment goals, and tools to evaluate the quality of care. While individual preferences, comorbidities, and other patient factors may require modification of goals, targets that are desirable for most patients with diabetes are provided. These standards are not intended to preclude more extensive evaluation and management of the patient by other specialists as needed. For more detailed information, refer to Bode (Ed.): Medical Management of Type 1 Diabetes (1), Burant (Ed): Medical Management of Type 2 Diabetes (2), and Klingensmith (Ed): Intensive Diabetes Management (3). The recommendations included are diagnostic and therapeutic actions that are known or believed to favorably affect health outcomes of patients with diabetes. A grading system (Table 1), developed by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and modeled after existing methods, was utilized to clarify and codify the evidence that forms the basis for the recommendations. The level of evidence that supports each recommendation is listed after each recommendation using the letters A, B, C, or E.

Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes

BACKGROUND: In patients with type 2 diabetes, the effects of intensive glucose control on vascular outcomes remain uncertain. METHODS: We randomly assigned 11,140 patients with type 2 diabetes to undergo either standard glucose control or intensive glucose control, defined as the use of gliclazide (modified release) plus other drugs as required to achieve a glycated hemoglobin value of 6.5% or less. Primary end points were composites of major macrovascular events (death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke) and major microvascular events (new or worsening nephropathy or retinopathy), assessed both jointly and separately. RESULTS: After a median of 5 years of follow-up, the mean glycated hemoglobin level was lower in the intensive-control group (6.5%) than in the standard-control group (7.3%). Intensive control reduced the incidence of combined major macrovascular and microvascular events (18.1%, vs. 20.0% with standard control; hazard ratio, 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82 to 0.98; P=0.01), as well as that of major microvascular events (9.4% vs. 10.9%; hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.77 to 0.97; P=0.01), primarily because of a reduction in the incidence of nephropathy (4.1% vs. 5.2%; hazard ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.66 to 0.93; P=0.006), with no significant effect on retinopathy (P=0.50). There were no significant effects of the type of glucose control on major macrovascular events (hazard ratio with intensive control, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.06; P=0.32), death from cardiovascular causes (hazard ratio with intensive control, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.04; P=0.12), or death from any cause (hazard ratio with intensive control, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.06; P=0.28). Severe hypoglycemia, although uncommon, was more common in the intensive-control group (2.7%, vs. 1.5% in the standard-control group; hazard ratio, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.42 to 2.40; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A strategy of intensive glucose control, involving gliclazide (modified release) and other drugs as required, that lowered the glycated hemoglobin value to 6.5% yielded a 10% relative reduction in the combined outcome of major macrovascular and microvascular events, primarily as a consequence of a 21% relative reduction in nephropathy. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00145925.)

/pdf/intensive-blood-glucose-control-and-vascular-outcomes-in-74kt1y83u6.pdf

Intensive blood glucose control and vascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Changes in human behaviour and lifestyle over the last century have resulted in a dramatic increase in the incidence of diabetes worldwide. The epidemic is chiefly of type 2 diabetes and also the associated conditions known as 'diabesity' and 'metabolic syndrome'. In conjunction with genetic susceptibility, particularly in certain ethnic groups, type 2 diabetes is brought on by environmental and behavioural factors such as a sedentary lifestyle, overly rich nutrition and obesity. The prevention of diabetes and control of its micro- and macrovascular complications will require an integrated, international approach if we are to see significant reduction in the huge premature morbidity and mortality it causes.

Global and societal implications of the diabetes epidemic

D iabetes mellitus is a chronic illness that requires continuing medical care and ongoing patient self-management education and support to prevent acute complications and to reduce the risk of long-term complications. Diabetes care is complex and requires that many issues, beyond glycemic control, be addressed. A large body of evidence exists that supports a range of interventions to improve diabetes outcomes. These standards of care are intended to provide clinicians, patients, researchers, payers, and other interested individuals with the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals, and tools to evaluate the quality of care. While individual preferences, comorbidities, and other patient factors may require modification of goals, targets that are desirable for most patients with diabetes are provided. Specifically titled sections of the standards address children with diabetes, pregnant women, and people with prediabetes. These standards are not intended to preclude clinical judgment or more extensive evaluation and management of the patient by other specialists as needed. For more detailed information about management of diabetes, refer to references 1–3. The recommendations included are screening, diagnostic, and therapeutic actions that are known or believed to favorably affect health outcomes of patients with diabetes. A large number of these interventions have been shown to be cost-effective (4). A grading system (Table 1), developed by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) andmodeled after existingmethods, was utilized to clarify and codify the evidence that forms the basis for the recommendations. The level of evidence that supports each recommendation is listed after each recommendation using the letters A, B, C, or E. These standards of care are revised annually by the ADA’s multidisciplinary Professional Practice Committee, incorporating new evidence. For the current revision, committee members systematically searched Medline for human studies related to each subsection and published since 1 January 2010. Recommendations (bulleted at the beginning of each subsection and also listed in the “Executive Summary: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetesd2012”) were revised based on new evidence or, in some cases, to clarify the prior recommendation or match the strength of the wording to the strength of the evidence. A table linking the changes in recommendations to new evidence can be reviewed at http:// professional.diabetes.org/CPR_Search. aspx. Subsequently, as is the case for all Position Statements, the standards of care were reviewed and approved by the ExecutiveCommittee of ADA’s Board ofDirectors, which includes health care professionals, scientists, and lay people. Feedback from the larger clinical community was valuable for the 2012 revision of the standards. Readers who wish to comment on the “Standards of Medical Care in Diabetesd2012” are invited to do so at http://professional.diabetes.org/ CPR_Search.aspx. Members of the Professional Practice Committee disclose all potential financial conflicts of interest with industry. These disclosures were discussed at the onset of the standards revisionmeeting. Members of the committee, their employer, and their disclosed conflicts of interest are listed in the “Professional PracticeCommitteeMembers” table (see pg. S109). The AmericanDiabetes Association funds development of the standards and all its position statements out of its general revenues and does not utilize industry support for these purposes.

https://www.science-open.com/document_file/bb04d9d0-b3df-4133-9494-e71e300f4279/PubMedCentral/bb04d9d0-b3df-4133-9494-e71e300f4279.pdf

Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2012

DCCT and Kumamoto Study demonstrated that optimal glycemic control with intensive insulin therapy could delay the onset and progression of the early stages of diabetic microvascular complications in Japanese patients with noninsulin dependent diabetes as well as in patients with insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. To obtain optimal glycemic control, the prandial insulin supplements before each meal are recommended for insulin requiring patients with noninsulin dependent diabetes mellitus whose residual B cell functions are retained to some extent, whereas the combined basal at bedtime plus prandial insulin supplements are essential for the patients with noninsulin dependent diabetes mellitus whose residual B cell functions are severely exhausted as well as in the patients with insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. The glycemic threshold to prevent the onset and progression of diabetic microvascular complications in the Kumamoto Study was indicated as follows; HbA1c < 6.5%, fasting blood glucose concentration < 110 mg/dl, and 2-hour postprandial blood glucose concentration < 180 mg/dl.

Indication of intensive insulin therapy and its practice

Acute effects of somatostatin analog (SMS 201-995) on pancreatic hormones were studied in two patients with malignant islet-cell carcinoma. Before and after subcutaneous injection of somatostatin with a doses of 50 micrograms, blood glucose (BG), serum growth hormone (hGH), C-peptide immunoreactivity (CPR), plasma immunoreactive glucagon (IRG) and gastrin were assayed, and changes in elution patterns of IRG and gastrin were also analyzed on Bio-Gel P-30 column chromatography. In Patient 1 with glucagonoma syndrome and hypergastrinemia, a prompt and remarkable decrease in plasma IRG and gastrin was observed after the injection of SMS 201-995 in association with a decrease in blood glucose, and then IRG and gastrin increased gradually. The suppressive effect continued for at least 6 hours. On gel filtration of the plasma obtained before the injection of the analog, three major peaks, greater than 20000, 9000 and 3500 molecular-weight (mol wt) fractions, were seen in IRG fraction. The decrease in plasma IRG observed at 1 hour after the injection was mainly due to a marked decrease in the 3500 molecular weight fraction. In addition, a slight decrease in the 9000 mol wt fraction was seen. At 4 hours after the injection, the 3500 mol wt peak returned to the previous level, while the 9000 mol wt peak decreased further. On the other hand, the gastrin elution pattern of plasma obtained before the injection revealed three major gastrin peaks, greater than 20000, 7000 and 5000 mol wt fraction. The changes in the gastrin elution pattern after the injection were similar to those of the IRG elution pattern. In Patient 2 with Zollinger-Ellison's syndrome, the plasma gastrin level decreased gradually for 5 hours after the injection. On gel filtration of the plasma obtained before the injection, two major gastrin peaks, 7000 and 5000 mol wt fraction, of which the large-molecular fraction was more prominent than the small-molecular fraction, were observed. After the injection, a marked decrease in the small-molecular fraction and a gradual decrease in the large-molecular fraction were observed for 4 hours, accompanied by a decrease in plasma gastrin. At 7 hours after the injection, the smaller fraction was augmented again. The serum CPR and hGH was slightly suppressed after the injection in both patients. The adverse effects of slight nausea and vomiting were noticed only in Patient 1.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Hideki Kishikawa

Papers

Indication of intensive insulin therapy and its practice

[Inhibitory effects of somatostatin analog (SMS 201-995) on pancreatic hormones in patients with malignant islet-cell carcinoma].

Intensive insulin therapy to prevent the progression of chronic vascular complications in type 2 diabetes mellitus

A case of hypoglycemia caused by insulin antibody, with a history of simultaneous subcutaneous injection of insulin and aurothioglucose

Glycation of Serum High-and Low-Density Lipoproteins in Diabetic Subjects